"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
There are no geographical limits on the Second Amendment.
My 7 CIVILIAN ancestors who fought againt the Tyrant`s troops at Bunker Hill and the Battle of Saratoga II marched all the way from Massachusetts carrying THEIR OWN WEAPONS to shoot any ENEMIES who would INFRINGE IN THE SLIGHTEST on their them of their right to bear arms and ammo...
With bloody battles against a tyrant already echoing fresh in their minds, Our Forefathers did not have any "home-defense" in mind when they wrote those words, but actually OFFENSE against any and ALL TYRANTS, anywhere,anywho anyplace, with any kinds of weapons TO MATCH THOSE CARRIED BY THE MILITARY THEY WERE FACING IN that time and against all future military, which means any automatic weapons, any weapons that the tyrant`s military has, in order not to be out gunned by the tyrant`s military or civil defense cadres..!!!
I also am ready to march against any Troops the Tyrant has with weapons to match those of the Tyrants` troops as my ancestors did in 1777-
ANY TIME ANY PLACE ANY TYRANT!!!!
The Second Amendment IS FOREVER!!!
C`mon you SOB`s!!! Come n Get It!!!!.
Actually if the libtards learned to read, the would find that D.C. vs Heller explicitly justifies private firearms ownership for MILITARY PURPOSES, specifically quoting Federalist 29.
Furthermore, D.C. vs Heller preemptively finds any ban on commonly used military firearms such as the M-16 to be unconstitutional !!!!
I am surprised someone from our side has not yet brought this up yet ...