1 posted on
02/13/2013 10:29:43 AM PST by
Perdogg
To: Perdogg
They should need 60 to get him in and thus republican senators.
2 posted on
02/13/2013 10:35:38 AM PST by
AU72
To: Perdogg
I was wondering if Blunt is in a position to know, so I went to the article, where I found this:
Blunt expects Hagel to provide the information requested. Next story about Blunt will be his "surprise."
3 posted on
02/13/2013 10:37:39 AM PST by
Cyber Liberty
(Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
To: Perdogg
Obama’s response?
Details! Details! An executive order or recess appointment. Just give me a minute.
4 posted on
02/13/2013 10:38:06 AM PST by
llevrok
(The only thing Obama has achieved are rapid executive orders.)
To: Perdogg
We don’t want his nomination delayed. we want it killed!
5 posted on
02/13/2013 10:38:40 AM PST by
pgkdan
( "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." Thomas Jefferso)
To: Perdogg
If so it will be the first time Obama has not received what he asked for from the Senate.
6 posted on
02/13/2013 10:57:17 AM PST by
bigbob
To: Perdogg
So, delay it for 4 years.
7 posted on
02/13/2013 11:15:34 AM PST by
Paladin2
To: Perdogg
but they don’t have the balls...
8 posted on
02/13/2013 11:18:56 AM PST by
wny
To: Perdogg
Just waiting to see if Lindsey Graham will stick to promise to hold up nominations until answers on Benghazi.
9 posted on
02/13/2013 11:31:29 AM PST by
penelopesire
(TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
To: Perdogg
Will Hagel as SecDef put USA interests first? Is he competent, patriotic, ethical? If so I have no problem. If the answer is no then he should not be confirmed. If it is about gay issues or any another country I put it in the irrelevant column.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson