Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Up to $25M welfare waste
http://bostonherald.com ^ | 01/31/2013 | Chris Cassidy

Posted on 01/31/2013 11:32:07 AM PST by massmike

Bay State taxpayers are doling out a staggering $25 million a year to welfare recipients who may not even be eligible to collect, according to a blistering new report from one of the state’s top fraud fighters.

The report, focused on families with at least one child, 
estimated that almost 10 percent of the 51,311 families on welfare are able to collect benefits from the Department of Transitional 
Assistance without having to provide the right documentation.

The inspector general’s eye-opening study found the welfare department is awarding benefits to recipients who:

• work outside jobs — a welfare violation that wastes $4.4 million in taxpayer dough. In one case, DTA never bothered investigating a tip that one woman was running a day care center out of her home.

• hold more than the $2,500 maximum assets — a lapse in DTA oversight that costs taxpayers $2.2 million. One welfare 
recipient was even the landlord of a housing unit, collecting $1,000 a month rent.

• fail to provide adequate proof of residency — another DTA snafu costing the state 
$4.4 million. In one staggering example, a recipient listing his address simply as a P.O. box was allowed to collect. Another was able to claim their child who went to school in Puerto Rico.

• fail to prove their child was even related to them — a blunder costing $7.4 million.

• never proved their citizenship or immigration status — 
another hit costing $5.2 million.

• submitted false or misleading information about a spouse they claimed to be absent — 
$2.9 million. In some cases, women signed affidavits claiming the father was never around, only to have a subsequent child with the same man.

The total comes to $26.5 million, but the audit wrote off 
$1.5 million because of over­lapping categories.

(Excerpt) Read more at bostonherald.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: welfare

1 posted on 01/31/2013 11:32:10 AM PST by massmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: massmike
In some cases, women signed affidavits claiming the father was never around, only to have a subsequent child with the same man.

Well, he just dropped in for a few minutes..............to say hello........

2 posted on 01/31/2013 11:42:47 AM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Liberal response:

"But it's for the children!"

And, if that doesn't work:

"At least we liberals are trying!"

And..... if that fails, a straw man argument:

"At least we're not paying $400 for a toilet seat!"

3 posted on 01/31/2013 12:34:41 PM PST by jeffc (The U.S. media are our enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Probably add a zero to the end of that 25M.


4 posted on 01/31/2013 12:47:44 PM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

CA spends 34B on welfare making 25M a teeny tiny fraction. So I am not believing this. Welfare fraud is a lot hight that this.


5 posted on 01/31/2013 12:53:47 PM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massmike

ONLY $25 million?
I’d say they’re doing a pretty good job...


6 posted on 01/31/2013 1:04:55 PM PST by Little Ray (Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va
CA spends 34B on welfare making 25M a teeny tiny fraction. So I am not believing this. Welfare fraud is a lot hight that this.

I believe it. I believe this is just fraud in MA. Libs claim that there is no fraud worth looking for, yet every time someone manages to look they find fraud makes up a significant fraction of the payout.

7 posted on 01/31/2013 1:16:10 PM PST by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fraxinus

25M IS NOT a significant amount of 35B. Something is wrong. No program has a 1/10 of 1 percent fraud rate. IT SHOULD BE a lot higher. The figures are a lie. Again CA spends 35B A YEAR on welfare. A ten percent fraud rate would be 3.5B. My guess 10 percent is low....


8 posted on 01/31/2013 1:30:22 PM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: massmike

Those numbers are trivial and grossly understate the real situation.

Here in Indiana, a tv station got a digital file of where TANF cards were swiped to get cash money.

Vegas, Hawaii, Disney (Fl and Ca), Puerto Rico, Nevada brothels, etc, etc.

Welfare fraud is as widespread as members of Congress making “market crushing” returns from inside trading.


9 posted on 01/31/2013 1:36:23 PM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

This was a study of one program in MA, thus the amount CA spends on welfare is the wrong amount to be comparing it to. They found a 10% fraud rate in this one program. I would be unsurprised to find that people defrauding this are also defrauding other welfare programs.


10 posted on 01/31/2013 2:26:27 PM PST by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: central_va
CA spends 34B on welfare making 25M a teeny tiny fraction. So I am not believing this. Welfare fraud is a lot hight that this.

1. This is Massachusetts, not California and their total welfare spending is far less than $34 billion that California spends.

2. No matter how "teeny tiny" the fraction is, $25 million is being wasted/defrauded from the taxpayers. Any reduction in that amount is a positive step.

11 posted on 01/31/2013 2:34:59 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: massmike
Hasn't Deval been gaming the system all his life? (And not for a crummy $800 or $1200 a month in welfare.) Lie-a-watha gamed it only once (that we know of), but hit the jackpot! And consider America's first Affirmative Action Moocher-in-Chief . . . . You all can multiply examples of other esteemed public "servants."

I guess it's the "new normal" . . .

12 posted on 01/31/2013 3:39:51 PM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson