Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British House of Commons Approves Gay Marriage
New York Times ^ | Feburary 5, 2013 | John F. Burns & Adam Cowell

Posted on 02/05/2013 5:29:33 PM PST by fractionated

The House of Commons voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to approve a bill legalizing same-sex marriage in Britain, indicating that the bill is assured of passage as it moves through further legislative stages....

After a six-hour debate, the Commons vote was 400 to 175 for the bill. It will have to pass in the House of Lords, where delaying tactics by opponents are possible, but Mr. Cameron has said that he plans to have the bill enacted into law sometime this summer.....

A day after the newly confirmed archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, took office saying that he shared the Church of England’s opposition to same-sex marriage, three cabinet officials said in a letter published in The Daily Telegraph that the new legislation was “the right thing to do at the right time.”

“Marriage has evolved over time,” the letter said. “We believe that opening it up to same-sex couples will strengthen, not weaken, the institution.”

The three ministers — George Osborne, the chancellor of the Exchequer, Foreign Secretary William Hague and Home Secretary Theresa May — also asked whether it was “any longer acceptable to exclude people from marriage simply because they love someone of the same sex.”

Ed Miliband, the leader of the opposition Labour Party, had said on Monday that he would urge his 255 legislators in the 649-member body to vote with him.

“I’ll be voting for equal marriage for a very simple reason: I don’t think that the person you love should determine the rights you have,” he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: communists; gaymarriage; gayrights; homosexualagenda; marriageequality; perverts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last

1 posted on 02/05/2013 5:29:43 PM PST by fractionated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fractionated

Its good to know that while the muslims take over their once great nation the government of Britain is taking care of the really important issues.


2 posted on 02/05/2013 5:31:43 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fractionated
Marriage has evolved over time

No, not really. We're just doing what the people in Sodom did. Nothing new under the sun.

3 posted on 02/05/2013 5:35:57 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fractionated

“Now, since the family and human society at large spring from marriage, these men will on no account allow matrimony to be the subject of the jurisdiction of the Church. Nay, they endeavor to deprive it of all holiness, and so bring it within the contracted sphere of those rights which, having been instituted by man, are ruled and administered by the civil jurisprudence of the community. Wherefore it necessarily follows that they attribute all power over marriage to civil rulers, and allow none whatever to the Church; and, when the Church exercises any such power, they think that she acts either by favor of the civil authority or to its injury. Now is the time, they say, for the heads of the State to vindicate their rights unflinchingly, and to do their best to settle all that relates to marriage according as to them seems good.”

Pope Leo XIII, 1880

Freegards


4 posted on 02/05/2013 5:39:06 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fractionated

Britain goes libertarian, next is polygamy.


5 posted on 02/05/2013 5:54:45 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fractionated

>> “We believe that opening it up to same-sex couples will strengthen, not weaken, the institution.”

Beliefs shaped by political inevitability. #ing asshats.


6 posted on 02/05/2013 5:56:12 PM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
>> Britain goes libertarian, next is polygamy.

They enacted law, silly.

The House of Commons voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to approve a bill legalizing same-sex marriage in Britain.

libertarianism: an extreme laissez-faire political philosophy advocating only minimal state intervention in the lives of citizens.

7 posted on 02/05/2013 5:59:59 PM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Should say in the process of enacting law...


8 posted on 02/05/2013 6:01:37 PM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fractionated
It's true that if marriage is defined as something like, "The union of consenting adults for their own longterm fulfillment," there's no reason to exclude two men, two women, a mother and son, two brothers, or even to confine it to two. If it's just a matter of "who you love," surely most of us love more than just one person.

And there's no need for the government to be involved in it at all. In fact, it would be irrational for the government to BE involved: there's no public interest. And there truly isn't, if it's a private relation: an adult social unit in which adults are negotiating or contracting for their own self-interest.

But if the definition of marriage is "the union of a man and a woman with each other, and any children who come from their union, then sure, gay couples can marry: if the couple consists of a gay man and a lesbian! Because this is the only kind of "gay couple" which could actually have children come from their union.

The fatal fact is that a good many heterosexuals have already "changed the definition of marriage," essentially excluding children from their idea of what it IS. In other words, they have already radically shrunk marriage to an arrangement that centers on adult desires.

In that case, gays aren't really breaking up marriage. That's already largely accomplished. Nonmarital cohabitation did that. Contraception did that. Easy divorce did that. Fifty million abortions did that. Gays are just looking at the shapeless, broken heap of disjointed pieces of the-thing-that-used-to-be-called-marriage, and saying, "Oh, look, there's a piece I like. You're mean if you don't let me have it."

9 posted on 02/05/2013 6:06:18 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (De veras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fractionated

Who gives a crap? Britain’s going “to Hell in a handbasket” as the expression goes. Just another example of what a joke the “conservative” party there has begun.

Props to those who voted no, however. That’s a real statement in modern Britain.

(And to the person who said they’re going ‘libertarian’, gay marriage is part of the libertarian platform, but to label Britain as libertarian is grossly inaccurate. As with Obama, this is just classic ‘progressivism’, which can be very simply defined as statism with perks for interest groups to keep the ruling party in favor with their coalition. Just mimic the zeitgeist and tear down all those who challenge. That’s the progressive motto.)


10 posted on 02/05/2013 6:14:57 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

‘Its good to know that while the muslims take over their once great nation’

Do Americans really believe that rubbish?.


11 posted on 02/05/2013 6:18:09 PM PST by the scotsman (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

>> And there’s no need for the government to be involved in it at all.

Agreed. But its involvement exceeds necessity, and is in reality insidious — it inevitably persecutes those that do not conform, support, nor service the beneficiaries.


12 posted on 02/05/2013 6:20:04 PM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Britain enacted part of the libertarian agenda, homosexual marriage, libertarians also support polygamy.


13 posted on 02/05/2013 6:30:08 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

heh, Libertarians believe the state should enforce their own beliefs. Odd that. Next up - confiscation of Church property from those who refuse to submit.


14 posted on 02/05/2013 6:33:17 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
Exactly. It's just another siege engine for smashing down the principal weight-bearing walls, the structural elements of society (family, church) which stand between the atomized individual and the totalitarian state.

They say they're for diversity, when actually what they want is One. Hundred. Percent. Conformity.

15 posted on 02/05/2013 6:35:18 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (De veras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon
(And to the person who said they’re going ‘libertarian’, gay marriage is part of the libertarian platform, but to label Britain as libertarian is grossly inaccurate. As with Obama, this is just classic ‘progressivism’,

I'm that person, who you could have pinged, I didn't say the Britain is libertarian, but like America, it is becoming more libertarian, and homosexual marriage is part of that, as is polygamy.

16 posted on 02/05/2013 6:35:53 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

Not living there I only know what I read in your newspapers, obviously. Why don’t you tell us?


17 posted on 02/05/2013 6:37:58 PM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fractionated

Way to go England. You’re more irrelevant than ever now.

And from a Tory government. What a frickin’ shame.


18 posted on 02/05/2013 6:39:15 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fractionated

equal marriage hey, see my tagline

Then all sorts of marriage shoudl apply if they think equality and the feces anal sex lovers will support it, ARF.

I could not care if I was the last one on this world who defends normal marriage, I will never shut up and never support their sick perverted disgusting feces marriage


19 posted on 02/05/2013 6:39:57 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I refuse to call them gay, gay means happy, they are homosexuals and I refuse to play their name games and put a happy word on their sick anal feces sex.

If our side had some guts then the left would not have destroyed families as much but alas the cowards on our side who refuse to speak up to neighbors, friends, family, on TV etc are just as much to blame


20 posted on 02/05/2013 6:43:26 PM PST by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

It seems to me the institution and society can benefit with the state’s involvement, or they can be harmed.

Either way, how does one keep many from being conditioned that the state defines marriage in the first place? To the state, marriage is whatever judges, pols, or the voting majority thinks it is. If it recognizes the instititution, it needs a definition, and how else does it come up with one, at least in the modern era? I mean I think that’s why so many have accepted ‘gay marriage’, it was possible for the state to approve it, so it must be possible.

On the good side, you make a good point about the children, in my opinion. The other side would say ‘but old folks get marrried and there is adoption and surrogates or whatever.’ Which I think isn’t a very good argument considering that if the state did what it was supposed to do many would benefit, the fringe cases don’t impede that. In a perfect world.

On the bad side, if the state is involved, how do you stop from being punished when you disagree with whatever impossibility the state is calling marriage at the time? They need a way to punish those who will never buy into it, and the state is that stick. That’s why supporting ‘gay marriage’ is so stupid for the big party libertarians: statists and homosexualists punishing those who will never agree with them as concerns marriage with the power of the state is what the ‘gay marriage’ debate is all about, something they say they are against generally.

Freegards


21 posted on 02/05/2013 6:53:17 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fractionated

Pedophiles are next on that slippery slope


22 posted on 02/05/2013 7:03:55 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

If America is becoming more libertarian, shouldn’t we see a movement towards more limited government? Or are you just grinding your funny little axe again?


23 posted on 02/05/2013 7:05:05 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; ansel12

pedo’s are next

moral decay is NOT evolution


24 posted on 02/05/2013 7:05:54 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

There is absolutely no argument against the fact that America is becoming more libertarian, some parts of the libertarian agenda are easier to attain than other parts, unfortunately, the easier parts, those that they share with their leftist brothers, are the easiest to attain, and they make conservative economics impossible, that is the lie behind libertarianism.

Look at libertarians desire for totally open borders and banning the Border patrol and the INS, they argue that if you end all the social programs, then their open borders agenda makes total sense.

Which half of the libertarian immigration agenda is most likely to succeed, and which half will NEVER happen?

Rinse and repeat for homosexualizing the military and gay marriage, polygamy, even more abortion “rights”, even more of the homosexual agenda, even elimination or lowering of consent laws. etc. etc. etc.


25 posted on 02/05/2013 7:20:29 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
pedo’s are next moral decay is NOT evolution

Sure, libertarians are on the front lines, defending pedophilia.

26 posted on 02/05/2013 7:25:14 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

It seems the statists equate small govt with pedophilia, homosexuality, polygamy, etc. etc. etc.


27 posted on 02/05/2013 7:33:51 PM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
The reason that "some" parts of the libertarian agenda -- i.e. the major parts that flow directly and consistently from libertarian core principles, like totally dismantling the welfare state for instance -- are harder to attain, is precisely that the country is moving leftward TOWARDS nannystatism and AWAY from small-government libertarianism. I know you know this, which makes your willful category errors pretty annoying.
28 posted on 02/05/2013 7:37:53 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

The reality is that libertarianism has an agenda, and that agenda has advanced incredibly over the last 50 years.

Libertarians are an incredibly dishonest bunch and will lie about most of what they stand for and fight for, and believe in, in an effort to always shape their cultish arguments for whichever audience they are speaking to.

Here is the leftists agenda hidden behind the Libertarian Party curtain.

Libertarian Party Platform:

Throw open the borders completely; only a rare individual (terrorist, disease carrier etc.) can be kept from freedom of movement through “political boundaries”.

Homosexuals; total freedom in the military, gay marriage, adoption, child custody and everything else.

Abortion; zero restrictions or impediments.

Pornography; no restraint, no restrictions.

Drugs; Meth, Heroin, Crack, and anything new that science can come up with, zero restrictions.

Advertising those drugs, prostitution, and pornography; zero restrictions.

Military Strength; minimal capabilities.


29 posted on 02/05/2013 7:48:03 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Yes. They certainly will be.


30 posted on 02/05/2013 7:48:24 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Gays are just looking at the shapeless, broken heap of disjointed pieces of the-thing-that-used-to-be-called-marriage, and saying, "Oh, look, there's a piece I like. You're mean if you don't let me have it."

Too sadly true.

31 posted on 02/05/2013 7:48:36 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

True libertarians support pedophilia, but they would change the name and just call it liberty, and explain that the people who created the nation were for it.

“Libertarian purists, however, don’t plan to be locked in the attic like a crazy aunt. Case in point: last month’s child-porn-gate.

The fracas started with Mary J. Ruwart, the candidate with perhaps the deepest, purest libertarian roots (her rejection of government is so complete that some party moderates have begun warning of the anarchical dangers of “Ruwarchy”). In April, a rival called her out for her thoughts in a 1999 book called Short Answers to the Tough Questions. “Children who willingly participate in sexual acts have the right to make that decision as well, even if it’s distasteful to us personally,” Ruwart wrote. “When we outlaw child pornography, the prices paid for child performers rise, increasing the incentives for parents to use children against their will.”

Ruwart’s is a classic libertarian take — a defense of free will (even for “child performers”) and an attack on government prohibitions of any kind. It’s also political poison. As libertarian blogger Steve Newton put it, Ruwart and her allies run the risk of turning the party into “the poster child for NAMBLA and the aluminum hat brigade.”

The party’s executive director, Shane Cory, saw the danger as well, and rushed out a press release titled, “Libertarians call for increased communication to combat child pornography.” Cory was attacked by hardliners who saw the release as an endorsement of increased federal prosecuting power. The party refused to vote on a resolution asking states to strongly enforce existing child porn laws. Cory resigned in protest, depriving a party in the midst of what may be its most promising election season of one of its most able organizers and fund raisers. But for many libertarian faithful, adherence to the most rigid of principles always trumps practical considerations about how those principles might be more broadly observed.”


32 posted on 02/05/2013 7:51:25 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

bump

Even a forum I was a part of was full of liberturdians wanting it to be “decriminalized”.

But its happening, slowly, because of the media, Hollyweird and government schools.


33 posted on 02/05/2013 8:05:03 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: the scotsman

No longer ‘Great’ is Britain.


34 posted on 02/05/2013 8:06:27 PM PST by tflabo (Truth or Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Even a forum I was a part of was full of liberturdians wanting it to be “decriminalized”.

Libertarians do not reject conservatism because we disagree about economics.

35 posted on 02/05/2013 8:10:07 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Your assertions about ‘True libertarians’ are irresponsible, reckless, and defamatory.


36 posted on 02/05/2013 8:10:23 PM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
That is simply not true. Much of the libertarian agenda has not advanced, namely the parts that center on limiting the power of government -- which, again, happen to be the parts that follow most consistently from libertarianism's basic principles. Your cherrypicking doesn't change that.
37 posted on 02/05/2013 8:14:08 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I reject libertarianism because it is utopian and unrealistic


38 posted on 02/05/2013 8:17:12 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Get real, huge swaths of the libertarian agenda has come to be, I never said anything about all of it.

All of it CAN’T pass, because it is childish, contradictory nonsense, open borders, drugs, the homosexual agenda, porn and the collapse of society brings in and creates MORE anti-conservative voters, not fewer, so conservatism loses ground while the hard left portions of libertarianism advance like a raging river.

I’m not cherry picking anything, I am pointing out where libertarians succeed.


39 posted on 02/05/2013 8:21:50 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Maybe, but it’s not the enemy.


40 posted on 02/05/2013 8:22:26 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Of course you’re cherrypicking. You dishonestly ignore the huge part of libertarianism centers on limiting the power of government and dismantling the welfare state, because you’ve got some kind of axe to grind.


41 posted on 02/05/2013 8:24:43 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

True libertarians embrace libertarianism.

“Libertarian purists, however, don’t plan to be locked in the attic like a crazy aunt. Case in point: last month’s child-porn-gate”

“The fracas started with Mary J. Ruwart, the candidate with perhaps the deepest, purest libertarian roots”

“Ruwart’s is a classic libertarian take — a defense of free will (even for “child performers”) and an attack on government prohibitions of any kind.”

“The party’s executive director, Shane Cory, saw the danger as well, and rushed out a press release titled, “Libertarians call for increased communication to combat child pornography.” Cory was attacked by hardliners who saw the release as an endorsement of increased federal prosecuting power. The party refused to vote on a resolution asking states to strongly enforce existing child porn laws.”


42 posted on 02/05/2013 8:25:13 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Conservatives fight big government and for dismantling the welfare state, it is what they are known for, libertarians don’t reject conservatism over those issues, they reject conservatism over the issues that I keep revealing, and which the libs have made such incredible gains for 50 years.

Homosexuality, drugs, abortion, gay marriage, porn, open borders, etc.

The formal text of the Libertarian Party Platform on immigration. I think it says it all, do you see the end of welfare, smaller government, a reduction of social programs, the end of the democrat party in this immigration agenda?

COMPLETE PLATFORM TEXT
INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND CIVIL ORDER

IMMIGRATION:
“”The Issue: We welcome all refugees to our country and condemn the efforts of U.S. officials to create a new “Berlin Wall” which would keep them captive. We condemn the U.S. government’s policy of barring those refugees from our country and preventing Americans from assisting their passage to help them escape tyranny or improve their economic prospects.

The Principle: We hold that human rights should not be denied or abridged on the basis of nationality. Undocumented non-citizens should not be denied the fundamental freedom to labor and to move about unmolested. Furthermore, immigration must not be restricted for reasons of race, religion, political creed, age or sexual preference. We oppose government welfare and resettlement payments to non-citizens just as we oppose government welfare payments to all other persons.

Solutions: We condemn massive roundups of Hispanic Americans and others by the federal government in its hunt for individuals not possessing required government documents. We strongly oppose all measures that punish employers who hire undocumented workers. Such measures repress free enterprise, harass workers, and systematically discourage employers from hiring Hispanics.

Transitional Action: We call for the elimination of all restrictions on immigration, the abolition of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and the Border Patrol, and a declaration of full amnesty for all people who have entered the country illegally.””


43 posted on 02/05/2013 8:33:24 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick; GeronL

If you are conservative, libertarians are the enemy, if you are a leftist, then they are your ally.

They will gladly open our borders to a world of democrat voters and let them have their dope, abortions, and gay marriage, and pedophilia, as long as you let them fantasize about it somehow resulting in voters who want to give themselves fewer goodies and who suddenly put down the crack pipe and vote like right wing conservatives on economic issues.


44 posted on 02/05/2013 8:39:33 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

yes it is the enemy of civilization


45 posted on 02/05/2013 8:52:57 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Conservatives fight big government and for dismantling the welfare state, it is what they are known for, libertarians don’t reject conservatism over those issues..

Yeah, exactly. They agree with conservatives on those issues. And those issues aren't just small things. They are at the center of what libertarianism is about. Which makes it pretty obvious that libertarians aren't liberals.

do you see the end of welfare, smaller government, a reduction of social programs, the end of the democrat party in this immigration agenda?

Of course not. You have to look at the part of the platform where those issues are actually covered. For instance in the section on healthcare:

We favor restoring and reviving a free market health care system. We recognize the freedom of individuals to determine the level of health insurance they want (if any), the level of health care they want, the care providers they want, the medicines and treatments they will use and all other aspects of their medical care, including end-of-life decisions. People should be free to purchase health insurance across state lines.

Or the income tax:

All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. We call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We oppose any legal requirements forcing employers to serve as tax collectors. Government should not incur debt, which burdens future generations without their consent. We support the passage of a "Balanced Budget Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes.

Or entitlements:

Retirement planning is the responsibility of the individual, not the government. Libertarians would phase out the current government-sponsored Social Security system and transition to a private voluntary system. The proper and most effective source of help for the poor is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals. We believe members of society will become more charitable and civil society will be strengthened as government reduces its activity in this realm.

Or firearms:

The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression. This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by any other individual or group. We affirm the individual right recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense. We oppose all laws at any level of government requiring registration of, or restricting, the ownership, manufacture, or transfer or sale of firearms or ammunition.

Or the redistribution of wealth:

Libertarians want all members of society to have abundant opportunities to achieve economic success. A free and competitive market allocates resources in the most efficient manner. Each person has the right to offer goods and services to others on the free market. The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society.

Read it and weep, Mr. Cherrypicker.
46 posted on 02/05/2013 8:55:16 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
If you are conservative, libertarians are the enemy, if you are a leftist, then they are your ally.

Total BS.

47 posted on 02/05/2013 8:56:27 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

And you’re a nutty one too.


48 posted on 02/05/2013 8:57:09 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric
It seems the statists equate small govt with pedophilia, homosexuality, polygamy, etc. etc. etc.

What do you expect them to do -- honestly defend their love of Big Brother?

49 posted on 02/05/2013 8:57:09 PM PST by fractionated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

Totally true, conservatives are against abortion, gay marriage, homosexualizing the military, open borders, closing border controls and the INS, homosexual adoption, polygamy and pedophilia openly advertising heroin and porn, and so many of the other things that libertarians were formed to promote and fight for.

If you are conservative, libertarians are the enemy, if you are a leftist, then they are your ally.


50 posted on 02/05/2013 9:01:12 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is a longtime supporter of homosexualizing the Boy Scouts (and the military).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson