Is It Time to Contact Gannett Board of Directors For Official Reaction to Invasion of Privacy to Legal Gun Permit Holders?
No, time to post their names and addresses and hold a protest in their front yard. Seriously, if just one concealed carry holder is damaged by their publication, the resulting lawsuit will end this. By the way, has anyone besides me noticed a correlation between these actions and Feinstein’s proposed gun registration? And they wonder why we oppose registration.......
No, time to post their names and addresses and hold a protest in their front yard. Seriously, if just one concealed carry holder is damaged by their publication, the resulting lawsuit will end this. By the way, has anyone besides me noticed a correlation between these actions and Feinstein’s proposed gun registration? And they wonder why we oppose registration.......
No, time to post their names and addresses and hold a protest in their front yard. Seriously, if just one concealed carry holder is damaged by their publication, the resulting lawsuit will end this. By the way, has anyone besides me noticed a correlation between these actions and Feinstein’s proposed gun registration? And they wonder why we oppose registration.......
Publishing the names and addresses (and aerial home views) of ALL the liberal media lapdogs is the perfect Alinksy tactic against the Alinskyites. In their feral adolescent minds they think anyone to the right of Barbra Streisand is armed and dangerous. So they are genuinely intimidated when they are pointed out on a map.
all the writers, editors, ect on that list have had their phones off the hook since the day it came out...some have switched numbers and just about all the facebook pages have been shut down....real brave of these cowards...
The paper has announced that it will expand its map and print even more names.
Good grief. Follow the money. Contact the advertisers. Duh.
Gannet is USA today the Army Times AF Times, nothing but a bunch of left wing nuts, don’t waste your time.
Right. Media has zero respect for 2nd amendment.
But consider a law to limits publication of classified information, war secrets, things that could get our troops killed, identity of spies in foreign countries helping us, national security secrets, photos of crime victims, private humiliating details on private citizens, etc., etc.
and these ba$tard$ scream bloody murder
I'm not really advocating it, I am just pointing out that this is where we are headed, if they keep it up.
A lot of information is actually public. Time to go into county records and pull copies of mortgage records with SSNs, drivers licenses, dates of birth and so on.
Depending on the source most of that can be obtained through public records.
Perhaps it’s time to contact people in the area NOT listed as having permits and asking them “is your house un-armed? The Gannett papers say you’re a sitting duck”;
Maybe this will produce angry phone calls to the paper FROM the un-armed citizens starting to feel the paper has MADE THEM vulnerable.
Maybe it’s time to do a spoof. That is, create a webpage with a map of “everything Muslim” in the NYC area, and attribute the webpage to The Journal News, with a disclaimer in small print on the bottom of the page.
As an extra ha-ha, include a mouse-over on the map that puts a “terrorist detainment center” in Central Park.
Gannett won’t do squat!
They started in Upstate NY, and did exactly the same thing in the Rochester, NY Democrat & Chronicle back in the 70’s. They had a five or six full page listing of every CC permit holder in the county - full names and titles plus address - around 7000 or so listings. Then, as now, the excuse was “It’s public knowledge.”
Not sure what the answer is, but this type of usage of our public records may be legal, but to my mind is unlawful.
Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.