Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rubio: “There is no scientific debate on the age of the earth”
Salon.com ^ | 12/5/2012 | Jillian Rayfield

Posted on 12/06/2012 9:47:52 AM PST by ksen

After dabbling in creationism earlier this month, Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., clarified that he does believe that scientists know the Earth is “at least 4.5 billion years old.”

“There is no scientific debate on the age of the earth. I mean, it’s established pretty definitively, it’s at least 4.5 billion years old,” Rubio told Mike Allen of Politico. ”I was referring to a theological debate, which is a pretty healthy debate.

“The theological debate is, how do you reconcile with what science has definitively established with what you may think your faith teaches,” Rubio continued. “Now for me, actually, when it comes to the age of the earth, there is no conflict.”

GQ: How old do you think the Earth is?

Marco Rubio: I’m not a scientist, man. I can tell you what recorded history says, I can tell you what the Bible says, but I think that’s a dispute amongst theologians and I think it has nothing to do with the gross domestic product or economic growth of the United States. I think the age of the universe has zero to do with how our economy is going to grow. I’m not a scientist. I don’t think I’m qualified to answer a question like that. At the end of the day, I think there are multiple theories out there on how the universe was created and I think this is a country where people should have the opportunity to teach them all. I think parents should be able to teach their kids what their faith says, what science says. Whether the Earth was created in 7 days, or 7 actual eras, I’m not sure we’ll ever be able to answer that. It’s one of the great mysteries.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 112th; ageofearth; creation; creationists; deerintheheadlights; earthage; florida; partisanmediashills; rubio; science; theology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-279 next last
This won't make the base happy
1 posted on 12/06/2012 9:47:57 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ksen

Ok great thanks Marco. Now can we get back to Benghazi?


2 posted on 12/06/2012 9:50:57 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen
Let the Leftwing Media hit job on Rubio begin. He's a charismatic Latino Republican. That is a threat to the Left and their lock on minority voters. So the media asks him questions like this and harps on them to make him look like some nut
3 posted on 12/06/2012 9:51:30 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen

Actually, the title is pretty accurate.
There’s no way to use the scientific method to ascertain the age of the earth.


4 posted on 12/06/2012 9:52:53 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen

Not a big deal but could be handled a bit better.

In 04 Duncan Hunter gave a great answer to the question. He said it wasn’t important to him how God did it or how long it took.


5 posted on 12/06/2012 9:53:13 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

He ought to educate himself on the evolutionist lie.


6 posted on 12/06/2012 9:53:50 AM PST by TurkeyLurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

For me his charisma evaporates when he starts shilling for illegal’s amnesty.


7 posted on 12/06/2012 9:57:02 AM PST by Mi-kha-el ((There is no Pravda in Izvestiya and no Izvestiya in Pravda.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ksen

OK, Salon, now start asking the Obamadork about some of his beliefs. I believe there are N quotes out there showing Obamadork contradictions - get to them.

And, by the way, I don’t give a smelly Obama about Rubio’s beliefs on the age of the earth.

I do care about his beliefs on economics, which are a great deal more based in logic than are those of the dork.


8 posted on 12/06/2012 9:58:05 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen

The GOP candidates and potential candidates should not answer these types of questions. Do what the Democrats do, respond with scripted talking points.


9 posted on 12/06/2012 9:58:37 AM PST by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen
at least 4.5 billion

Is that the number of illegals Rubio would like to give amnesty to?

10 posted on 12/06/2012 9:58:53 AM PST by Yashcheritsiy (It's time to Repeal and Replace the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ksen
“There is no scientific debate on the age of the earth. I mean, it’s established pretty definitively, it’s at least 4.5 billion years old

BS. There is no such thing as settled science. Period. Radiometric dating techniques have all sorts of issues and assumptions related to them which make the age determination our best guess (if our assumptions happen to be valid, which we have no way of knowing).
11 posted on 12/06/2012 10:00:54 AM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
There’s no way to use the scientific method to ascertain the age of the earth.

My eyes almost just got stuck pointing back after my brain after I just vigorously rolled them.

12 posted on 12/06/2012 10:01:27 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

And he was out of the running before I had a chance to vote for him. Our primary system is stupid. Little inconsequential states deciding who stays and who goes.


13 posted on 12/06/2012 10:02:11 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ksen
After dabbling in creationism earlier this month...

So the MSM hits Rubio with a question out of the blue, and after he answers it he's accused of "dabbling" in the subject?

Is that like saying that Romney "dabbled" with contraception during the primary debate?

-PJ

14 posted on 12/06/2012 10:03:38 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: microgood

The precise number will oscillate around a bit and is debatable, but it is EXCEEDINGLY unlikely it will ever change to less than 4 billion years, or more than 5 billion years, and you’ll NEVER see it change to 4.5 million years, 450,000 years, or...6,000 years.


15 posted on 12/06/2012 10:03:55 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ksen

“Whether the Earth was created in 7 days, or 7 actual eras, I’m not sure we’ll ever be able to answer that. It’s one of the great mysteries.”

There’s no mystery, Genesis speaks of the Earth being replenished. Prior, there was the fall of Lucifer and the destruction that followed. If God says it took 7 days to make things right again then so be it. How old the Earth was prior to the destruction only God knows for sure, nevertheless there have been many scientific estimates.


16 posted on 12/06/2012 10:08:49 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist; microgood

I doubt God consulted a science text when he created.


17 posted on 12/06/2012 10:09:02 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ksen
Rush pointed out that this was a “set-up” question similar to the pernicious birth control question in 2008.

I'd like to see reporters start asking a better “set-up” question for candidates: “Do you oppose the United Nations and it's efforts to establish world government.

18 posted on 12/06/2012 10:11:01 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: microgood
“...Radiometric dating techniques have all sorts of issues and assumptions related to them which make the age determination our best guess...”

I agree, Radio Isotopes have been proven to be altered by contamination from heat & water. No accurate readings are possible. Case in point: Mount Saint Helens —
This comes from an established Geologist.

Other posters are right, it is an attempt to mix up conservative base. it'll work.

19 posted on 12/06/2012 10:11:40 AM PST by kimtom (USA on the Brink, Now Falling over the edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MrB

winner!


20 posted on 12/06/2012 10:13:53 AM PST by jagusafr (the American Trinity (Liberty, In G0D We Trust, E Pluribus Unum))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-279 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson