Posted on 01/01/2013 11:46:53 AM PST by T.O.K.
Edited on 01/01/2013 12:54:57 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Those that serve the country have sworn an oath to God to protect and defend the Constitution.
“Someone mentioned that the majority of us don’t want to be the first to martyr for the cause. But what happens when it’s our friends, family, neighbors?”
That will only be answered by each individual at the point of no return. In DC, Detroit, Chicago...etc... you will be outnumbered 10-1. In Montana they will be outnumbered 100-1.
The protection has to come from our state leaders. The feds are on a roll and must be reigned in.
Is there any ruling on the natural born status of a child where one of the parents is not a citizen of the U.S.?
Is there any ruling on the natural born status of a child where one of the parents is not a citizen of the U.S.?
“Man” is generally acknowledged to refer to both men and women when a person is speaking generally.
I understand that many people who did not grow up many decades ago may not be as sensitive to certain forms of expression as those of us who experienced sexual harassment in our youth. And some people may not be aware that their parents inculcated a subtle inclination to resent women more intensely than they resent men who have power over them and to denigrate such women more vociferously than they would a man.
I understand that many people who did not grow up many decades ago may not be as sensitive to certain forms of expression as those of us who experienced sexual harassment in our youth.
Such as this young man, who was speaking directly to Feistein, yet he's criticized for language he (I'm guessing) never realized may appear to be degrading to some.
He was speaking about and to a specific person. A woman. Not numerous people. In my example, he's speaking to a specific person (though fictional). A man. Is my example offensive to men?
I mean no disrespect and know I cannot fathom what it must be like to be a woman who has been harassed. I feel too much has been read into his letter, and the point of his letter has been hijacked by those who choose to be offended by his use of the term "woman" when they have no idea of his intent at the time he wrote the letter.
Perhaps he is a chauvinist wife beater, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt since his letter was to refute the intended legislation of Senator Feinstein.
Boxer is a mental midget. Her hissy fit was laughable...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.