What a dumb horses butt....
Criminals will just carry more clips/magazines or they will carry more weapons on them....
Not to mention anyone with decent sheet metal working rigs will be able to create/modify new high capacties and those people will of course be criminals and won’t give a crap about breaking slow joe’s laws...
So, what Biden is saying is that it’s OK for “civilians” to be “outgunned by criminals” but not the police?
Lack of laws is not the problem. And more laws are not the solution.
See, Joe? Not so hard.
If we didn’t finance Planned Parentlesshood, there would most likely be millions more children alive today.
bobo
Hmmm.. what guns and magazines do we want to make exclusive to criminals....
Of course!
If Lanza had to take that extra 2 seconds to change out a 10 round magazine, that’d given those 50 pound 6 year olds and the unarmed women teachers hiding in the closet a chance to rush him and take him down with their bare hands.
The ONLY priority is infringing on the rights of lawful gun owners so the Democrats can show their constituency that they are “doing something”.
We need severe restrictions on Joe Biden’s 1st Amendment rights.
***particularly for police who can be outgunned by criminals with assault weapons. ***
OUTGUNNED? Back in the early 1900s Harry Tracy broke out of prison and with just a 30-30 Winchester and a Colt revolver shot down around eleven lawmen and several civilians before he shot himself.
I don’t remember reading of any lawmen at that time crying about being “outgunned” or calling for a ban on 30-30s.
Biden’s a moron. There are still too many people of western culture in the USA to allow gun control to have any effect (see ingenuity). Hey, Biden, head someplace closer to the Equator. There, you might be able to more easily enforce dictatorships. Take your old feminist nags with you.
Using the “if it saves 1 life” argument is the sign of scoundrel. It also tells you that they think their plan wont have much of an impact. If it would save hundreds or thousands of lives, wouldnt they say that?
Yes. Lets also limit those clips in the guns that the SS use to protect your sorry a$$e$. One shot...make it count.
***WASHINGTON — Vice President Joe Biden said Thursday that he’s more concerned about limiting the number of rounds in a gun magazine than about banning assault weapons that account for a small percentage of gun deaths. ****
Back in the late 1960s a Viet Cong backwoods blacksmith could turn out a 30-40 round magazine for a captured M-16, using only a piece of sheet metal and a pair of tin snips.
And this idiot thinks a “ban” will fix things up? Americans have had extended magazines ever since rifles went to cartridges.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evans_Repeating_Rifle
And you thought the HENRY rifle holding 16 rounds was bad!
5.56mm
Dimwit Biden is not going to dictate how many rounds I am allowed to take into a gunfight that some a$$hole(s) has forced on me.
The time to consider if you may have taken too many rounds into a gunfight.... is AFTER it’s over, NOT before.
Obama and his administration may think it’s fine to stand down and leave our people behind and allow them to die, but, I will fight to the death for my loved ones and I will use any tool I have been forced to use.
Maybe if the principal had a Mossberg 500, 20 more kids would be alive.
This child killer would have been in jail, not killing children, had YOU Mr. Government done your job and enforced existing laws.
He lied on his Federal Form when he tried to buy a gun weeks before the incident.
How about the Gov’t actually enforcing the existing laws!