Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amsterdam's legal brothels are a brutal lesson for Britain : sex gangs and race
Daily Mail ^ | 23 November 2012 | Sue Reid

Posted on 12/01/2012 11:34:53 PM PST by george76

In a chilling parallel to the scandal sweeping Britain’s towns and cities, where a multitude of girls have been lured into sex-for-sale rings run by gangs, the Dutch pimps search out girls at school gates and in cafes, posing as ‘boyfriends’ promising romance, fast car rides and restaurant meals.

The men ply their victims with vodka and drugs. They tell them lies: that they love them and their families don’t care for them. Then, the trap set, they rape them with other gang members, often taking photos of the attack to blackmail the girl into submission.

...

Hard-line criminal behaviour is happening behind those windows. Girls are physically abused if they don’t work hard enough. It is slavery, which was abolished a long time ago in the Netherlands

Anita de Wit says ... There are thousands of girls being preyed on by male gangs in Holland.

Anita visits schools to warn girls exactly what a lover boy looks like, and makes no bones of the fact that most of the gangs are operated by Dutch-born Moroccan and Turkish men.

‘I am not politically correct. I am not afraid of being called a racist, which would be untrue. I tell the girls that lover boys are young, dark-skinned and very good looking. They will have lots of money and bling as well as a big car. They will give out cigarettes and vodka. They will tell a girl that she is beautiful.

Anita’s bluntness is a far cry from the approach in Britain, where political correctness has stopped police and social workers telling girls the same home truths: that in many towns, particularly in the north of England, the handsome men chatting them up at the school gate are very likely to be of Pakistani descent.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: dimmis; dutch; england; europe; holland; islam; morocco; muslims; netherlands; pakistan; rop; sexslave; trop; turkey; waronwomen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: george76

I find it helps, when I read stories like this one, if I repeat over and over, “Our diversity is our strength!”


21 posted on 12/02/2012 1:40:31 AM PST by spodefly (This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; ansel12

>> libertarians are not conservative

Nonsense. I’m a conservative libertarian. You’re probably a conservative statist.


22 posted on 12/02/2012 2:00:39 AM PST by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

A statist because I don’t think 12 year old, dope-smoking prostitutes should be legal.

Makes you all upset.


23 posted on 12/02/2012 2:03:42 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

You are left, we aren’t.


24 posted on 12/02/2012 2:03:42 AM PST by ansel12 (The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I meant, he probably thinks there is nothing wrong with illegal alien 12-year old dope-smoking prostitutes in a gay marriage.

Liberaltarian and all that.

:P


25 posted on 12/02/2012 2:06:28 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Why are you staining FR with that nonsense?


26 posted on 12/02/2012 2:09:02 AM PST by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

>> You are left, we aren’t.

Both you and the Leftists require the force of govt to apply your values. I’m for small govt.


27 posted on 12/02/2012 2:27:40 AM PST by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

That’s the key phrase: consenting adults. These girls are neither. These sex gangs should be deported back to their middle eastern sandboxes, to live with hideous, middle-aged ladies in black bags.


28 posted on 12/02/2012 2:47:48 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Libertarians condone neither force nor fraud. These sex gangs use both.


29 posted on 12/02/2012 2:49:29 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: george76

I know nothing about UK hookers, but I am very familiar
with Amsterdam’s red light district.
My KLM flights from Memphis landed in AMS.
Since I had plenty of time before an ongoing flight, I would take a quick train ride into the city.
The red light district was a very short walk from the main station.
It was interesting to see the girls in their display windows, but there was also areas off to the side where foreign girls worked.
I passed one such house that was populated with girls from the Dominican Republic.
One enticed me to come up to her room.
While I had no intention of engaging her in sex, it was interesting to see her room and how they operate.
Everything was very clean.
As I was ready to leave, she started unzipping my pants and undoing my belt.
I started making a quick retreat with her chasing me down the hall.
It was an interesting lesson learned.
Anyway, it is interesting to stroll around the district and see the sights.


30 posted on 12/02/2012 2:49:48 AM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

liberaltarians keep saying “consenting adults” but they aim to end the age of consent too


31 posted on 12/02/2012 2:54:36 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: george76

Something similar is happening here in the good ole USA:

“WJLA.com: The young woman you interviewed for your story was just 16 when she was recruited by the Crips. Tell us how it happened?

Pamela: The young woman I interviewed was a straight-A student from an upper-middle class family from Fairfax, Va. One day in the summer of 2009, she was standing at the Springfield Metro station bus stop and was approached by a Crips gang member. She says he was very charming and made it seem so “normal” to make money by having sex. Ultimately, he was preying on her vulnerabilities as a young girl who had low self- esteem and was still unsure of herself.”

http://www.wjla.com/articles/2012/11/gang-sex-trafficking-how-a-teen-girl-was-lured-into-northern-virginia-s-sex-industry-82084.html

Institutionalized white guilt is also a major factor helping the thugs enslave their prey. 40 years ago this young white victim would have not given the Crips gangbanger the time of day, but now to do this is considered to be “racist” so he was able to get his hooks into her.


32 posted on 12/02/2012 3:12:55 AM PST by Uncle Lonny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

...interesting model, but I think viewing this on a continuum expresses it better. Totalitarianism (Communism, other forms of despotism) to the far left, followed closely by Fascism. ...a bit to the right of that: Socialism, then Corporate Socialism, etc. (Democrats are Socialists, Republicans are generally Corporate Socialists.) The other extreme would be Anarchy, not Libertarianism.

For those not comfortable with Libertarianism, try “Natural Law” instead. There is not much difference, and Natural Law relies on morality. The Founding Fathers were clearly Natural Law proponents. They repeatedly referred to the Creator and Providence. The Declaration of Independence is the greatest expression of Natural Law ever penned - although I wish Jefferson had not dropped “property” from Locke’s original.


33 posted on 12/02/2012 3:21:29 AM PST by rashley (Rashley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rashley

Remarks appreciated. Definitely a coarse graph, but could probably support the plot points you mentioned.

The important thing to point out is the diverging transparent axes: the horizontal axis represents the moral divide. The vertical axis represents enforcement. Unless there’s another dimension, the plane should suffice.

>> For those not comfortable with Libertarianism, try “Natural Law” instead.

I’m getting tired of the belligerent bullshit on this matter. I have no intention of sacrificing definitive meaning for the sake of idiocracy.


34 posted on 12/02/2012 3:33:43 AM PST by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AlexW

Hopefully, you brought home a package of tulips.


35 posted on 12/02/2012 3:37:58 AM PST by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rashley
For those not comfortable with Libertarianism, try “Natural Law” instead. There is not much difference, and Natural Law relies on morality. The Founding Fathers were clearly Natural Law proponents.

You might want to go back and look up what the Founders actually did, the laws that they passed.

In today's world they would be considered extremist right-wingers when it came to "imposing their morality" on others.

The problem here is that we extrapolate from the Constitution to their views on society and laws in general. The Constitution is (from an historical perspective) a wildly libertarian document.

This is not because the Founders were libertarians but because they wanted a limited federal government. With rare exceptions the state governments were not limited at all, and used their powers enthusiastically to impose morality.

The Bill of Rights didn't even apply to the states till after the Civil War, and states violated them all the time. For instance, southern states made it a crime to speak in favor of abolition and prohibited abolitionist newspapers, both violations of the First Amendment.

36 posted on 12/02/2012 4:33:14 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

The facts are...libertarianism makes the same mistake that those statist forms of government make. They replace God’s law with human reasoning and consequently we can expect the same results should they ever achieve power.


37 posted on 12/02/2012 5:00:32 AM PST by Wpin ("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric; ansel12

Why is everyone picking on the librarians ?


38 posted on 12/02/2012 5:11:56 AM PST by onona (It's a good day to celebrate life, so I shall !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Two issues to ponder.

Looks to me you wish to be King. What laws will you impose?

One great feature of Libertarian thought - You are responsible for your actions.
You do drugs, you get no support from the G’ment.
You break the law you are prosecuted to the full extend of the law.

And yes Libertarian principles do not work in the real world with real people who have many faults


39 posted on 12/02/2012 5:12:56 AM PST by DanZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: george76
Every time Leftist do-gooders try to solve a problem, they make it worse.

The reason is simple: They cannot be truthful. Truth interferes with their cherished, preconceived ideas, and Leftists tend to be convinced that they can improve on truth because their intentions are good.

Honest people, committed to truth for its own sake, with open minds, in free and unimpeded exchange of ideas, can sometimes find the best possible solution to a problem--but of course this is anathema to the Left--just as it is anathema to any other brand of religious fanatics--because truth often conflicts with cherished dogma.

Leftists--and other religious fanatics--love their dogma, those things held as axiomatic, those things that their "faith" recognizes as truth; they have no interest in truth because it often conflicts with dogma.

If Leftists were capable of recognizing and accepting truth--truth for its own sake--they wouldn't be Leftists in the first.

However Leftists have only contempt for truth, so in love are they with dogma.

40 posted on 12/02/2012 5:17:37 AM PST by Savage Beast (The forces of decadence are the forces of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson