Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dianne Feinstein Technically Broke DC Laws Displaying Assault Weapons
policymic.com ^ | January 24, 2013 | Christ Miles

Posted on 01/24/2013 1:55:35 PM PST by grundle

During Thursday's announcement of a new assault weapons ban, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) displayed guns as props during her. However, the guns on display break Washington, D.C., gun laws- as reported by CNN.

(Excerpt) Read more at policymic.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: guncontrol; secondamendment

1 posted on 01/24/2013 1:55:38 PM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

It has been reported that she got special prior permission from the DC police beforehand. Some people are more equal than others.


2 posted on 01/24/2013 1:58:25 PM PST by Obadiah (America is Babylon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Local police granted special dispensation to the annointed senator. Maybe we should all apply for such priveleges?


3 posted on 01/24/2013 2:02:40 PM PST by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
It has been reported that she got special prior permission from the DC police beforehand. Some people are more equal than others.

I'd be interested in seeing what portion of the code authorizes such "special prior permission."

4 posted on 01/24/2013 2:02:40 PM PST by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I understand she called David Gregory first to see if she could display them.


5 posted on 01/24/2013 2:04:16 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

This was driven up to the DC line, from Maryland, and the DC cops escorted the guns all the way up to the capital building.

Now this said...I believe that this opens up a front where some Senator may ask for a daily display of guns in his office, with the DC cops now forced to cooperate, and the Master of Arms has to go along with this. You can imagine this horse-and-pony show...daily...with guns brought in from some site in Virginia to a Senator’s office.


6 posted on 01/24/2013 2:04:31 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

So the key is the person controlling the weapons, not the weapons themselves. Isn’t that the exact opposite of the point the liberals want to make?


7 posted on 01/24/2013 2:07:44 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah
It has been reported that she got special prior permission from the DC police beforehand. Some people are more equal than others.

She also has HER OWN unrestricted Concealed Carry permit. The hypocrite.

8 posted on 01/24/2013 2:12:02 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Prosecute.


9 posted on 01/24/2013 2:17:28 PM PST by exnavy (Fish or cut bait ...Got ammo, Godspeed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

“Laws for thee, but not for me.” The liberal motto.


10 posted on 01/24/2013 2:19:13 PM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I am seriously asking my Senator to call a press conference, so he can show off a few guns.

Maybe he can demonstrate a functions check, or show us how to add accessories.

I assume the DC police will give him the same special treatment, for his press conference.


11 posted on 01/24/2013 2:34:39 PM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
I'd be interested in seeing what portion of the code authorizes such "special prior permission."

We're not allowed to ask those questions of Her Lordship.

12 posted on 01/24/2013 3:35:21 PM PST by Hardastarboard (The Liberal ruling class hates me. The feeling is mutual.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Liberal elites are above the law. The law is for the little people... don’t you know that?


13 posted on 01/24/2013 4:30:04 PM PST by GOPJ ( Do murder laws control murders?..freeper Red Badger Let's try Criminal control - Fr:MadMax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Laws don’t apply to the ruling class, just us peasants.


14 posted on 01/24/2013 4:40:10 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (There is no requirement to show need in order to exercise your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Is there a law that allows the police to ignore other laws when they want?


15 posted on 01/24/2013 5:04:54 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (There is no requirement to show need in order to exercise your rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson