Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Abuse of Power (ruling potentially invalidates dozens of NLRB decisions)
Wall Street Journal ^ | 1/25/13

Posted on 01/27/2013 3:55:17 AM PST by Libloather

Meantime, the ruling potentially invalidates dozens of NLRB decisions since the illegal recess appointments were made. A similar mess occurred in 2010 when the Supreme Court ruled in New Process Steel v. NLRB that some 600 decisions made by the NLRB without a three-member quorum were invalid.

The decision also means that Mr. Cordray has no authority to run the consumer financial bureau, which has been busy issuing thousands of pages of regulations since he was illegally imposed in the job. Mr. Obama renominated Mr. Cordray this week, which is an insult to the Senate and after this ruling to the Constitution too.

One question is whether Mr. Cordray can legally keep accepting his paycheck. Especially as a former Attorney General in Ohio, he ought to resign for having agreed to play along as a constitutional usurper.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abuse; court; dnctreason; obama; obamatreason; power; treason; typicaldnctreason
In a particular surprise, two of the three judges also ruled that recess appointments are only allowed to fill vacancies that arise during the time the Senate is in actual recess. This has not been the recent practice, and it means that Presidents could not wait, say, until a recess in December to appoint a controversial replacement for a Secretary of State who resigned in October.

I wonder if Hussein knows this.

1 posted on 01/27/2013 3:55:32 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Amazingly, only one of the three major network “news” programs reported this ruling.

See, if they don’t report it...maybe it didn’t happen.


2 posted on 01/27/2013 3:58:48 AM PST by kjo (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Major network news is simply the propaganda arm of the Democratic party.


3 posted on 01/27/2013 4:17:19 AM PST by Shane (When Injustice Becomes Law, RESISTANCE Becomes DUTY.----T.Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

His imperial majesty, comrade el presidente messiah prince sheik caliph Barrack Hussein Obama (mmm, mmm, mmm) the First is not worried that these Neanderthals have decided against his Holy See of Washington. Rest assured his eminence is fully aware that his new best bud, John Roberts, can find a way to twist the illegal into legal. Roberts has history of being able to perform such minor miracles since being endowed with the spirit of collectivism emanating and flowing forth from the loins of the shining angel of light who so graciously ascended from his netherworld to be our leader.


4 posted on 01/27/2013 4:20:43 AM PST by cashless (Obama told us he would side with Muslims if the political winds shifted in an ugly direction. Ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Comply? More likely, the effect of the ruling
is that the Judge and his family and staff
will be audited OR simply disappear or be pushed
to suicide by the DO”J”.


5 posted on 01/27/2013 4:28:44 AM PST by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo
Yeah, the C-Span morning moonbat show, “Washington Journal” is ignoring it as well. If the Compost, Slimes, Politico generally ignore a story, they won't touch it.
6 posted on 01/27/2013 4:46:10 AM PST by Jacquerie ("How few were left who had seen the republic!" - Tacitus, The Annals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The Senate does not mind being insulted by Obama, Probably because the Senate is an insult to the Constitution, It’s leader an insult to every bright minded citizen and an embarrassment to our country.

Do you mean the same Senate that intends to change the rules so they can push through Legislation with a vote of 51? That Senate.? Hoew can you insult Harry Reid? Let me know I would love to do it.


7 posted on 01/27/2013 4:46:57 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I take it to mean that businesses are not bound by the NLRB rulings and can simply just not comply. There will be no static because the noncompliance will be so extensive enforcement won’t be possible.

In the posts above, it is alluded the Scotus will over turn but they will not even hear the case and will accept the DC Court of Appeals ruling.


8 posted on 01/27/2013 4:53:05 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

It was a three person panel.


9 posted on 01/27/2013 6:14:23 AM PST by Mercat (Never laugh at live dragons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Mr. Cordray has no authority to run the consumer financial bureau, which has been busy issuing thousands of pages of regulations since he was illegally imposed in the job.

This is the real tyranny. Issuing 1000's of pages of regulations. If wishes came true, the constitution should be amended to prohibit Congress from shirking its duty of making laws and regulations to the executive branch AND to make laws no longer than a signle 8-1/2x11" sheet in #8 font AND to prohibit circle-jerk language in the bills they make.

10 posted on 01/27/2013 8:34:24 AM PST by VRW Conspirator (Sometimes it takes calamity to lead to serenity - FReeper RacerX1128)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
That description by the judges is understandable given the exact text of the Constitution. . .

The President shall have power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

11 posted on 01/27/2013 2:52:28 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson