Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rhode Island House easily passes gay marriage bill
Fox News ^ | January 24, 2013 | Fox News

Posted on 01/24/2013 5:36:59 PM PST by Alter Kaker

PROVIDENCE, R.I. – The Rhode Island House of Representatives on Thursday overwhelmingly passed legislation to allow gays and lesbians to marry in the only New England state where they can't.

The House voted 51-19 after an often emotional debate that touched on civil rights, religion and the nature of marriage. The bill now moves to the Senate, where both supporters and opponents of gay marriage say it is difficult to predict the bill's fate.

"This has been a long journey," said House Speaker Gordon Fox, who is gay and supported same-sex legislation when it was first introduced in 1997. "Today is a great day. Today ... we stand for equality, we stand for justice."

Thursday's vote posed the most significant challenge yet for gay marriage in Rhode Island. While the five other New England states already allow gay couples to marry, attempts have fallen flat in this heavily Catholic state.

"I wanted to be here to see it," said 70-year-old Warwick resident Ken Fish, who is gay. Fish showed up at the Statehouse hours early to ensure he had a seat in the crowded viewing gallery. "Go back 10 years, even five years, and I wasn't sure we'd ever get here. We're not done yet, but this is a big one."

Nine states and the District of Columbia now allow gay and lesbian couples to marry.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: Rhode Island
KEYWORDS: gay; homosexualagenda; marriage; rhodeisland; ri2013
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Cato in PA

The Lord will turn the earth into a giant nuclear reaction before he allows all of THAT..I suspect...

41 posted on 01/25/2013 8:31:52 AM PST by Rca2000 ( Still too shocked to have a tagline....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

Massachusetts and Rhode Island are ridiculous, but I think California might edge out Massachusetts, though it’s close.

42 posted on 01/25/2013 1:39:49 PM PST by MDLION ("Trust in the Lord with all your heart" -Proverbs 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

In our Constitutional Republic, the people of each state have to deal with their own stuff. You seem to implying that somehow this should be bumped up to the Feds (a disaster)? If not, then instead of criticizing what I’m saying, why don’t you offer your solution if it’s not the people of each state working these problems out for themselves?

43 posted on 01/25/2013 3:20:05 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
In the vast majority of instances, voters haven't made the choice, it's been forced on them by their 'representatives', or the courts.

You may have a point about the courts, but elected legislatures are normally the way we make laws in this country. There were no public referenda on enacting the income tax, declaring war on Japan in World War II, making marijuana illegal or making no-fault divorce legal.

44 posted on 01/25/2013 3:34:32 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
Including the (so-called) "National Cathedral" in Washington's historic, I believe Episcopal, although I'm not sure. It's the Church where there are pews reserved for the President(s), of whom almost all have attended services there, regardless of religious denomination.

I was sorry to hear in the course of the Inaugural Festivities that the "National Cathedral" was now offering/allowing same-sex marriages to take place there...if it was just some ordinary Church, or even an "ordinary" Cathedral, it would be a bit different.

The point being, nine states and D.C. do not constitute "national", and this Cathedral is not representing the nation. It's too bad, and I hope the Catholics in Rhode Island stand up for truly representing their constituents.

45 posted on 01/25/2013 4:07:27 PM PST by 88keys (tag line under construction: waiting for something positive to say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

That may be, but when public opinion is CLEARLY against an issue, and the courts and legislatures take it out of our hands, that is wrong. Sadly, too many people just let it go, thinking, well the law is passed, we can’t do anything about it, and don’t even vote against the legislator who voted against what his or her constituents wanted.

46 posted on 01/26/2013 9:58:23 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: WXRGina

“Rhode Island’s Governor Lincoln Chafee said he would veto a bill that was introduced that would have allowed the residents of Rhode Island to actually vote on whether or not they wanted fake marriage put into law.”

In the last 10 years, the Minnesota Legislature has approved public funding for a new professional baseball and a professional football stadium. Minnesota state law says that the residents of the county in which the stadium is going to be built are allowed to hold a referendum as to whether they want to be taxed.

In both cases, the legislature, after being pressured by the elites, stripped the referendum requirement from the bills - essentially letting the Legislature decide the matter. In both cases, these bills passed thru a GOP-controlled Legislature.

This type of elitist “we are sooo much smarter than you” thinking is not restricted only to the Democrats.

47 posted on 01/29/2013 7:32:57 AM PST by MplsSteve (General Mills is pro-gay marriage! Boycott their products!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
This type of elitist “we are sooo much smarter than you” thinking is not restricted only to the Democrats.

Right. The wormy Republicans are just as bad in many ways. Look at "Republican" Mayor Bloomberg for just one example.

48 posted on 01/29/2013 9:40:04 AM PST by WXRGina (Further up and further in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

And this is why they are what they are-they have a seared cauterized conscience,which leads to a reprobate mind,can’t get any planner then that...........

49 posted on 01/29/2013 9:02:29 PM PST by primrose (PRIMROSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson