Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

NOTE: Peeps who are here without the specific consent of the United States are here unlawfully, so it’s like they really aren’t here ~ no visa, no visita ~ so they wouldn’t be covered under the Second

hahaha where did you get that idea from?


24 posted on 01/29/2013 1:27:31 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: rolling_stone
Second refers to 'people', but it also has an antecedent that says 'free state' and 'militia' ~ visitors without visas are not part of the peeps ~ they are part of somebody else's peeps and maybe even a foreign militia or foreign state ~ or maybe they're ENEMY ALIENS.

The USSC has not said that EVERYBODY is among the PEOPLE in every part of the Constitution BTW ~ just in some rulings, but not in others.

The point here is to get the Democrats in the House to vote AGAINST illegal aliens at the same time they vote for gun control! ~ or ~ vice versa!

27 posted on 01/29/2013 1:39:22 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson