[Sender]

I am just curious, but if all 26 victims had been shot by a handgun, would they now be trying to ban handguns? I don’t think so. They waited for a crisis of opportunity to move on rifles. After they ban those, they will wait for a handgun crisis. And then a shotgun crisis. Etc.

[TribalPrincess2U]

Exactly!

[Trod Upon]

I think they are going for certain handguns. As for Lanza, it makes sense that he wouldn't switch weapons, but the idea that mag limits would have saved anyone is ridiculous. If he had been using three round magazines he still would have had more than enough time to do what he did, even if he had been using a handgun with three round magazines. It takes what, maybe two seconds to switch out a mag? The Democrats are just using these children to advance the totalitarian cause. Every reasonable person can understand that the way to stop these events is to actually defend the schools, but the fascists don't care. Oh, and I think the Fudds will be next on the hit list. I can hear it now: "They can hunt deer with single shot shotguns...nobody needs a scoped sniper rifle to hunt deer." People should use the next two years to at least double the number of ARs in civilian hands so as to drive the point home...no tyranny will arise in America, period.