Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jewbacca
You can, but why would you do that?

You can expend ENORMOUS amounts of resources on cascaded gas centrifuges to separate the U235 from U238, or ENORMOUS amounts of resources in research, engineering, and precision machining a P239 implosion device. Why do both?

20 posted on 01/23/2013 7:05:03 PM PST by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Lexinom

U235 is much easier to produce than plutonium.

There is a reason that China’s first bomb, South America’s bomb, India’s bomb, and Pakistan’s bomb were EU.

The primary benefit of a P239 bomb is they can be much smaller and boosted with fusion. If you goal is to blow up a city, you don’t need tactical weapons, just strategic.

Hence, why counties that have need for tactical nukes (e.g., US, Israel (shh!), England, and Russia) are the P239 business.

The arabs just want to nuke whole cities.


24 posted on 01/24/2013 7:51:29 AM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson