He meant it, you use it as a fig leaf to promote RINOs.
Why do you keep posting your analysis of elections. Politically you are one of the most ignorant posters here, why would I want to read what you think about that?
I don't know, you seem to love to keep clicking on my responses and getting so incensed that you just *have* to try to insult my intelligence.
The funny part is, the remarks you make in earnest are more insulting to anyone's intelligence -- that is, that you expect your RINO cheerleading to be taken seriously -- than any of your personal remarks.
Steelman was the Tea Party candidate and Brunner the "establishment" entry. The socon's got the candidate they wanted and Akin, predictably, said something idiotic and imploded - which was exactly why the Claire and her goons wanted him to win.
Incidentally, you noted in an earlier post that Palin correctly supported Steelman in Missouri, while blaming her as a clueless dimwit loser elsewhere; then blamed the other candidates opposing Steelman, and some of their supporters, for the debacle in Missouri...and now in this post you switch around and agreed with *me*, that Akins candidacy was engineered in part by the Democrats.
I'm sorry, I can't keep a straight face any more, I've been busted.
Nothing is more fun than counter-baiting a troll.
Yes, I meant all I said, but it's been fun getting you to foam at the mouth. Your last post has been the icing on the cake.
Have a Happy New Year, RINO Troll.
Maybe if you work hard enough you can help the GOP put Kerry (who by the way served in Viet Nam, did you know that?) in as SecState, Hagel in as SecDef, and Cass Sunstein to replace Scalia on the Supreme Court. THAT'LL show those Fundie Teabaggers, won't it?
Cheers!
Oh stop it, your posts are ignorant and nonsensical almost all the time. You're not fooling anyone. Seriously, read/listen more and talk/type less, it really would be good for you and you'd probably learn a lot. People don't forget things like your Palin meltdown where you had convinced yourself she was running even when it had become obvious she wasn't. You just come off as extremely foolish when you do that and lose all credibility. Study up, learn some political history and post only when you really understand the conversation - that would be a good start for you going forward.
I tried to go backwards a half dozen posts and don't quite understand the animus.
The name calling is awesome.....
:-)