Posted on 12/22/2012 7:24:30 AM PST by Dave346
Just in case one ever wondered why Debka was so much like Pravda.
Thanks, but no thanks, Dave346.
Exactly; Russia taking the WMD is the responsible thing to do.
It’s Debka. This did not happen.
“Exactly; Russia taking the WMD is the responsible thing to do.”
I’m not so sure about that.... how many UN resolutions did they do first?
Do I need the /s?
Probably so.
The dems gave just enough time to move WMD’s to Syria and bury a bunch of them in Iraq too.
As has been noted on this thread, this get’s Obama’s panties in a great big bunch fer sure!
He wanted them to go to his handler's (Jarrett) terrorist org, the Muslim Brotherhood.
I guess it get’s Jarrett's jock strap in a bunch too...but she will still get her agenda pushed big time by her lackey Obama.
I say let them.
At least Russia knows how to deal with terrorists, and isn’t hamstrung by PC cries of racist when what needs being done needs doing.
I’d rather live under Russia than Obama
Debka.
Just saying.
I’m suprised they are still around. Aren’t they the ones who some years ago claimed China had millions of troops in Mexico ready to invade the US?
bingo
Whoda wever thought Russia would be a bastion of reason.
We traded places under Obama. Putin is noy leader of the somewhat free world.
Russia: Syria consolidates its chemical weapons
With Debka you need to decide, is it all disinfo or is there some truth there.
“Now on to the black market where Russia can sell them to the highest bidder.”
Probably stale outdated crap that would make the Russians (who also suplied them) look bad if Assad deployed them
Interesting how it was also the Russians who oversaw the transfer of those same WMD’s from Iraq to Syria during the Gulf War.
Debkafiles says it. So it must be so./sarc
The presumption is that the rebels can’t defeat the Russians.
Never underestimate the enemies capabilities.
Let Magog do it.
What would you have us do? Invade? Bomb the chemical weapons?
If Russia wants that mess, they're more than welcome to it.
So now allies can commandeer munitions on a sovereign state’s territory? Interesting sort of ‘ally’. Will the US be sending troops to “take control” of weapons of which they disapprove in Israel next? Of course, I’m being a legal purist. But it’s a disturbing precedent.
And neither should we. When Russians claim that the Syrians have all their WMD under control, you can probably bet your last nut, that they do not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.