[Servant of the Cross]

McCarthy dissects the 'Brotherhood' and its strategy in Egypt. The "Arab Spring" fable becomes "Sharia Winter". It is going to be long and cold.

And 0bama approves.

[Servant of the Cross]

Islamization Awareness Month

[Excellence]

What a terrible burden Mr. McCarthy carries. To be the voice of truth, crying out in the wilderness; in space, in fact, where noone can hear him scream. I will buy his paperback and add it to my collection.

[Servant of the Cross]

Ping. Andy McCarthy joins Pat Condell in educating the world on putting the word “Islamophobia” out of its misery and replacing it with the proper word “Islamization”.

[Track9]

I wonder if he had an equivalent to the ‘Cornhusker Kickback’.

[Travis McGee]

We’re going to find out, sooner or later, if Abdul will pray, to a glowing crater.

[thouworm]

I disagree with McCarthy on one point. He repeatedly credits the BHO Adm with naive and willful ignorance of the true nature and goals of the MB, while I think it can be proved (and will be) that the BHO Adm acted with premeditated calculation, from the very beginning (Cairo speech), to engineer the ME uprisings for the very purpose of installing the MB (accompanied by its more insidious and violently deranged spawns), knowing full well the MB's Caliphate goals of Islamist subjugation and sharia.

Excellent article by McCarthy (Cliff notes below).

With the trillion-plus dollars U.S. taxpayers have expended to promote “Islamic democracy” and its companion fantasy that elections equal democracy...In effect, Morsi has used the West’s democracy fetish to put a gun to his population’s head: Either democratically approve anti-democratic sharia or accept the sharia-compliant rule of your democratically elected Islamist despot. Some choice....

While Morsi basks in the spotlight, you should know that Shater [Khairat al_Shater] is the power behind the throne because he is the avatar of sharia. He is the author of the Brotherhood’s announced “Islamic Renaissance” plan, which the Western media continue to ignore. As Spring Fever recounts, however, here is how Shater proclaimed the Brotherhood’s objective in April 2011, right after the Islamist victory in the amendments referendum:

You all know that our main and overall mission as Muslim Brothers is to empower God’s religion on earth, to organize our life and the lives of the people on the basis of Islam, to establish the Nahda [i.e., the Renaissance] of the ummah [i.e., the notional global Muslim nation] and its civilization on the basis of Islam, and to subjugate people to God on earth.

Morsi was a constant presence at his side, introduced at rallies as an “architect” of Shater’s “Renaissance” plan. His principal task as president has been to get a new sharia constitution across the finish line. That is why he claimed dictatorial powers last week: not to aggrandize himself further but to shield the constituent assembly from being de-commissioned by judges.

Sure, it provides that “principles of sharia” are the main source of legislation, but that, the report crowed, is the same thing the Mubarak-era constitution said — the Islamists did not alter it. You are supposed to conclude from this that “principles of sharia” are not as repressive as plain old “sharia” (the formulation preferred by Salafists) would have been.

Yet, the new constitution actually goes much farther. Not only does it add provisions that make clear “principles of sharia” means “sharia”; it also installs the scholars of al-Azhar University as official expert consultants on all sharia-related matters — a longtime Morsi goal. Egypt thus becomes the Sunni version of Iran’s totalitarian regime, in which Shiite mullahs exercise ultimate authority.

And how exactly is sharia interpreted by the scholars of al-Azhar, whose alumni include such jihadist eminences as Sheikh Qaradawi and the Blind Sheikh? Not to wear you out with Spring Fever [The Illusion of Islamic Democracy], but as it outlines (with citations to the Azhar-approved, Brotherhood-certified sharia manual, Reliance of the Traveller), they interpret it to call for:

* death to apostates from Islam;
* “charitable” contributions to those fighting jihad (expressly defined as “war against non-Muslims”);
* discrimination against women;
* discrimination against non-Muslims;
* death to homosexuals;
* death to those who spy against Muslims;
* death by stoning for adulterers; and so on.

Recent related threads:

Egypt's top court suspends work in protest

Obama Administration Silent After Egyptian Constitution Restores Slavery

Remembering Some of Those Who Said the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt Wasn't a Threat to Democracy

Muslim Brotherhood ‘paying gangs to go out and rape women and beat men protesting in Egypt

[okie01]

Two questions:

1. Is President Obama, like most liberals, simply misled as to the nature of Morsi's Islamist revolution?

2. Or is President Obama fully cognizant of Morsi's motives and totally supports them?

Either is conceivable. Both are bad for the USA. One is borne of the standard liberal naivete, which would be a costly mistake. But the other is borne of evil intent and constitutes not only a serious security problem for both the U.S. and Israel -- but subversion at the highest level.

Clearly, the President is not acting in the best interests of the United States.