Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I am not someone who thinks the government should be involved in health care to a large degree....Obamacare is a DISASTER.

BUT this is a good lesson for those homosexuals who think Obama is "pro-freedom". When the government gets to dictate how patients are treated, the incentive for researchers in the medical field is diminished....because the motivations for creating new treatments is removed when profits are limited.

Not to mention the high COSTS involved in medical research.

No matter WHAT the affliction: AIDS, cancer, athlete's foot...the best solution is not government mandates for treatment. A MARKET that addresses the needs is better.

1 posted on 01/16/2013 3:01:48 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper

Bath House Barry throws his own fellow “bathers” under the pill bus.....

Tyrants always turn on their own on their way to the top of the heap of bodies they leave in their wake....


2 posted on 01/16/2013 3:22:03 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper; All
You're a kneejerk moron.

Patents expire, generics of all drugs eventually come in to play.

The only "RISK" here is because the generics will require three doses per day instead of one per day of the most current branded version which is still covered by patents. The "RISK" is only if the patient fails to take the medication as directed. That's not Obama's fault.

The money due the company for R&D has already been made under a patent system that has expanded terms since our Founding, from 14 years to typical 20 for drugs.

Get over it!

3 posted on 01/16/2013 3:56:58 AM PST by newzjunkey (bah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
Some generic drugs are just as good as the name brand itself. Others are closer to placebos than an actual treatment. I don't know how this factors in with HIV but I would fear for the life of anyone I knew who had to make that switch.

Will these drugs work or will the patient gradually experience a "deteriorating condition" and be taken by some other illness along the way so that the reason can't be traced back to inferior generic drugs?

This is the possibility that those in the afflicted community now face.

The savings to the government is not the switch to generics, it's the reduction of patients.

4 posted on 01/16/2013 4:06:08 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper

Anyone with a chronic disease requiring expensive medication better start preparing their will. ObamaCare can’t afford this “investment” in those costing more than they are worth. It’s the utilitarian side of Marxism.


10 posted on 01/16/2013 5:47:27 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson