Skip to comments.Why Are Black "Leaders" Anti Gun ?
Posted on 02/02/2013 11:44:36 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
Good YouTube video from a black man about gun control.
If anyone thinks that tyranny can be fought just by voting, then they need to seriously think about what a tyrannical state can be. It isn’t just one man ruling arbitrarily, it can be a tyranny of the majority against a minority. The history of black people in this country is reason enough for any clear thinking individual to understand what can happen when a majority can run over a minority’s rights.
Why Are Black “Leaders” Anti Gun ?
Because they do not know the KKK were democrats.. and don’t want to know..
And do what the democrat party Honkeys tell them to do..
Because they do not know the KKK were democrats.. and dont want to know..
And do what the democrat party Honkeys tell them to do..”
Bingo, spot on. Some people in my office are so pro obummer, just blatantly in your face about it. When I point out the Klan, Jim Crow laws, anti civil rights, etc all being the legacy of democRATS, they refuse to discuss it.
When obummer was going to be sworn in, I happily pointed out how amazing it was that he was using a republicans bible. “What chu talking bout?”
Lincoln was a republican!
They hated that, will not admit it.
You can also have a tyranny of a minority. Today a black can cite the smallest affront and charge one with being a racist which can destroy one’s career or reputation.
Condi Rice gets it.
Any black “leaders” who favor gun control should read her words and rethink their support for it.
Today a black can cite the smallest affront and charge one with being a racist which can destroy ones career or reputation.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thats genuine fascism. And it has no place in America. It will cause us to fight.Black Nationalism and Socilaims of redistribution, historic “justice” etc, have taken over what was a free nation.
Who wants to live under such tyranny?
Because “black” is more about ideology than about racial heritage. Otherwise, Bill Clinton would not have been the first black president.
” Because black is more about ideology than about racial heritage. Otherwise, Bill Clinton would not have been the first black president. “
... and Hillary, our first black First Lady.
They are the "House Negroes" of the Liberal Plantation, and they do or say anything they think the Man in the Big White House wants them to do, hoping for favorable treatment.
Moore let this slip and the media and Democrats freaked out. They were gathering momentum in the gun control debate before he said this.
An Obama tan, the result of standing constantly in the radiant beam from the one, is now more valuable than an “I marched with Martin” campaign ribbon
They do not like to hear MLK was a Republican, either.
“Because black is more about ideology than about racial heritage. Otherwise, Bill Clinton would not have been the first black president.”
It’s both and it’s neither. It’s ignorance. Or as my son would say, it’s “crab in the bucket syndrome.” As a crab climbs out of the bucket to get his freedom, instead of following him out, the other crabs pull him back down.
The guy that made the video, Mr Colionnoir, has several pro 2nd amendment videos out. I recommend watching them all. He is well spoken, right on point, and even a bit dryly sarcastic to the left.
Black “Leaders” are owned by the Democrat Party. They only keep their place at the table of power by delivering votes. I bet ordinary black Americans are not “anti-gun”.
Because they want to keep blacks on the Democrat’s Welfare Plantation; where the money is, the power is. Independent blacks that don’t need welfare cannot be controlled by them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.