Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court will take up gay marriage cases (In Late March)
Fox News ^ | 12/07/2012 | Shannon Bream and AP

Posted on 12/07/2012 12:34:14 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan

Edited on 01/07/2013 10:04:55 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

The Supreme Court will take up California's ban on same-sex marriage, a case that could give the justices the chance to rule on whether gay Americans have the same constitutional right to marry as heterosexuals.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; notbreakingnews; scotus; ssm; statesrights; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: OKRA2012

This way, they can make every state recognize their abomination, not just California.


41 posted on 12/07/2012 1:42:33 PM PST by RetiredArmy (1 Cor 15: 50-54 & 1 Thess 4: 13-17. That about covers it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

IMHO, only churches should have the right to “wed” people (a man and a woman). The State should give civil union licenses, instead. That’s just my opinion.


42 posted on 12/07/2012 1:42:50 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare; Sidebar Moderator; I Am Not A Mod

Rumor has it that Sidebar is an expert in Jedi Mind Tricks.


43 posted on 12/07/2012 1:48:23 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Vision

That is a scary thought.


44 posted on 12/07/2012 1:50:37 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican

We’d still end up with the same issues regarding benefits.


45 posted on 12/07/2012 1:53:05 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CityCenter
There are many arguments that can be made about this issue, but for me the biggest one is that it impinges upon the First Amendment rights of free exercise of religion. If gay marriage is found constitutional that how can any pastor of any church refuse to marry gays or hold gay marriages in their churches?

That will never happen, even if SCOTUS holds there is a constitutional right to gay marriage. No case has ever required a Catholic priest to marry someone who has a civil divorce but not a church annulment. No case has ever required an orthodox Rabbi to marry a Jew and a non-Jew. If there is a right to gay marriage, it is a right to a civil marriage and to a marriage in any church willing to do it.

The same would be true of any religious person who has a bakery or a photography business, etc. They will be accused of discrimination and this will open the door to all kinds of lawsuits.

That is a different issue. A few states have already had lawsuits on that basis, where state civil rights laws forbid discrimination against gays in "public accommodations." I think those cases are wrong, but your fear is much more likely to materialize there.

46 posted on 12/07/2012 1:56:18 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

what a friggin few years we have had!


47 posted on 12/07/2012 1:57:05 PM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Well looks like all states will have to follow the upcoming Supreme Court ruling so I think gay couples and straight couples should be granted civil union licenses. If a civil union doesn’t work out, then the state can dissolve it. Marriage, however, should belong to the realm of the Church. That way, we can still defend marriage.


48 posted on 12/07/2012 1:58:56 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

this should be Roberts opportunity to come out


49 posted on 12/07/2012 2:00:03 PM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CityCenter

The right of churches to “opt out” has been destroyed via healthcare.

The road to hell has been carefully and deviously paved by liberals.


50 posted on 12/07/2012 2:00:03 PM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote
Tell me about it! I just found out today that Liberace was gay!

51 posted on 12/07/2012 2:00:52 PM PST by TSgt (...voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Thank you! And Merry Christmas to you and yours!


52 posted on 12/07/2012 2:01:32 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

I think what they will point out...is that only states can legislate this kind of stuff...Congress and the Senate can’t. And everyone will stand there in some agreement.


53 posted on 12/07/2012 2:02:01 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

;-)


54 posted on 12/07/2012 2:02:36 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
By the way, I wonder if Kagan and Roberts will recuse themselves.

On what basis are they recused?

55 posted on 12/07/2012 2:02:53 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CityCenter
If gay marriage is found constitutional that how can any pastor of any church refuse to marry gays or hold gay marriages in their churches?

Divorce and remarriage is permitted by law but the Catholic Church is not obligated to perform marriage ceremonies for divorced people.

Protestants are permitted to get married but the Catholic Church is not required to perform weddings for Protestants.

Just because same sex couples are permitted to marry does not mean that the Catholic Church (or any other church) will be required to perform gay marriages.
56 posted on 12/07/2012 2:03:29 PM PST by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

The Stool Pushers Union are all in for this one.


57 posted on 12/07/2012 2:09:05 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

I still thought the Sidecar Mod fell off a ship somewhere.


58 posted on 12/07/2012 2:14:03 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
On what basis are they recused?

The same basis a fox judge should not be in charge of a court that rules on whether foxes should be legally able to eat chickens.

59 posted on 12/07/2012 2:18:30 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Look at the military...They just had their first gay wedding....disgusting....


60 posted on 12/07/2012 2:21:30 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson