Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Voters Hate Senate 'Cliff' Deal(Yes, and we will hate those who voted it into law as well)
brietbart ^ | 1/8/13 | m flynn

Posted on 01/08/2013 12:40:22 PM PST by bestintxas

On Friday, Gallup released a poll gauging Americans' views of the Senate deal passed last week to avert the "fiscal cliff." Overall, Americans are mixed on the deal, with 45% disapproving and 43% approving. Among Republican voters, though, the verdict is overwhelmingly negative. 65% of Republican voters disapprove of the plan, against just 27% who support it. It's the opening salvo in the 2014 primaries. The Senate deal, negotiated by GOP Leader McConnell and VP Biden, gave the government $620 Billion in new tax revenue and delayed, for two months, the automatic spending cuts enacted with the debt ceiling increase in 2011. The deal passed the House narrowly, due to strong support from Democrats. House Republicans voted 2-1 against the measure. Their opposition mirrors, almost perfectly, the reaction of the party base.

The deal agreed to last week is just the opening act in a drama set to play out over the coming weeks. Next up is a fight to increase the debt ceiling and debate over next year's budget, or continuing resolution. The Republicans secured no real spending cuts in the "cliff" deal. If they again fail to win any real spending cuts in the coming rounds, the mood of the GOP electorate will sour even more.

The political futures of many GOP members may be decided by March.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cliff
Gee, is it

1) It was passed in middle of night 2) It was passed without anyone reading it 3) It was passed with a majority of the party in power against it 4) It prostituted all principles of conservatism in raising taxes on the majority of Americans 5) It was passed as a tax-heavy "compromise" with thinly-veiled spending reductions 6) The spending reductions were actually spending increases 7) It had higher spending than what both Pelosi and Reid originally wanted 8) All of the above

1 posted on 01/08/2013 12:40:31 PM PST by bestintxas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

I’m glad my congressman was one of the 3 from Michigan who voted no.


2 posted on 01/08/2013 12:42:26 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

I pity the Rino Monkeys who voted for it!
Send them packing.


3 posted on 01/08/2013 12:51:52 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“I’m glad my congressman was one of the 3 from Michigan who voted no.”

Mine (Culberson) also voted no but my two Senators voted yes.

One is history already(Hutchison) but I already placed on notice the other(Cornyn)as being one that will be eyed for replacement the next time he comes up.

To my new Senator Ted Cruz: go for the jugular!


4 posted on 01/08/2013 1:13:24 PM PST by bestintxas (Anyone who votes for Obama after these 4 miserable years needs to take a mandatory citizenship test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas
RE :”65% of Republican voters disapprove of the plan”

Is this higher than any other bill that O signed into law since taking office?

I dont imagine the result of the debt limit and budget spending bills that he signs will poll any better.

5 posted on 01/08/2013 1:15:30 PM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to O is NO principle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas

My 2 US Senators(Grassley and HARKIN) voted NO, My Congressman(Then) STEVE KING and (NOW)Tom Lathum(re-disticting) also voted NO!


6 posted on 01/08/2013 1:16:37 PM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bestintxas
Some say there are no differences between the parties but there are. For example:

Basically democrats fight and republicans roll over. The GOP is built to be loyal opposition party, a permanent minority that cannot and will not lead. They despise the base because their main goal is to get the trappings of power and status as a social elite and the base keeps embarrassing them with their "crazy" demands like low taxation, second amendment rights, enforcement of the laws, and freedom of religion. You know, things the NY Times will say they are hicks for supporting.

Obama is able to win because he knows that the GOP may make some weak gestures of protest about high taxes, massive debt, crushing regulation, and oppression of freedom but deep down these things don't really bother them. It's just a show for the base and if he gives them a way to abandon opposition to those things, they will every time. All he needs to do is create a crisis so they can say "what else could I do?" and everyone in DC is happy.

7 posted on 01/08/2013 2:08:08 PM PST by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

“All he needs to do is create a crisis so they can say “what else could I do?” and everyone in DC is happy.”

Damn right!

I think this comparison between a republican and a democrat is very realistic:

“Don’t let a crisis go to waste” Rahm Emannuel

“use a crisis to cave and hang your hat on” Most Republicans


8 posted on 01/08/2013 2:19:35 PM PST by melancholy (Professor Alinsky, Enslavement Specialist, Ph.D. in L0w and H0lder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson