Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security deduction for 1st check of 2013 (Vanity)

Posted on 01/08/2013 10:20:40 AM PST by crosshairs

I was wondering why my paycheck was so much less for the first check of the new year and started looking at the deductions and saw that the amount taken out for Social Security tax went up 50%. WTH! I guess we have to fund all the lazy bastards who have gone on SSDI in the last year.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 01/08/2013 10:20:44 AM PST by crosshairs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: crosshairs

They ended the “payroll tax holiday”, which was a stupid political gimmick that damaged the solvency of Social Security quite a bit. So that increase is OK...it’s income tax in general that remains way too high.


2 posted on 01/08/2013 10:23:18 AM PST by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs

Don’t worry. They’re keeping it in your account for you.


3 posted on 01/08/2013 10:25:16 AM PST by Rio (Tempis Fugit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs

The so called “payroll tax holiday” (4.2% your portion) expired.

The current rate (6.2% your portion) is what it was before.

The employer’s portions was never part of the “holiday”.


4 posted on 01/08/2013 10:27:34 AM PST by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs
Of course Romney detailed this during the debates. Low Information Voters should be the only people truly surprised.

I just love that phrase Low Information Voters.

5 posted on 01/08/2013 10:28:05 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

For wage earners, it went BACK up to 6.2% from the 2% less ‘holiday’ Obama gave his voters (he wanted only to give it to THE BARRACK, but had to do it for every wage earner)....that is back up to 6.2% now, double for self-employed people (usually not THE BARACK).

Technically not a tax but an insurance contribution and thus an ‘off-the-top’ deduction from every paycheck. For most of THE BARACK is is the only Federal deduction from their paychecks because they mostly don’t pay any Federal INCOME tax at all. Barack and the Media and even some RINO fools call it “payroll taxes” because they think it gives THE BARACK in this country the idea they really pay their fair share of actual ‘taxes.’ They actually largely get more money than they paid in on Federal Income Taxes because of that whopping big ass EITC check they get every year.


6 posted on 01/08/2013 10:29:32 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rio
"Don’t worry. They’re keeping it in your account for you."

Seriously laughing out loud in my office right now.

7 posted on 01/08/2013 10:30:51 AM PST by Mich Patriot (PITCH BLACK is the new "transparent")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs

Where have you been?

The temporary tax holiday expired. Not to be snarky, but everybody not living under a rock should have been aware of that.


8 posted on 01/08/2013 10:31:26 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (2 Corinthians 4:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs

Yep the Payroll Tax Holiday of 2011 & 2012 ended at midnight on Dec. 31, 2012. Your rate went back up to the normal rate of 6.2% from the tax holiday rate of 4.2%.


9 posted on 01/08/2013 10:32:20 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie
"I just love that phrase Low Information Voters."

I joust quite a bit with liberals on other discussion boards. Many of them are very well informed, but I consider them to be "Low comprehension voters".

10 posted on 01/08/2013 10:32:31 AM PST by Baynative (Those that work for a living are now outnumbered by those that vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs

Someone has to pay for my $18.00/month increase!

After all, the Trust Fund has already been raided.


11 posted on 01/08/2013 10:34:57 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

I see. They stick a Q-Tip in one ear and it comes out the other side.


12 posted on 01/08/2013 10:35:53 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs

But, but we wuz promised the SS system was fully funded and needed not increases back in 1964!

Here is what they said from the SS web site.

http://www.ssa.gov/history/ssa/usa1964-2.html

Self-Supporting

“The program is designed so that contributions plus interest on the investments of the social security trust funds will be sufficient to meet all of the costs of benefits and administration, now and into the indefinite future—without any subsidy from the general funds of the Government.

Both the Congress and the Executive Branch, regardless of political party in power, have scrupulously provided in advance for full financing of all liberalizations in the program.”

And here is where your money went! READ AND WEEP!

http://www.socialsecurity.gov/OACT/ProgData/fundFAQ.html#n4


13 posted on 01/08/2013 10:38:32 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (GUNS.. the rightful property of freemen, and formidable only to tyrannical governments.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

“I just love that phrase Low Information Voters.” I like F*CKIN Idiots and Leeches better.


14 posted on 01/08/2013 10:38:49 AM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Barack and the Media and even some RINO fools call it “payroll taxes”

Ha! No kidding. In the age of calling many things "investments" that are not, shouldn't this "tax" actually be called an investment? Even though nothing is really invested, just IOUs written for your future retirement.....
15 posted on 01/08/2013 10:39:52 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

The new rate was applied to my last check (issued in 2013) which was for the last 2 weeks of 2012... is that right?? Just wondering.


16 posted on 01/08/2013 10:41:44 AM PST by CygnusXI (Im back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CygnusXI

That doesn’t sound right. It should not have kicked in until the first of this year (2013).


17 posted on 01/08/2013 10:44:39 AM PST by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

They should change welfare, unemployment and food stamps to the LIVE Act. (low information voter entitlement) Act.


18 posted on 01/08/2013 10:51:41 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Want freedom? Think WWRRD? Then do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CygnusXI

Yep mine(and my wife’s too).


19 posted on 01/08/2013 10:52:20 AM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mich Patriot
"Don’t worry. They’re keeping it in your account for you."

Bwah-hahahahahah!!! My laff-of-the day so far!

20 posted on 01/08/2013 10:58:01 AM PST by DJ Frisat ((optional, printed after my name on post))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson