Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SecondAmendment
They keep talking about Heller vs- and self-defense in the home- what a bunch of crap! Do they not know that the words "home" "self-defence" do not appear in the Second Amendment?

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

There are no geographical limits on the Second Amendment.

My 7 CIVILIAN ancestors who fought againt the Tyrant`s troops at Bunker Hill and the Battle of Saratoga II marched all the way from Massachusetts carrying THEIR OWN WEAPONS to shoot any ENEMIES who would INFRINGE IN THE SLIGHTEST on their them of their right to bear arms and ammo...

With bloody battles against a tyrant already echoing fresh in their minds, Our Forefathers did not have any "home-defense" in mind when they wrote those words, but actually OFFENSE against any and ALL TYRANTS, anywhere,anywho anyplace, with any kinds of weapons TO MATCH THOSE CARRIED BY THE MILITARY THEY WERE FACING IN that time and against all future military, which means any automatic weapons, any weapons that the tyrant`s military has, in order not to be out gunned by the tyrant`s military or civil defense cadres..!!!

PERIODDDDDDD>~!!!!!!

I also am ready to march against any Troops the Tyrant has with weapons to match those of the Tyrants` troops as my ancestors did in 1777-

ANY TIME ANY PLACE ANY TYRANT!!!!

The Second Amendment IS FOREVER!!!

C`mon you SOB`s!!! Come n Get It!!!!.

16 posted on 02/12/2013 10:23:40 AM PST by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Marchione.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bunkerhill7
Ding ding ding we have a winner !!

Actually if the libtards learned to read, the would find that D.C. vs Heller explicitly justifies private firearms ownership for MILITARY PURPOSES, specifically quoting Federalist 29.

Furthermore, D.C. vs Heller preemptively finds any ban on commonly used military firearms such as the M-16 to be unconstitutional !!!!

I am surprised someone from our side has not yet brought this up yet ...

19 posted on 02/12/2013 10:50:04 AM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson