Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Getting Rid of the 2nd Amendment
US Government | 2013/01/09 | US Government

Posted on 01/09/2013 12:30:05 PM PST by BillM

Article V of the Constitution spells out the processes by which amendments can be proposed and ratified.

To Propose Amendments •In the U.S. Congress, both the House of Representatives and the Senate approve by a two-thirds supermajority vote, a joint resolution amending the Constitution. Amendments so approved do not require the signature of the President of the United States and are sent directly to the states for ratification. •Two-thirds of the state legislatures ask Congress to call a national convention to propose amendments. (This method has never been used.)

To Ratify Amendments •Three-fourths of the state legislatures approve it, or •Ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states approve it. This method has been used only once -- to ratify the 21st Amendment -- repealing Prohibition.

The Supreme Court has stated that ratification must be within "some reasonable time after the proposal." Beginning with the 18th amendment, it has been customary for Congress to set a definite period for ratification. In the case of the 18th, 20th, 21st, and 22nd amendments, the period set was 7 years, but there has been no determination as to just how long a "reasonable time" might extend.

Of the thousands of proposals that have been made to amend the Constitution, only 33 obtained the necessary two-thirds vote in Congress. Of those 33, only 27 amendments (including the Bill of Rights) have been ratified.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amendments; banglist; constitution; guncontrol; secondamendment; vanity; youwillnotdisarmus
TELL THEM THIS IS THE ONLY WAY
1 posted on 01/09/2013 12:30:12 PM PST by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BillM
The first 10 amendments, the Bill Of Rights, are unalienable.
2 posted on 01/09/2013 12:35:55 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillM

My understanding is that the Bill of Rights was an integral part of the Constitution. Also that the Constitution itself would not be ratified without a Bill of Rights.

In other words the first 10 amendments could not be amended even if the rest of the Constitution could be changed since the Constitution itself depended on the Bill of Rights for it’s existence.


3 posted on 01/09/2013 12:37:25 PM PST by yarddog (One shot one miss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillM

Tagline...


4 posted on 01/09/2013 12:38:36 PM PST by TSgt (Infringe upon my 2nd Amendment rights and learn how to speed read at 3000 feet per second...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillM

Most of us take the phrase “shall not be abridged” to mean the right to keep and bear arms can’t be amended.

Obama and the dems seem to think if they can goad the populace into acting against them, the military will back them up in crushing any resistance. It will be a surprise when the military tells them that their allegiance is to the Constitution, and not to some would be commusist dictatorship.


5 posted on 01/09/2013 12:39:05 PM PST by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BillM

Boner could bring to a vote the repeal of the 2nd Amendment.

Then all Republicans and most Democrats could vote against it.

Don’t bring any other bills up for a vote.


6 posted on 01/09/2013 12:41:27 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (The shooter in CT was a Satanist. Curtail Satanists' First Amendment Rights for the Children!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

This is implied in the Pre-amble to the BoR, but an Amendment can over-ride another Amendment. See Prohibition.


7 posted on 01/09/2013 12:43:09 PM PST by Dead Corpse (Sine ullo desiderio vive et ama.... Carpe diem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BillM

The 2nd Amendment isn’t going anywhere. There will be some regulation (like background checks) but that’s going to be about it. I’ve been an NRA member for decades.

Everyone relax.


8 posted on 01/09/2013 12:56:03 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everyone



Support FR and the Father of Our Country!

9 posted on 01/09/2013 1:01:32 PM PST by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
The Second Amendment may not be going anywhere, but there is a whole host of horrors that Obama could try to gut its meaning. He could require licensing and an annual fee for all semi auto weapons. He could prohibit possession of all long guns and pistols with high capacity magazines. He could require that insurance rates be greatly increased for any individual or household with firearms. He could, you get the idea. Each of these moves would have to be litigated, if Congress o the people don't stop him.
10 posted on 01/09/2013 1:07:59 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Bogus quote


11 posted on 01/09/2013 1:13:18 PM PST by frogjerk (Obama Claus is coming to town!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BillM

None of this matters, the King will do as he pleases! Get ready to turn in our guns & board the busses!


12 posted on 01/09/2013 2:00:50 PM PST by blondee123 (DICTATORSHIP HAS ARRIVED! Nov. 6, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog; All
In other words the first 10 amendments could not be amended even if the rest of the Constitution could be changed since the Constitution itself depended on the Bill of Rights for it’s existence.

Although concerned delegates to the Con-Con were assured that a bill of rights would be drafted, the articles of the Constitution were ratified before the BoR was drafted and ratified. That's why BoR is regarded as amendments to the Constitution.

Also note that James Madison, regarded as the father of both the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, was actually not supportive of a bill of rights. I understand that Madison expressed concern that, since the states never delegated to Congress the specific power to regulate our basic freedoms, that a bill of rights was unnecessary, arguably redundant.

In fact, Alexander Hamilton had essentially argued that every word amended to the Constituiton would just give unscrupuoulous lawyers another foothold to destroy the Constitution. In fact, we are now slaves to perversions of the BoR by activist justices.

13 posted on 01/09/2013 2:32:08 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blondee123

No, get ready to lock & load, then shoot out the tires on the buses. That’s for starters.

They don’t own us, either the politicians or the ‘roid rangers sent to do their will.


14 posted on 01/09/2013 2:33:27 PM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BillM
Photobucket
15 posted on 01/09/2013 2:39:54 PM PST by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo
“Everyone relax.”

If 0bama can appoint another moonbat Justice to the Supreme Court to replace one of the “conservative” Justice's, the 2nd amendment would be in extreme danger!

16 posted on 01/09/2013 3:50:39 PM PST by HenpeckedCon (What pi$$es me off the most is that POS commie will get a State Funeral!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson