Looks like Phys.org leaned on our friend neverdem.
· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·
Posted on 12/14/2012 6:11:59 PM PST by neverdem
Copyright 2012 Phys.org
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of Phys.org. Here's the link.
You’re a tease
It would seem that the next logical step is to split the other daughter photon and create quadruple entangled photons...
At last today, something that makes sense to me!!!
You and commander Spock (from Star Trek) must have been separated at birth. My head hurts from reading part of the article.
http://phys.org/news/2012-12-physicists-entanglement-einstein.html
Researchers discover fastest light-driven process
Team solves mystery associated with DNA repair
Treat obesity as physiology, not physics (Gary Taubes)
FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.
That's what I'm waiting for!
Over an hour spent reading this and other links and no closer to a Nobel Prize.
This is about as confusing as when my dynamics professor wrote on the blackboard that “Every couple has it’s moment”.
This experiment and all its kin are “Parlor Trick Physics”, not that there’s anything wrong with that, but all the same mind-bogglediness is present in the routine explanations of atomic structure and solid state quantum physics. Just sit and stare at a piece of aluminum foil for a while. That’ll blow your mind.
No, no, you misunderstood -- that's simple hormonic motion.
Cheers!
I'd rather fashion it into a hat, which will *save* my mind. /internet-lore>
Cheers!
It looks like most Phys.org articles can still be posted:
“Use of PhysOrg.com
You may not copy, reproduce, republish, download, post, broadcast, transmit, make available to the public, or otherwise use physorg.com content in any way except for your own personal, non-commercial use. You also agree not to adapt, alter or create a derivative work from any physorg.com content except for your own personal, non-commercial use. Students, teachers and professors are free to use, reproduce articles and copy PHYSorg content for academic purposes without obtaining prior written approval. The only request is users shall provide a credit and source URL link of the original PHYSorg article. Any other use of physorg.com content requires the prior written permission of the PhysOrg.com. If you would like to request permission to use any of the content on our sites, please review our copyright notice.”
I guess I stand corrected. This is non-commercial use, but not “personal.”
Bummer. I wonder how long this has been the case.
“Every couple has it’s moment”.
I think it’s supposed to be “Every coupling has it’s moment”.
At least in my experience.
Too bad, other than that ridiculous “Lenin was a democratic leader” bullsh- they helped disseminate a few years ago, I’ve been pretty happy with them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.