Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Plastic gun' ban would make even less sense now than in 1988
St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner ^ | 11 December, 2012 | Kurt Hofmann

Posted on 12/11/2012 10:59:04 AM PST by marktwain

National Gun Rights Examiner David Codrea reports that Representative Steve Israel (D-NY) has announced his intention to renew the ban on "plastic guns," set to expire next December:

A test of a printed plastic lower firearm receiver has resulted in an anti-gun politician demanding renewal of a law against a gun that does not exist, Live Science reported today, citing a call by Rep. Steve Israel, D- N.Y., to renew “the federal ban on plastic guns just days after members of the ‘Wiki Weapon’ project tested a 3D-printed gun part in a live-fire test.”

The "Undetectable Firearms Act" was first passed in 1988, in (over)-reaction to polymer-frame Glock pistols--which had far more steel than could be slipped past any metal detector. An excellent short summary of the history of this law can be found at Prevent Tyranny, where we find that the 1988 law expired in 1998, and was not renewed until 2003.

Care to guess how many people were shot, or even threatened, with a "undetectable, plastic" guns over that five year span? If your guess was "zero, because no such gun existed," give yourself a cigar.

Still, that inconvenient little fact did not prevent then-Representative James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) from bringing this pointless law back in 2003, for another 10 years (thus the December, 2013 expiration).

Mr. Codrea also points out that Rep. Israel claims that he was prompted to renew this ban by news of a partially plastic gun (which fell apart after six shots)--which was never banned. If his new bill (not yet introduced, so we cannot know the details) would ban that, it would have to be a very comprehensive ban (every polymer-framed gun), covering vast numbers of very popular firearms.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ban; banglist; democrats; guncontrol; liberalism; plastic; steveisrael
I am shocked to learn that Sensenbrenner reintroduced this bill. I do not remember *any* debate about it. The left has alwas been trying to make the citizens defenseless by obsolescence.

This law needs to be allowed to expire.

1 posted on 12/11/2012 10:59:09 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

They’re doing everything they possibly can to get some sort of gun ban on the books. They want to get their foot in the door or the camel’s nose in the tent, pick your analogy. Democrats, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists are all scattershotting every law and regulation they can in the hope that something sticks.

It’ll just take one flake to start the snowball, folks.


2 posted on 12/11/2012 11:05:46 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

What fools we have for legislators. They make laws and policy concerning subjects of which they have no knowledge or technical aptitude.


3 posted on 12/11/2012 11:06:48 AM PST by USMCPOP (Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

don’t make much difference what the gun is made out of, the bullets are all the same..steel/brass, lead/copper, etc..


4 posted on 12/11/2012 11:14:50 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
I remember talking to a moron who saw one of the Die Hard movies, where "plastic and ceramic Glocks" would allow terrorists to board airplanes and cause havoc, and my response was that there was no such thing, and in fact, a Glock has nearly a pound of steel in it!

But he kept going on about how the "new technology" needed to be banned, and I asked him if he was going to try to get "Star Trek Phasers and Klingon Disruptors" banned too, since even though "there ain't no such thing," we need to ban the technology!

Mark

5 posted on 12/11/2012 11:45:47 AM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USMCPOP
They make laws and policy concerning subjects of which they have no knowledge or technical aptitude.

And don't forget that they will vote FOR bills that they not only don't understand, but don't even bother to read... Or even vote for bills that haven't actually been completely written!

Mark

6 posted on 12/11/2012 11:47:56 AM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: camle

they don’t necessarily need to be. ceramic could be used as
a projectile very effectively, and a case could be made of
polymer. would have less working pressure to work with, but enough to be effective close in.


7 posted on 12/11/2012 11:55:09 AM PST by RitchieAprile (the obstreperous gentleman..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
Democrats, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists are all scattershotting every law and regulation they can in the hope that something sticks.

It was a republican that re-intoduced the law in 2003.

8 posted on 12/11/2012 12:00:39 PM PST by null and void (Going Galt: The won't of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

It might have been a republican but that doesn’t mean they weren’t a liberal progressive socialist.


9 posted on 12/11/2012 12:15:01 PM PST by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Durus; All

Sensenbrenner has been known as a conservative Republican for some time. My only guess is that he put this forward at the behest of the Bush administration, as an “anti-terror” measure.

I was shocked to learn that he was the person who introduced it. It pretty much was slipped in “under the radar”.


10 posted on 12/11/2012 1:29:02 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Ah, good old Steve "Anti-" Israel.

He can always be counted on to assault the Constitution.

11 posted on 12/11/2012 1:56:47 PM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile
they don’t necessarily need to be. ceramic could be used as a projectile very effectively, and a case could be made of polymer. would have less working pressure to work with, but enough to be effective close in.

Metallic-cased or jacketed ammo isn't the big problem, it's the barrel and breechblock parts. Ceramics have lousy tensile strength and would more likely turn into a fragmentation grenade than deliver an aimed shot.

12 posted on 12/11/2012 2:33:40 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel; All
Ceramics have lousy tensile strength and would more likely turn into a fragmentation grenade than deliver an aimed shot.

Materials Science is proceeding at an incredible pace. I think that composite materials with a majority ceramic component could be made strong enough to withstand low pressure loads like some shotgun, pistol, and rifle loads. Low pressure loads can still be effective.

13 posted on 12/11/2012 2:40:44 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RitchieAprile

I have a ceramic hand grenade sitting on the bookshelf. It is empty, of course.

It was made in the waning days of WWII in Okinawa. Steel was in very short supply, so the inventive Japanese made ceramic (unglazed porcelain, I think) hand grenade bodies.

The Hungarians used lengths of water pipe to disable Russian tanks during the revolution of 1956. They’d run out of a side alley and shove a long piece of 2” or so water pipe between the lower tread and the rear sprocket. Popped the tread right off, leaving the tank to run in circles.

“Where there is a will, there is a way” to make a weapon. When Milton Obote’s second UNLA government was overthrown in Uganda there was a story of citizens beating UNLA soldiers to death using old shock absorbers.

Maybe we should outlaw NAPA or AutoZone? /sarc


14 posted on 12/11/2012 4:32:22 PM PST by BwanaNdege (Man has often lost his way, but modern man has lost his address - Gilbert K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

But they must be real! I saw the bad guy use one on CSI! It was even made with one of those 3-D printers.


15 posted on 12/11/2012 5:14:02 PM PST by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson