Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: chris37
I don't see it that way.

Clarkson wants to have a successful career in Hollywood and it's a liability to be a conservative, social Republican.

She sold out her principles in order to make it in Hollyweird.

29 posted on 01/10/2013 6:57:46 AM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: LdSentinal

In this country, it’s a liability to be any kind of republican.

Whatever reasons factor in to her individual decision, she allied with the strong majority and not the weak minority.

The people she intends to sell music to are not conservative. Maybe a few of them are, but they are of no consequence. If she were to ally with say, Mitt Romney, she would be boycotted.

The left is dominant, the right is submissive.

It will remain that way until we change it.

If I was an entertainer, public figure who makes money from popularity, would I rather be seen as a friend of Obama or a friend of Lindsay Graham?

How about John McCain?

John Boehaner?

Mitch McConnel?

Here’s a tough one. Does the entertainer want to be seen with Obama or Sarah Palin?

39 posted on 01/10/2013 7:09:19 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson