Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Letís change the terminology in defending our gun rights
Gun Owners of America ^ | 08 January 2013 | Tim Macy

Posted on 01/10/2013 9:38:32 PM PST by neverdem

With the current attack on personal gun ownership and the Second Amendment, the radical Left has twisted the phrase “assault weapon” to try and take guns away from law-abiding Americans.

Real assault rifles are used by modern infantrymen and are capable of firing in a fully-automatic mode. Yes, they are currently available to citizens -- but one must submit to a federal background check (which can take months), be photographed and fingerprinted, pay a tax of $200, and get a sign-off from the local chief of police or sheriff. Moreover, because of their limited supply, machineguns run in the thousands of dollars to purchase.

The semi-automatic “assault weapons” are NOT machineguns. They don’t fire like machineguns, and they are functionally no different than many pistols or shotguns which have been available to civilian markets for over a century and which can fire in a semi-automatic mode. So, why the fuss over simple cosmetics when it doesn’t matter one whit to the internal function of the rifle?

This is why Americans must begin changing the terminology we use to our favor. So-called "assault weapons" are not designed to assault anyone -- they are "defense weapons" for Americans to defend our families, our country and our Constitution. In colonial times, the “defense weapon” of the day was a musket, and our forefathers used muskets and canons to fight the British to secure our freedom.

Today, the modern analog of the colonial musket is the AR-15 style rifles that have the ability to use standard-capacity magazines for self-defense. God forbid we have to use our “defense weapons.” But, as the old saying goes, “better to have it, and not need it, than to need it and not have it.”

Victims of tyranny -- from the Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto, to the victims of Joseph Stalin and Idi Amin -- have all wished they were armed. We should not join their ranks of victimhood.

Why would Americans give up the right to have the best possible defense weapon we can have to protect our home, family, state and nation from criminals of ALL kinds?

So, when anyone tries to turn the conversation toward "assault weapons," turn it back to "defense weapons" and, as the line goes, “stick to your guns.”

Tim Macy is the Vice Chairman of Gun Owners of America, a national gun lobby with over 300,000 members.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; defenseweapons; goa; guncontrol; secondamendment; youwillnotdisarmus

1 posted on 01/10/2013 9:38:44 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If it’s the GUNS that are so dangerous, then it is only logical that NO ONE have any guns.


2 posted on 01/10/2013 9:43:51 PM PST by UCANSEE2 ( If you think I'm crazy, just wait until you talk to my invisible friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
WRONG!

The Swiss have got it CORRECT !
We need to learn from the Swiss and implement their policies here in the United States right now, today!
The Swiss have got it CORRECT !
Remember: Read Second Amendment: It’s Not About Hunting, IT'S ABOUT TYRANNY .
3 posted on 01/10/2013 9:52:42 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Most excellent post, sehr gut!


4 posted on 01/10/2013 10:02:01 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Ran into this shocking data.....

SSRI Stories

5 posted on 01/10/2013 10:11:09 PM PST by Scooter100 ("Now that the fog has lifted, I still can't find my pipe". --- S. Holmes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Bump


6 posted on 01/10/2013 10:18:44 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
As long as we're changing terminology, let's also put to rest the nonsense BiteMe is pushing by saying: "...if it saves a single life..."

It needs to be made clear that guns in the hands of citizens is actually saving many, many more lives than the theoretical few they allege might be saved by removing those guns. It needs to be endlessly repeated that the Second Amendment saves lives, gun confiscation destroys lives.

Saw a statistic a few years ago claiming that 512 rapes were thwarted daily by the use of guns; not sure of its accuracy. If anyone knows about this, please help out. At any rate, if the numbers hold up, we need to also ask the gun grabbers, why do you want hundreds of women raped today?

7 posted on 01/10/2013 10:25:07 PM PST by stormhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Yosemitest

bookmarked for Yosemitest’s informative post. Thank you both!


8 posted on 01/10/2013 10:25:24 PM PST by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They want to ban guns.

And they’re going to do it.

Doesn’t matter what you say to them.

Or what your arguments are.

They want to ban guns.

And they think they are in a position to do it.


9 posted on 01/10/2013 10:25:50 PM PST by Tzimisce (The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I am expecting states like Texas will adopt this very same pattern, as long as they are legally Texans.


10 posted on 01/10/2013 10:28:52 PM PST by Eye of Unk (AR2 2013 is the American Revolution part 2 of 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KGeorge
You're welcome.
The time is coming when we must use the ammo we've been storing.
11 posted on 01/10/2013 10:33:59 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Bookmarked. Thank you again. (quite a savings there from my local)


12 posted on 01/10/2013 10:55:53 PM PST by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KGeorge
My pleasure, and may I recommend an excellent home defense weapon, the PTR-91, a short barreled rifle requiring a $200.00 federal tax.?
13 posted on 01/10/2013 11:21:26 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

I wish! It’s sad to be po’. God Willing, it won’t be deadly. (A short barrel would be such a luxury. I am dangerous to myself & others anytime I pick up something more than 2 feet long- & it ain’t the bullets. I <3 handguns)


14 posted on 01/10/2013 11:38:51 PM PST by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KGeorge

should have clarified- all somethings; vacuum wand, trim molding, broom. I handle a long gun like it’s a nuclear weapon (terrified of it)
Sorry for the double post.


15 posted on 01/10/2013 11:41:03 PM PST by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Could buy a Barret 50 Cal Sniper Rifle they are rather expensive and hard to conceal!!


16 posted on 01/10/2013 11:42:09 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KGeorge
It's better to be alive and po' with an excellent home defense weapon, than po' and bleeding to death.
Practice takes away danger.
We fight like we play.
17 posted on 01/10/2013 11:50:31 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Great post! Bookmarked. I knew a little about Swiss gun ownership and military service but that thorough rendition is excellent.


18 posted on 01/10/2013 11:52:48 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Pass along the info to your friends and shut down the liberals with this recommendation.


19 posted on 01/10/2013 11:55:20 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: IncPen; BartMan1

ping


20 posted on 01/10/2013 11:59:56 PM PST by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

So true. Lack of practice is a problem for me, for sure. I envy those who are in a location & can afford to play. Besides the fun they have now, they are the ones who will be ready to fight from the get-go.


21 posted on 01/11/2013 12:07:33 AM PST by KGeorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KGeorge
I don't know what part of Texas you're in, but any drive out to the country and a short conversation with a land owner who has a deep ditch, or a hill side should provide you a place to practice for free.
Just explain your problem, and be polite.
22 posted on 01/11/2013 12:12:44 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they TRY to take it.


I figure that will be in about 4 weeks.


23 posted on 01/11/2013 2:20:20 AM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

I may agree with some policies in your post. But mandatory military service, no. That is involuntary servitude and deleterious to my rights.


24 posted on 01/11/2013 3:03:15 AM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Canned heat, Out of Stock:

http://georgia-arms.com/cannedheat223remington55grfullmetaljacket500pk.aspx

I searched yesterday for .223 rounds. Found two places with them, Black Hills Varmint Grenades and the Zombie rounds. They’re probably sold out today.


25 posted on 01/11/2013 3:48:53 AM PST by gotribe (obama = the Great Divider)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The only terminology needed is the wording of the second ammendment. It was written in plain language with specific words placed in specific order to make a simple plain message.

Make the left admit that they are trying to destroy the constitution.


26 posted on 01/11/2013 4:26:38 AM PST by Texas resident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

REAL Assault Rifles vs Gun Grabber Myths


WHY does anyone NEED an ASSAULT RIFLE?


HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINE BAN for WHAT?


27 posted on 01/11/2013 4:27:40 AM PST by EdReform (Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
If it’s the GUNS that are so dangerous, then it is only logical that NO ONE have any guns.

if the definition of a criminal is one who violates the law, and since the basis of our laws is our constitution, what does that make the one who violates the constitution? I'll answer that. It makes him a criminal. Since criminals are prohibited from having or using weapons, then it is only logical that we remove the ability for them to have or use weapons. And their weapons include the jack booted thugs who raid the homes of those who have not been proven to be guilty of any crimes.

28 posted on 01/11/2013 4:45:49 AM PST by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Someone needs to make a serious “Reporters/Editors Guide to Guns” as a single sheet with drawings and diagrams restating the same thing we’ve been saying for decades.

On top of that post something to YouTube with the same name. Let it go viral and you’ve killed the ideas they’re basing their attacks on.

It’s that easy and JPFO, GOA or the NRA, SAS, etc. could do it easily. Plus, their spokepersons need to refuse to accept the lie when interviewed. Explain it over and over again.


29 posted on 01/11/2013 5:54:36 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

It is NOT an “Assault Weapon”, it is a semi auto firearm.
It is NOT “Gun Control”. It is disarming civilians.

Lets not use their terms and thus not let them set the terms of the discussion.

We can take away their presumption, their false assumptions, and their implied lies by not accepting their terms.


30 posted on 01/11/2013 9:10:40 AM PST by Wildbill22 (They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton Williams Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gotribe
Try 1000 Rounds of .223 Ammo by Federal American Eagle - 55gr FMJ $769.90.
31 posted on 01/11/2013 9:47:02 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

It might wake up some liberals, and frag some homosexuals.


32 posted on 01/11/2013 9:49:39 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson