Posted on 02/12/2013 7:15:16 AM PST by SeekAndFind
The Senate Armed Services Committee will vote Tuesday on Chuck Hagel’s nomination for secretary of defense, committee chairman Carl Levin (D., Mich.) announced today.
Reports suggest Levin has grown tired of requests for details about the various groups Hagel spoken for and received compensation from, as well as GOP threats to filibuster the nomination until more information is disclosed about the September 11 attacks in Benghazi and the administration’s response. One Republican aide said Levin’s decision to rush through a committee vote was an effort to “snuff the momentum” building in opposition to the Hagel’s nomination.
Levin had originally scheduled a committee vote for last Thursday, but he abruptly cancelled it amid speculation of increasing Democratic hesitancy about Hagel’s nomination, as well as mounting criticism from Republicans over Hagel’s refusal to comply with transparency requests.
If and when the committee approves Hagel’s nomination, the full Senate could vote as early as Thursday. The question then becomes whether or not Republicans will, by filibustering, require a 60-vote threshold for confirmation. Senators Jim Inhofe (R., Okla.) and Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) have openly threatened to do so, and several others have hinted at the possibility.
Democrats would need at least five Republican votes to end a filibuster, a goal that has started to appear increasingly difficult to achieve. “Last week, I was pretty confident that, despite [Hagel’s] horrible showing at the confirmation hearing, he would still probably get to 60 votes,” a GOP Senate aide told National Review Online. “But I think his hiding the ball on [disclosing past associations] is going to hurt his ability get those five Republican votes.”
Hagel supporters have charged that filibustering a cabinet nominee would be unprecedented, but that simply is not true. In 2006, for example, Democrats filibustered the nomination of Dirk Kempthorne, President George W. Bush’s choice for secretary of the interior.
There is nothing Republicans can do to prevent Hagel’s nomination from passing out of the committee, which Democrats control. However, Senate sources confirm that several GOP members of the committee are mulling a walkout of Tuesday’s vote in protest, although Senator John McCain (R., Ariz.) has argued against the idea, calling it “disrespectful to Chairman Levin and at odds with the best traditions of the Senate Armed Services Committee.”
McCain said in a statement Monday that while he shared many of his colleagues’ concerns about Hagel’s nomination, Levin’s decision to hold the vote was “appropriate.”
“Not enough” republican votes suggests that they have some republican votes.
Typical. And the usual last-minute cavers will provide the balance.
Figures McLame would be more worried about bruising Carl Levin’s feelings than the fate of our National Defense (and the entire nation of Israel).
FOR THE THIRD TIME, only two GOPers will vote for Hagel, Johanns and Cochran, Fischer is now on record as being against Hagel.
“Although I do know that the Dems do it so I guess turnabout is fair play. It is not a good precedent. “
My friend, you have just explained why the RINOs are a worthless lot! Turnabout is fair play. This notion that as Republicans “we” must adhere to the Marquis of Queensbury Rules while the RATs do whatever suits moving their agenda, is pure BS. The Republicans NEVER work to consolidate their gains, leaving themselves open to being Effed out of their chairs at the earliest point in time. the RATS have made government a blood sport. Time the Republicans returned the favor. The only way it will ever change is when the RATs are made to realize that they will get what they give, every time.
Are you calling me a RINO? It is hard to have some one like Mark Levin go on the air and say that there is no constitutional requirement for a super majority in the advise and consent role, then using it.
I am not againt playing hardball, but don’t complain about it in the future.
oops....thanks for the correction!
“Are you calling me a RINO?”
NO, read what I wrote! I said you were describing how the GOP operates! They are ball-less wimps who don’t have the intestinal fortitude to give back in spades what the RATs give them. They never make it painful for the RATs when they control anything. So the RATs assume that there will never be any payback for the stuff they pull when they are in the majority. They are like pledges at a fraternity hazing. “Thank you, may I have another!”
Okay, you’re on record.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.