Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Promises on Gun Control
NY TIMES ^ | November 26, 2012

Posted on 11/26/2012 9:48:03 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: SoFloFreeper

“Mr. Obama is free of the pressures of campaigning - and free to lead the nation toward sensible laws that can help reduce the flood of guns and related homicides.”

Hmm, I wonder if the author knows the double meaning behind that sentence.


41 posted on 11/27/2012 12:29:09 PM PST by RWB Patriot ("My ability is a value that must be purchased and I don't recognize anyone's need as a claim on me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
If you wave a Twinky close to someone's face and eyes in a threatening, aggressive manner, is that assault? Would the Twinky then be called an "Assault Twinky"? Of course, carrying it along a little further, if you actually blind someone with a Twinky, it would probably be "battery", so it could then be called a "Battery Twinky", or a shorter version....maybe a "Batter Twinky".

Just wanted to clear up this "assault" weapon thingy. I may be mistaken and way off base, of course, so please step up and educate me.

42 posted on 11/27/2012 3:48:12 PM PST by Scooter100 ("Now that the fog has lifted, I still can't find my pipe". --- S. Holmes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scooter100; William Tell
Okay, so after shooting from the hip, I've now gone back and read all the threads and thanks to WilliamTell I now have a definition of an "assault weapon".

So, to carry on with my analogy, if a Twinky was an approved piece of equipment for military maneuvers, or for use during the final phase of an attack, i.e., "the assault", then, with proper modification, it could become known as an "assault Twinky".

The modifications might possibly be a hardened, crush-proof case, waterproofed, snap-locked, improved grip, camo-wrapper, etc. However, it is still basically a Twinky, with its fluffy exterior and creamy center...Yum. So, the various modifications really haven't added or subtracted to its intrinsic "Twinkie-ness".

Guess I'm just never going to understand the vagaries of this issue.

43 posted on 11/27/2012 4:12:42 PM PST by Scooter100 ("Now that the fog has lifted, I still can't find my pipe". --- S. Holmes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

“The American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.

Seems fitting that it ends with the colonists demanding to be disarmed.”

Uhhh - not to disagree, but those clamoring for disarming of Americans are commies (if the leaders) or they are either ParasitePersons or Urban Ferals wanting safer stealing conditions.


44 posted on 11/27/2012 6:12:42 PM PST by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is necessary to examine principles."...the public interest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
Tzimisce said: "The American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists."

I would say this differently.

"The American Revolution began when their own government, determined to collect taxes on tea and to punish the citizens of Boston for destroying untaxed tea, occupied the city with soldiers, surrounded it with the navy, and tried to disarm the people."

It's worth pointing out that Paul Revere did not shout, "The British are coming". He shouted, "the Regulars are coming out", meaning the regular army of his own government.

45 posted on 11/27/2012 7:18:19 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Taking guns from private citizens might be an easier sell for Idi Obama if he were willing to relinquish all weapons he has in his possession, including those he surrounds himself and his 3 bit**** with. The Kenyan vulture wants it all. His desire is to selectively eliminate all opposition and if he can use all of his weaponry against an unarmed force, he will solidify total control. How is Bo any different than Idi Amin and Robert Mugabe?


46 posted on 11/28/2012 7:33:43 AM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mikey_1962

It’s not about stopping criminal misuse of guns.
It’s about increasing what legally constitutes criminal misuse, so they have an excuse to jail your a$$.

“There’s no way to rule innocent men...”


47 posted on 11/28/2012 7:39:54 AM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson