Could you provide a link to said statements you are claiming to be fact?
Or are you just regurgitating what you've been told or heard all your life?
Why, do you think such a position is so stupid that no creationist could possibly hold it? Are you going to go after that poster the way you do me? Say they don't believe in God maybe because they disagree with you? Ping all your buddies because you are afraid to debate by your poor little ol’ self?
for those arguing that bacteria resistance beign a form of evolution- a simple google search for “bacteria resistance is not evolution” brings up lots of scientific and biological evidence for why it is NOT evolution and nothign more than adaption- it was also shown not to long ago that bacteria that suppsoedly thrived on nylon already had the necessary coding that was simply reignitesd if you will to survive on nylon when NEEDED however the claism that the bacteria prefered nylon over natural sustanance was misleading and false- and hte scientisits finally had to own up to the fact that htey had intentionally mislead peopel to make it look like evolution was ‘taking place in the present day’
evoltuion is biologically impossible- period- not just improbale, not just highly unlikely, but IMPOSSIBLE- dirty chemicals were not able to produce the clean chemicals needed for even a hint of ‘life’ to begin- and the conditions on earth that evolutionists love to point to as making life possible was infact completely hostile and incompatible to the extrememly fragile beginnings of supposed evolution and chemical configurations as proven out by hte miller experiments which failed miserably and onlyt prove that it was not possible to create and sustain the right sided amino acids in order to ‘get the eovlutionary ball moving’ without some very serious and very intelligent artifically controlled circumstances which ARE NOT possible in nature-