“But resist we much… we must… muck… and we
will much… mulch… about… that… be committed.”
So Al - you're OK with requiring a voter ID, since “People do not have the right to unregulated rights in this country,” correct?
It wouldn't do any good to lecture Mr. Sharpton (I refuse to call him Reverend and insult real men of God) about intellectual consistency - he wouldn't understand the concept.
The good news is that Al Sharpton is simply is talking and no more. Just ignore him.
Al, you are exactly the kind of opportunistic power hungry {expletive} the founding fathers had in mind when they wrote the bill of rights. The bill of rights is there, thank God, to protect us from people like you.
The greasy headed one needs to be drug around a little for saying such things in an unregulated manner./s
5.56mm
Tell that to the Afghanis.
Give me 200 million armed civilians and they can have drones, and we'll see who wins.
First, most of our 1.5 million military will not fight their friends and relatives.
Next, those remaining -- those brown shirts -- must eat, must walk, must shop, must roam about...
Every trip they would be in the sights of a dozen or more rifles at any given moment.
I wonder if he was singing this tune during the 60’s civil rights protests.
Surely when his people were marching in the streets with shotguns. Right Mr. Sharpton?
LOS ANGELES, January 27, 2013 — Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) referred to the National Rifle Association as “venal” during an appearance on CNN’s State of the Union wth Candy Crowely.
“The NRA is venal. They come after you, they put together large amounts of money to defeat you,” she said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “They did this in ‘93, and they intend to continue it.”
Feinstein claims the NRA, any by default its members, are the biggest “stumbling block” when it comes to passing her broad gaun.
Read more: http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/tygrrrr-express/2013/jan/27/holocaust-remembrance-day-dianne-feinstein-calls-n/#ixzz2JHJFFxKC
Follow us: @wtcommunities on Twitter
“unregulated rights” - what a maroon....Abe Lincoln might have even punched Sharpton in the face for the iodicy pouring out of his mouth...lol
He can take his drone and shove it up his greasy.....oh wait, he’d probably like that!!!
“‘People do not have the right to unregulated rights in this country’
Communists do not have the right to live in this country.
Here’s the “logic” that I saw him using:
The police state has become so powerful in the age of drones that it is pointless to resist, so there is no reason for you to maintain the means to resist.
Introduce a law saying “BLACKS” can’t own guns and watch him squeal like a stuck pig.
“But resist we much… we must… muck… and we
will much… mulch… about… that… be committed.”
Why because the white democratic crooks promote the dimmest bulb black politicians so they are not threatened. They did it in Chicago, they went after the compentant black man who was running for mayor, but to throw a sop to the black political establishment they put two literally crazy black women into the race. Lets say one day Sharpton goes off the plantation, that will be the day the NYTs lets us know that sharpton is sympathetic to the black violent racist Zebra cult.
More pearls of wisdom from that paragon of virtue, Tawana Sharpton.
>>“People do not have the right to unregulated rights in this country,” (Said) Sharpton<<
So what part of Sharpton’s 13th Amendment rights should be regulated?
“People do not have the right to unregulated rights in this country”.
Kinda depends on what you mean by “unregulated rights”, or more particularly by “unregulated”.
One person’s rights end where another person’s rights begin.
As people say, “A person’s right to swing his fist ends where another person’s nose begins.”
As they forget to say, “A person’s right to locate his nose ends where another person is swinging his fist.”
Some sort of regulation, even if it is self regulation is implied.
(rant)
Too many of us concede the left’s definition of things.
We object to the words “collective” or “collectively” because the left started using the terms “collective” and “collectivism”, even though none of us do everything individually. We do some things with others, in other words we do them “collectively”.
We bridle at the term “social justice” because the left uses it, but as I recall the term was first used by some Catholic priest or monk before Marxism.
The left steals the language and gets knee jerk reactions from us because we concede to their definitions, while the massive “undecided” look at us askance because they don’t see the words the same as we do, or the same as the leftists do.
(/rant)
HEY “Reverend” say HI TO TAWANA BRAWLEY......
