Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/26/2012 7:49:00 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: SeekAndFind

GOOD DEAL!


2 posted on 11/26/2012 7:51:20 AM PST by Coldwater Creek (He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadows of the Almighty Psalm 91:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Why am i picturing Charlie Brown, Lucy and a football?
3 posted on 11/26/2012 7:53:19 AM PST by V_TWIN (obama=where there's smoke, there's mirrors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
It is odd that the court has decided to rehear the case so soon after ruling on it (and so soon after the election). I remember there was a theory floating around that Chief Justice Roberts only sided with the liberals because he thought the Republicans would take control of the Senate and the Presidency. He wanted Obamacare gone, but wanted to keep the courts “hands clean” and hoped the new Republican majority would repeal Obamacare. This case will give him a second opportunity to strike down Obamacare but still keep a semblance of independence, after all he upheld it once on different grounds...
4 posted on 11/26/2012 7:56:10 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It seems like any reason at all is sufficient to opt out of Obamacare and, according to the law itself, nobody is really required to participate.

“No individual, company, business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act), or in any Federal health insurance program expanded by this Act (or any such amendment), and there shall be no penalty or fine imposed upon any such issuer for choosing not to participate in such programs.”

http://www.coachisright.com/the-law-itself-says-virtually-no-one-has-to-participate-in-obamacare/

Does this work? It’s from the Obamacare law itself.


5 posted on 11/26/2012 7:56:55 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Children, pets, and slaves get taken care of. Free Men take care of themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Please, God, mercy.


11 posted on 11/26/2012 8:02:23 AM PST by cyn (Benghazi. That says it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I recall reading here that the moslem crowd in the US were exempt from barrycare. Wondering if that was for real.


12 posted on 11/26/2012 8:13:49 AM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s just on that narrow issue only and I’m with whoever posted “why do I see Lucy, Charlie Brown and a football.”

You know it’s bad when the Obama admin also asked the Court to hear it.


14 posted on 11/26/2012 8:15:28 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

They had the perfect opportunity to kill this monstrosity and not only didnt do it, the Chief Justice DID SOME FREAKING JUDICIAL BACKFLIPS NOT TO KILL IT. At most they might strip out the birth control requirement but I doubt they will even do that. In any case 99.999% of the law will survive.


15 posted on 11/26/2012 8:16:10 AM PST by Brooklyn Attitude (Obama being re-elected is the political equivalent of OJ being found not guilty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

What are LU’s complaints, specifically? What religious liberties is LU saying Obamacare infringes upon?


18 posted on 11/26/2012 8:20:06 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Thiss time, I believe, the High Courts will strike it down. How about a prayer thread to that effect?


19 posted on 11/26/2012 8:21:25 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t see how this mandate survives in the end.


21 posted on 11/26/2012 8:35:43 AM PST by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

How can muslims be exempted from the act due to THEIR faith? Unequal application of the law.


22 posted on 11/26/2012 8:52:02 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("God only knows it's not what we would choose to do." - Lyric from Us and Them - Pink Floyd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

What they are really saying here is that the Supreme Court got Obama’s permission to make this decision.

Obama is running the Supreme Court.


23 posted on 11/26/2012 8:57:12 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

LEAN Forward, Baby......here it comes....


28 posted on 11/26/2012 9:05:04 AM PST by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

31 posted on 11/26/2012 9:10:04 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

(shrug)
Now that we know the Supreme Court is comprised of three distinct factions - - 4 liberals, 4 conservatives, and 1 moron - - these kinds of cases take on more of a surreal air. I trust a coin flip to make the right decision more than I trust that assclown Roberts.


32 posted on 11/26/2012 9:14:44 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Hey, if islam gets a waiver....


35 posted on 11/26/2012 9:16:18 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is how we must destroy ObamaCare now. With a thousand lawsuits, states refusing, the House refusing to fund, etc.

Too bad we couldn’t have just elected Romney. It would have been much cleaner and quicker. Oh well, off to the front.


50 posted on 11/26/2012 10:11:31 AM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Hey, CJ Roberts!! Fool me once, shame on you.

Fool me twice, shame on me!!

I don’t think anything will change.


62 posted on 11/26/2012 11:18:53 AM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Justice John Roberts is going to be a busy boy defending himself against all those blackmails.


84 posted on 11/26/2012 9:04:47 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson