Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread...(sort of)
ROCKLOBSTER

Posted on 02/03/2013 8:13:28 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER

OK, somebody has to do it. Where else will we turn?


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: alasbabylon; sundayaddiction
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last
Not sure what is up with Alas_babylon...hoping he's OK.
1 posted on 02/03/2013 8:13:33 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; Girlene; bray; rodguy911; TomGuy; Fishtalk; kabar

Not the same...but here’s a blank canvas.


2 posted on 02/03/2013 8:16:07 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

My Sunday Morning News shows are over now. I’ll try to post some stuff from memory. Martin Dempsey (Chairman Joint Chiefs) was on with Panetta on NBC. F Chuck Todd was sitting in doing the hosting. Regarding the Hagel mess this week, it seems Dempsey was one of the people helping him prepare for the hearing.

LOL, why does that not surprise me?


3 posted on 02/03/2013 8:18:39 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Be careful, however, that the exercise of your Freedom does not become a stumbling block to the weak. 1 Cor 8:9

What if everything about evolution is a lie? This would mean everything built on the theory of evolution is a fraud too. One of the primary gaps evolutionists never want to discuss is where life began? They have two primary theories, it either randomly developed from the primordial soup of came from another universe on an asteroid. Neither of these theories is believable yet the entire theory of evolution is built on them even though the odds are around one in infinity.

There is a huge void in scientific explanation how life and evolution started so most scientists dismiss it as not important or in any need of explanation or proof. They say there was a Big Bang when nothing became something and then exploded into an explosion creating the universe according to all of their infallible models. After billions and billions of years, life magically, oops, scientifically appeared to begin the evolutionary chain. The only explanation the Darwinists have for life beginning is time rather than God. For evolutionists God is to be mocked while billions and billions of years is a serious explanation.

If you ask an evolutionist how life began they will immediately tell you that how life began is not a part of evolution. If you continue to ax the question they will either call you all types of names the worst of which is Christian or explain how only scientists understand how life began. It usually comes down to their ability to intimidate and bully people and even fellow scientists into backing down from the obvious black hole of life’s beginning. They will usually begin their virtual firing squad for anyone daring to question the beginning of life as subhuman and not part of academia’s Holy of Holies.

Their primary explanation is the primordial soup explanation. After the Big Bang and the earth formed with millions of years of volcanoes and flowing lava when the hydrogen and oxygen combined to form water and the cooling began. Randomly the earth just happened to circle the sun at exactly the right orbit and rotation to make the water the perfect temperature for life. Then a few million years ago the chemicals randomly formed amino acids turning into some type of primitive bacteria and billions of years later that bacteria is making laptops.

The problem with this theory is how complex that random event had to be. As scientists become more and more familiar with amino acids and DNA they are finding it is far more complex than they ever knew it was. The genetic codes are still ninety eight percent unexplained as they find more and more unexplainable pieces of the complexity it points less and less to a random act. They were dismissing the unexplained parts as Junk DNA pieces since they have only been able to identify less than 2% of DNA code and invented the term junk for the rest. This should be insulting to their intelligence and certainly to ours. As they get deeper and deeper into the DNA code they are finding that there is no junk in the code and more complexity making the randomness even less possible. Simply Google junk DNA and find out the lies are being exposed by those brave enough to question science. It would take trillions and trillions of years for a DNA helix to form randomly not simply billions. http://www.psrast.org/junkdna.htm

Their second explanation which is not as universally accepted but basically a fallback theory is the amino acids and life source came from space. This was developed when they realized their primordial soup explanation really didn’t hold water. So they developed the asteroid explanation that a life seed came from a distant solar system billions of light years away and fell to the earth at just the right time and apparently into the ocean after it survived the billion year trip in a vacuum and thousand degree temps during entry into our atmosphere. The obvious questions are where did it come from and is the solar system it came from more or less superior than ours. It is ok to believe there are life forms on other planets but it is not ok to believe there is a God.

Simply because a scientist says over billions of years and billions of chances can make something happen does not make it so. This is only a theory but one that really does not withstand the smell test when you think about it. Fortunately for evolution, scientists generally refuse to question any of their theories and rely on consensus to verify and vilify their earth sized holes in their theories. They have had to fight for this theory so completely and ignore so many craters it has become more of a magic show than science. They use smoke and mirrors to keep people from asking the important questions or demanding an explanation of why those odds are looking more like infinity to one than the truth.

Imagine if scientists spent as much time, energy and money trying to find out if God is real than trying to disprove God. Science has become a religion based on an atheistic belief that we began as nothing and when we die we go back to nothing. It is a religion that places all of its faith in evolution with no explanation of how life arrived but when it came, random chance and mutations has got us to the point man can think, read and write. They have replaced God with billions and billions of years so time is the miracle of our creation. What is the difference between their faith in billions of years and faith in God?

Evolution became the first agenda driven junk science of the modern world. Science is basically following a 19th century idea which if they were true scientists would have been disproved millions of times over but the politics won’t allow it. They need to have people turn from God to force their hope and trust in the gummit. They need the people to believe gummit is their god where all of their hope exists.

If people would put their faith and hope in God they would not need the gummit and most of its controls. If people were saved by Jesus Christ and believed he is where all hope exists there would be a heaven beyond this earth, something the Darwinists can’t offer. If there is a heaven and hell and Jesus saves us sinners from that torture we deserve then we wouldn’t need gummit to regulate our lives as we would simply follow the rules set in the Bible. This is the communists’ greatest fear that people would be free to live their lives as they wish without their absolute control.

Imagine if science were to investigate the marvel of God’s creation and how it so miraculously relates together rather than attempting to use his design as proof there is no God? Science could actually be a positive to most lives rather than its need to be god and repeatedly use its power to control our lives with all of their junk science decrees. You can see all the failures of science everywhere you look so why do we continue to believe evolution with all of its massive gaps? It is time to evolve from evolution.

Pray for Alas Babylon


4 posted on 02/03/2013 8:19:44 AM PST by bray (Welcome to Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER; All

FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Wayne LaPierre NRA CEO and Executive VP, CAPT Mark Kelly (USN Ret) husband of former Arizona Congress Woman gabby Giffords

MEET THE PRESS (NBC):Outgoing SecDef Leon Paneetta and CJCS GEN Martin Dempsey, Bob Costas

FACE THE NATION (CBS): NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell

THIS WEEK (ABC): Senator harry Reid (D-NV)

STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Outgoing SecDef Leon Paneetta and CJCS GEN Martin Dempsey


5 posted on 02/03/2013 8:24:37 AM PST by txradioguy (Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

Chris Wallace had on Space Shuttle Commander Mark E. Kelly, the husband of Gabby Giffords. Talking about their proposal for gun control.

Next they had on Wayne LaPierre from the NRA...Wallace beating on him for opposing unConstitional gun control measures.

Panel talked about the painfully embarrassing Senate confirmation hearing of former NE Senator Chuck Hagel who didn’t seem to know diddly. He will be confirmed.


6 posted on 02/03/2013 8:25:40 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate Republicans Freed the Slaves Month)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

On Fox his morning, I noticed the sharp contrast on how Chris Wallace questioned Capt Kelly and Wayne LaPierre. He lobbed softballs to Kelly and was confrontational with LaPierre. It was a hit job.


7 posted on 02/03/2013 8:26:51 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bray

Thanks for another brilliant post, Bray.

Certainly hope A.B. is OK.


8 posted on 02/03/2013 8:27:38 AM PST by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Chris Wallace debating Wayne LaPierre, not interviewing, with a bias slant was unforgivable.

FU Chris Wallace! You lost what little credibility you had.


10 posted on 02/03/2013 8:29:07 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (The amount of ammo you need is determined after the gunfight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER; PaleoBob; Happy Rain; Bernard; altura; cajungirl; shalom aleichem; Diogenesis; ...

I’ll ping to a few more. Pinging a few of you that participated in last week’ comments.


11 posted on 02/03/2013 8:29:42 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

It’s too bad Brit Hume wouldn’t come out of retirement and take Chris’s chair away from him.


12 posted on 02/03/2013 8:30:17 AM PST by txradioguy (Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

FNS

Watching Wallace interview/interrogate LaPierre (NRA VP) was unbelievable. Wallace used every hyperbolic comment he could muster to dissuade LaPierre. In addition to his frequent motor-boat interruptions [”but but but”], Wallace made no attempt to be object and blatantly kept bringing up the position of the anti-gun lobby.


13 posted on 02/03/2013 8:33:58 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy

Chris Wallace is a disgrace. He let Kelly slide on every Libtard talking point.

If “common sense” gun control was a drinking game I’d be too wasted to watch the Super Bowl.

FOX needs to fire his ass.


14 posted on 02/03/2013 8:34:37 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (The amount of ammo you need is determined after the gunfight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

“FOX needs to fire his ass.”

AMEN! And send little Shemp Smith with him.


15 posted on 02/03/2013 8:36:18 AM PST by txradioguy (Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Jackass Wallace kept cutting off LaPierre every answer he gave. What a prick!


16 posted on 02/03/2013 8:36:42 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (The amount of ammo you need is determined after the gunfight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

*ping*


17 posted on 02/03/2013 8:38:26 AM PST by txradioguy (Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy

FOX deserves a higher standard.


18 posted on 02/03/2013 8:38:53 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (The amount of ammo you need is determined after the gunfight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Thanks, ROCKLOBSTER. I watched NBC instead of catching FOX this am.

So is Mark Gifford (I don’t include Gabby, since she has a long way to go (bless her heart) before I believe a position she takes is her own) going along with Feinstein’s crazy proposals?

People who have gone through such a horrific tragedy are always put at the center of these discussions (if their views match the media’s). It is sad to see them being used.


19 posted on 02/03/2013 8:42:27 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

I agree. But they are doing their damndest right now to erode their 12 year reign at the top of the cable news ratings.

Shemp Smith doing more commentary than straight (no pun intended) news reporting on Studio B...BOR having idiots like George Stephanopolis onhis show to spout the DNC talking points almost unchallenged...and hiring Dennis Kook-cinich and letting Bob Beckel and his F Bomb dropping self run wild all over the airwaves. And then there’s Skeletor showing up as a panelisst allthe time. All these loser Dems hired by Newscorp is turning the place into CNN-lite.


20 posted on 02/03/2013 8:43:46 AM PST by txradioguy (Republicans Don't Need A Back Bench...They Need a BACKBONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson