Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Travis McGee

Travis, One might say yes to the following situations:

1) The only need for civilian ownership of firearms is for hunting

2) The left is afraid of the right and therefore wishes to limit their legal right to own certain firearms

3) A socialist government has the responsibility to restrict the ownership of firearms to maintain public order and saftey

4) There is no need for the average citizen to own firearms in a socialist state.

As a country we have seen the socialist’s ever creeping agenda with respect to civilian firearms ownership since the 1930s. The socialists have never told the truth about their true agenda when it comes to civilian firearms ownership and they never will.

However, the socialists in U.S. must feel that they are fairly close to achieving their primary goal. Their primary goal being suspension of the U.S. Constitution and the establishment of a socialist state. The obvious reason for government control of civilian firearms ownership is the prevention of resistance to a socialist coup d’etat. No other reason truthfully exists.


48 posted on 01/25/2013 4:48:41 PM PST by .44 Special (Taimid Buarch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: .44 Special

Of course, yes.


55 posted on 01/26/2013 4:44:13 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson