The superintendent's reply was that most of the inner-city schools have their own armed police force to protect the students and schools.
If that is so, then why is there so much opposition to arming teachers or patrols in the rural schools?
because no amount of their bullshiite is going to change reality so they resort to mocking the idea loudly and often in hopes of affecting perception and; thus, reality. It’s mind control.
The question needs to be asked, not whether to guard the schools with armed guards, but WHY AREN'T THE UNGUARDED ONES GUARDED?
From that perspective, the politicians already KNOW that some schools need to be guarded. They've just failed to guard all of them, and are using their failure against us to take our guns.
Because they don’t like the messenger. Since the suggestion came from conservatives, the inclination is for the left leaning school bureaucracies to reject outright.
If the suggestion had come from Janet N.’s DHS, it would have been hailed as a stroke of received genius from on high.