To: Hieronymus; VampireStateNY; governsleastgovernsbest; gaspar; NativeNewYorker; drjimmy; Atticus; ...
To: Behind Liberal Lines
America’s carbon-dioxide emissions are actually falling. In fact, they have not been this low since 1992 This is great news! Somebody go tell the left that it worked. We got our global warming under control. Their efforts paid off and we have seen no warming in the past 10 years. We can stop pushing for carbon taxes and such and die in peace. The planet will survive after all.
Congrats. What's next?
3 posted on
12/11/2012 4:43:09 PM PST by
Tenacious 1
(The Click-&-Paste Media exists & works in Utopia, riding unicorns & sniffing pixy dust.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
4 posted on
12/11/2012 4:50:21 PM PST by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
There is no so-called “CO2 Problem”.
9 posted on
12/11/2012 5:26:09 PM PST by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
There is no CO2 problem.
It is an atmospheric gas.
Why certain people and organizations think it is a problem is a mystery to me.
10 posted on
12/11/2012 5:28:58 PM PST by
elkfersupper
( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
There is no CO2 problem.
It is an atmospheric gas.
Why certain people and organizations think it is a problem is a mystery to me.
11 posted on
12/11/2012 5:29:17 PM PST by
elkfersupper
( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Bayou CorneNothing like a little methane to get your attention. These folks also enjoy the ability to open their faucets and light up. Free dead fish floating in the water are so much easier to catch.
Fracking may give access to more methane, but it has its consquences. Check the story at this link to see how it has destroyed a productive cattle ranch including the animals and ranchers.
Adding my agreement...there is no CO2 problem. It's a damn made up hoax.
12 posted on
12/11/2012 5:53:18 PM PST by
Myrddin
To: Behind Liberal Lines
To cash in on the carbon sequestration "market" is perhaps the principal reason the owners of the oil companies have been using their tax-exempt "charities" to make fat donations to the NGOs behind this "global warming" scam. Moreover, because big companies can more easily afford the processing plants for producing and delivering mass quantities of CO
2 and the overhead with which to track and speculate in credits, it would put them at a financial advantage over independent drillers.
Use of government regulations to restrain competition, as usual.
15 posted on
12/11/2012 9:30:00 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(The Slave Party: advancing indenture since 1787.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
There is a legitimate con argument against fracking, which is the 70x higher incidence of radon in the Marcellus gas.
Wouldn't it be great if we could have clean, nondangerous nuclear energy with no waste, as per the work of Andrea Rossi and others?
18 posted on
12/11/2012 10:22:34 PM PST by
Lexinom
To: Behind Liberal Lines
What about the Sun usage problem. America is using more than it’s fair share of the Sun!
20 posted on
12/12/2012 12:10:22 AM PST by
MaxMax
To: Behind Liberal Lines; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; ...
31 posted on
12/13/2012 7:15:30 PM PST by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
