Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: SeekAndFind
2 posted on
11/26/2012 7:51:20 AM PST by
Coldwater Creek
(He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadows of the Almighty Psalm 91:)
To: SeekAndFind
Why am i picturing Charlie Brown, Lucy and a football?
3 posted on
11/26/2012 7:53:19 AM PST by
V_TWIN
(obama=where there's smoke, there's mirrors)
To: SeekAndFind
It is odd that the court has decided to rehear the case so soon after ruling on it (and so soon after the election). I remember there was a theory floating around that Chief Justice Roberts only sided with the liberals because he thought the Republicans would take control of the Senate and the Presidency. He wanted Obamacare gone, but wanted to keep the courts “hands clean” and hoped the new Republican majority would repeal Obamacare. This case will give him a second opportunity to strike down Obamacare but still keep a semblance of independence, after all he upheld it once on different grounds...
4 posted on
11/26/2012 7:56:10 AM PST by
apillar
To: SeekAndFind
It seems like any reason at all is sufficient to opt out of Obamacare and, according to the law itself, nobody is really required to participate.
No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendment), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs.
http://www.coachisright.com/the-law-itself-says-virtually-no-one-has-to-participate-in-obamacare/
Does this work? Its from the Obamacare law itself.
5 posted on
11/26/2012 7:56:55 AM PST by
BuffaloJack
(Children, pets, and slaves get taken care of. Free Men take care of themselves.)
To: SeekAndFind
11 posted on
11/26/2012 8:02:23 AM PST by
cyn
(Benghazi. That says it all.)
To: SeekAndFind
I recall reading here that the moslem crowd in the US were exempt from barrycare. Wondering if that was for real.
12 posted on
11/26/2012 8:13:49 AM PST by
soycd
To: SeekAndFind
It’s just on that narrow issue only and I’m with whoever posted “why do I see Lucy, Charlie Brown and a football.”
You know it’s bad when the Obama admin also asked the Court to hear it.
To: SeekAndFind
They had the perfect opportunity to kill this monstrosity and not only didnt do it, the Chief Justice DID SOME FREAKING JUDICIAL BACKFLIPS NOT TO KILL IT. At most they might strip out the birth control requirement but I doubt they will even do that. In any case 99.999% of the law will survive.
15 posted on
11/26/2012 8:16:10 AM PST by
Brooklyn Attitude
(Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
To: SeekAndFind
What are LU’s complaints, specifically? What religious liberties is LU saying Obamacare infringes upon?
18 posted on
11/26/2012 8:20:06 AM PST by
ksen
To: SeekAndFind
Thiss time, I believe, the High Courts will strike it down. How about a prayer thread to that effect?
19 posted on
11/26/2012 8:21:25 AM PST by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: SeekAndFind
I don’t see how this mandate survives in the end.
21 posted on
11/26/2012 8:35:43 AM PST by
AFPhys
((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
To: SeekAndFind
How can muslims be exempted from the act due to THEIR faith? Unequal application of the law.
22 posted on
11/26/2012 8:52:02 AM PST by
Hotlanta Mike
("God only knows it's not what we would choose to do." - Lyric from Us and Them - Pink Floyd)
To: SeekAndFind
What they are really saying here is that the Supreme Court got Obama’s permission to make this decision.
Obama is running the Supreme Court.
23 posted on
11/26/2012 8:57:12 AM PST by
Venturer
To: SeekAndFind
LEAN Forward, Baby......here it comes....
28 posted on
11/26/2012 9:05:04 AM PST by
eartick
(Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
To: SeekAndFind; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
To: SeekAndFind
(shrug)
Now that we know the Supreme Court is comprised of three distinct factions - - 4 liberals, 4 conservatives, and 1 moron - - these kinds of cases take on more of a surreal air. I trust a coin flip to make the right decision more than I trust that assclown Roberts.
To: SeekAndFind
Hey, if islam gets a waiver....
To: SeekAndFind
This is how we must destroy ObamaCare now. With a thousand lawsuits, states refusing, the House refusing to fund, etc.
Too bad we couldn’t have just elected Romney. It would have been much cleaner and quicker. Oh well, off to the front.
50 posted on
11/26/2012 10:11:31 AM PST by
Persevero
(Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
To: SeekAndFind
Hey, CJ Roberts!! Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me!!
I don’t think anything will change.
62 posted on
11/26/2012 11:18:53 AM PST by
DustyMoment
(Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
To: SeekAndFind
Justice John Roberts is going to be a busy boy defending himself against all those blackmails.
84 posted on
11/26/2012 9:04:47 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
(Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson