Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kit's all yours: British Army will leave 40% of its equipment in Afghanistan
Mirror ^ | 7 Feb 2013 18:27 | Chris Hughes

Posted on 02/07/2013 11:13:49 AM PST by Pan_Yan

Almost half of Britain’s military ­equipment sent to Afghanistan will never return – and could end up in the hands of the Taliban.

About 40% of gear being used in Helmand Province will be scrapped or sold when UK forces finally leave by the end of next year.

The Government estimates about 11,000 containers of equipment are in Afghanistan, including 3,000 vehicles.

Of these, defence chiefs plan to bring back about 6,500 loads – costing tens of millions of pounds. That means leaving 4,500 containers.

These will not include weapons – but besides everyday items will be non-lethal military hardware that could be of use to insurgents.

(Excerpt) Read more at mirror.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; taliban; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Leaving stuff behind has long lasting unintended consequences.


21 posted on 02/07/2013 11:59:50 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Anyone have a copy of the Willy and Joe cartoon “You blokes sure leave a messy battlefield”?


22 posted on 02/07/2013 12:00:38 PM PST by CrazyIvan (Obama's birth certificate was found stapled to Soros's receipt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
Yeah, but it should be a cheap-shot point as its made about the nation the stood alone against Hitler for a year and a half while the Roosevelt in the US awaited being pushed into the conflict. Anyone that has read about that period from the fall of France to the spring after December 7, 1941 knows that the British held off with bravery in its citizens as well as its soldiers and sailors. We striped them of every valuble asset during that time to pay for their food and supply needs.

You speak of that era as if it were this idealistic war the Brits fought out of sheer altruism. In reality, they were fighting to avoid being overrun. If the situations were reversed, would they have come to our rescue bright and early? Ultimately, it was their war. How often have the Brits come to our aid? Korea. Vietnam. Iraq I. Afghanistan. Iraq II. In total, they lost less than 2000 dead. We lost 300K killed fighting in Europe in WWII alone. We also lost 100K fighting in WWI. The way British logic goes, maybe we should have intervened in the Crimean and Napoleonic Wars. Then we can pretend the Revolutionary War never happened, and these United States remained a Crown Colony subject to periodic military levies.

23 posted on 02/07/2013 12:04:55 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WinMod70

The sea bed works well, too.

No sea near Afghanistan, have to transport through Pakistan
better to make a huge bonfire of all stuff that can benefit the enemy, and give food and kitchen eqipment to locals


24 posted on 02/07/2013 12:05:13 PM PST by munin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT

There was a huge domestic surplus market after the war. It must have been all the materiel that never got sent into theater.

Nearly all the Navy’s PT boats were burned in place in the South Pacific. I saw a movie as a kid about smugglers using PT craft for gunrunning. Their extreme speed made them ideal for the role. I remember pics in magazines of combat aircraft being melted down for the aluminum.

What’s happening with equipment in Afghanistan is outrageous, it should all be destroyed in place or else Karzai & his band of crooks will sell/give it to the Taliban.


25 posted on 02/07/2013 12:07:47 PM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

“Brits” never were too bright.


26 posted on 02/07/2013 12:13:52 PM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: elcid1970

This is funny as you cannot buy a surplus humvee here in the US. They cut them in half so they are only good spare parts.


28 posted on 02/07/2013 12:32:29 PM PST by USAF80
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Man I worked with said once the ships were loaded and at sea they didn’t turn back because some supplies on the ships was still needed.

They junked whatever wasn’t needed when the ship arrived at it’s destination.

As a side note my uncle had a PT boat.

He took out the gas engine and replaced it with a diesel.

He ended up selling the PT boat sometime in the 70’s and bought another boat.

Years later after my uncle had died, someone saw the engine sitting in the middle of the property and bought it.

They were rebuilding a PT boat to it’s original condition.

Turns out it was the PT boat my uncle had that they were rebuilding.


29 posted on 02/07/2013 12:43:23 PM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Just wait until we leave. If Barry gets his way, it will resemble the fall of Saigon....I don’tthink he’d be too bent out of shape if alot of equipment went to Taliban hands.


30 posted on 02/07/2013 12:44:33 PM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Gasoline is even cheaper, put it all in a pile douse it with gasoline and set fire to it. Leave them nothing.

This is a pittance compared to what we will leave behind if we ever leave. Don’t even leave them a toothpick.


31 posted on 02/07/2013 12:55:52 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

This was mentioned in the movie LORD OF WAR about how it was easier for a country to leave it’s equipment behind and order new stuff back home than to take it home with them.

I remember reading how after WWII the Navy dumped tons of perfectly good equipment into the Pacific Ocean rather than take it back to the US. Most of it was brand new. I’m talking planes, tanks, jeeps, bulldozers, road graders, ect.


32 posted on 02/07/2013 1:02:24 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name! See new paintings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

A local to me guy in the National Guard was brought up on Federal charges because he had the audacity to send items back home that were listed as “expendable” on their inventory instead of leave them behind. Once the items (flashlights) got back home, he gave them out to his buddies and even some to the local Sheriff’s office. I guess the Feds didn’t like that and had him charged with theft of Govt property.


33 posted on 02/07/2013 1:20:48 PM PST by Dubya-M-Dees (Little HOPE... No CHANGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

UM, the US is leaving far more than that. There are untold amounts of equipment that is there that no one knows who ordered it or what to with it.


34 posted on 02/07/2013 1:22:28 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

We do the same thing. There’s lots of equipment that’s not worth the cost to bring back. Most of it has been worked hard and isn’t in good shape, and it’s all bulky and heavy, and the accounting department has already depreciated it out on the ledgers so they’d be looking for an excuse to get rid of it at home anyway. It’s never anything dangerous, jeeps, half shells, cots, general crap. Weapons and ammo come home, general supplies frequently stay.


35 posted on 02/07/2013 1:28:05 PM PST by discostu (I recommend a fifth of Jack and a bottle of Prozac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

” I’m talking planes, tanks, jeeps, bulldozers, road graders, ect.”

And this stuff wasn’t useful to the local populations that had their entire infrastructure destroyed? No this was all about ensuring that the American companies profit after the fact twice, once by selling the equipment to the USG and then by selling another set to the countries that needed to be rebuilt.


36 posted on 02/07/2013 1:28:16 PM PST by trapped_in_LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

I knew a guy who was involved in dynamiting “a mountain” of beer in the Philippines at the end of WWII. He said it was enough beer to put every brewer in the Philippines out of business for ten years.


37 posted on 02/07/2013 1:57:43 PM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWGinger

you’d think an enterprising business man that owes or wants to own a scrap metal business would make a deal with the Brits to purchase everything they don’t dont for pennies on the dollar.


38 posted on 02/07/2013 2:47:18 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

‘If the situations were reversed, would they have come to our rescue bright and early?’

Yes. We went into two world wars to defend Belgium and Poland.

‘How often have the Brits come to our aid? Korea. Iraq I. Afghanistan. Iraq II.’

4-2 to us then. BTW, I assume you know WHY we didnt get involved in Vietnam (officially).

‘In total, they lost less than 2000 dead. We lost 300K killed fighting in Europe in WWII alone.’

And your point is?.

‘The way British logic goes, maybe we should have intervened in the Crimean and Napoleonic Wars. ‘

We dont mind you entered both world wars later than us. What we DO object to is the ‘we saved your ass/you’d be speaking German if not for us’ crap. Knock that s*it off and we wont crack remarks about ‘turning up late’.


39 posted on 02/07/2013 2:53:07 PM PST by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

We did save your asses in two World Wars and you wold be speaking German if it weren’t for us. After you, like a bunch of sheep, turned in your weapons the NRA members shipped tens of thousands of firearms to Britain, for free.

If it weren’t for the American Merchant Marine England would have fallen. If it weren’t for Lend-Lease you’d have been throwing rocks at Germans.

If it weren’t for Neville Chamberlain WWII could have been averted. If you’d defended the Czechs instead of handing them to Hitler on a silver platter you wouldn’t have had to fight in Poland or Belgium.

Nice work drawing all those nice, straight lines in the Middle East, too. The planet is still paying for that idiocy.


40 posted on 02/07/2013 3:05:09 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson