Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden: Obama Considering 'Executive Order' to Deal With Guns
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/biden-obama-might-use-executive-order-deal-guns_694984.html ^

Posted on 01/09/2013 9:51:19 AM PST by kcvl

Biden: Obama Considering 'Executive Order' to Deal With Guns

"The president is going to act," said Biden, giving some comments to the press before a meeting with victims of gun violence. "There are executives orders, there's executive action that can be taken. We haven't decided what that is yet. But we're compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action that we believe is required."

Biden said that this is a moral issue and that "it's critically important that we act."

Biden talked also about taking responsible action. "As the president said, if you're actions result in only saving one life, they're worth taking. But I'm convinced we can affect the well-being of millions of Americans and take thousands of people out of harm's way if we act responsibly."

Biden, as he himself noted, helped write the Brady bill.

Eric Holder was scheduled to be at the meeting that's currently taking place at the White House.

(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; banglist; bho44; bhobanglist; bhoeo; bhofascism; bloodoftyrants; civilwar2; constitution; democrats; dictatorship; executivefiat; guncontrol; notbreakingnews; obama; obamalegacy; obamunism; rapeofliberty; secondamendment; sourcetitlenoturl; treason; tyranny; veepbiden; wewillnotcomply; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 next last
To: Red Steel
I heard Walmart refused to meet with Plugs Biden. Good for Walmart.

I probably got myself on some watch list, but I had to do it. I heard on ABC radio that Biden was going to meet with video game makers in a few days, because they want to take a "broad approach" to the gun problem. I called the White House comment line and said that the day I see Quentin Tarantino and other filth-purveying Hollywood punks who donated to the President's campaign called up to the White House to have Biden chew them out is the day I will see this as anything but another dog and pony show meant to insult my intelligence and screw with my liberties.

161 posted on 01/09/2013 12:31:03 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Don't worry about the cliff. We're going to all land on some rich guy's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: sand88

Lon seems to have disappeared.


162 posted on 01/09/2013 12:37:43 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

LOL


163 posted on 01/09/2013 12:37:56 PM PST by QualityMan (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
This would be equivalent to FDR threatening to 'stack the Supreme Court', it would make Obama a lame duck the moment he attempts to circumvent the Constitution.

Even Democrats from Red States would be forced to oppose him.

164 posted on 01/09/2013 12:38:34 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44

Nothing that violates the Constitution is legal. Some may call it legal (like the SCOTUS calling Obamacare legal) but it’s not, anymore than it would be legal for him to say, “Murder is now legal in a ten mile radius around the following coordinates” or something like that.


165 posted on 01/09/2013 12:48:47 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Don't worry about the cliff. We're going to all land on some rich guy's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1
What? Are on drugs? What did I write that has JACK to do with the JEWS...

Nope, not on drugs. Its a simple and direct analogy. You stated that you "liked to think" that everything would be OK, as a dismissal of my answer to your question (which was the the only Constitutional mechanism for removing an out of control government is the 2A).

You had a chance (as we all did) to further our "likes" back in November. Assuming you didn't vote for Obama, you are not not getting what you would have "liked". If you did vote for Obama, you're statements are moronic and you are likely on drugs.

How did the German Jews react to an ever more hostile government. Most all of them continued wishful thinking that the law would be upheld of them and all would work out OK. You can take your pick from any number of peoples, professions, etc. that have been trampled under statism.

If you can't learn a lesson from such historical occurances, then you are doomed to experience them.

166 posted on 01/09/2013 12:51:31 PM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Perhaps a symbolic protest is needed. Such as when greenies turn off all their lights at an appointed time. Except this time, if Obama makes a move and patriots announce an appointed time, the air will be filled with the sounds of millions of guns being fired. Even if cities have gunshot detection equipment, that will be overwhelmed by thousands of simultaneous gunshots. I think such an action will let them know we are ready to act.


167 posted on 01/09/2013 1:02:02 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider

No, no, no.

No matter what anyone says about Lincoln, rightly or wrongly, it was DEMOCRATS confiscating federal property and firing on a federal military reservation that began the war.

With all due respect to Southerners who fought bravely for what they thought was right, it should never be forgotten that Democrats who supported slavery fired the first shots then and are in essence firing the first shots now.


168 posted on 01/09/2013 1:03:46 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Don't worry about the cliff. We're going to all land on some rich guy's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

169 posted on 01/09/2013 1:27:33 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Now that’s what I call using the power of media to stand up for The People. Drudge just might get back on my good side if he keeps this up.


170 posted on 01/09/2013 1:30:31 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
I was listening to the Art Bell show a few months ago...

Do you mean Coast to Coast AM? Art's been off the air for years and years.

171 posted on 01/09/2013 1:32:41 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Yes!


172 posted on 01/09/2013 1:39:02 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1

“Can we recall/remove the President and Vice president for failure to uphold the Constitution? I bet if there was a way to have a vote on it they would be history. I can dream can’t I?”

There is nothing to prevent the House from impeaching the President. In fact, the Constitution requires it if they adher to their oath to uphold it.

No problem there.

The problem is the removal which involves getting the Senate to act, which is not remotely possible.

I for one believe that the Republicans in the House have a very strong hand in the threat to impeach Obama. It certainly neutered Clinton when they did it.


173 posted on 01/09/2013 1:50:00 PM PST by bestintxas (Anyone who votes for Obama after these 4 miserable years needs to take a mandatory citizenship test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

If Obama DOES issue such an order, the House better start impeachment proceedings ten minutes after he issues it.


174 posted on 01/09/2013 1:58:57 PM PST by Little Ray (Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Looks like it’s TIME.


175 posted on 01/09/2013 2:14:59 PM PST by Quickgun (I came here screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Has anyone (in the modern era) tried to organize an armed demonstration of both our first amendment right to peaceably assemble and our second amendment right to bear arms? What would it be like if 100,000 (or more) armed citizens gathered in VA and marched across the bridges into DC to protest the intrusions on our rights, including a protest on the intrusion into our right to form a militia against a tyrannical government?
176 posted on 01/09/2013 2:31:45 PM PST by Alright2BRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DonkeyBonker

Some will, mostly those looking for some kind of political position. By a large margin, the military is OUR sons and daughters. I have already spoke with some about how they felt about a coming civil war,and what their friends opinions were. I was pretty satisfied with the feedback,to say the least...


177 posted on 01/09/2013 2:41:53 PM PST by Quickgun (I came here screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

I think barry should just relax and take in a play.


178 posted on 01/09/2013 3:12:11 PM PST by crosshairs (They are only assault weapons in the hands of tyrannical governments and criminals. Ban both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MomwithHope
Who is going to fight back in Washington? Bend Over Boehner?? or maybe Milktoast McDonnell?

Email Congressman Peter King (R-NY). I think he has some fight.
179 posted on 01/09/2013 3:13:27 PM PST by crosshairs (They are only assault weapons in the hands of tyrannical governments and criminals. Ban both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: warsaw44
Does anyone know if an American President can legally issue an executive order that violates the constitution?

Seriously. You have to even ask?
180 posted on 01/09/2013 3:24:30 PM PST by crosshairs (They are only assault weapons in the hands of tyrannical governments and criminals. Ban both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson