Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon Developing Underwater Sub Drones
Newsmax ^ | Saturday, 24 Nov 2012 02:44 PM | Paul Scicchitano

Posted on 11/24/2012 5:16:24 PM PST by Olog-hai

The Pentagon is hoping to one day be able to patrol the seas with unmanned submarine drones, according to website RT.com.

The website reports that the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has awarded a contract valued at more than $58 million to Science Applications International Corporation of McLean, Va. to perfect similar technology for the sea that has proved so successful in the air. …

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: pentagon; subdrones

1 posted on 11/24/2012 5:16:32 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Now THAT could get VERY interesting. With ‘nuke’ power, they could stay at sea for a century(or more?).

Don’t think I would like the idea of a drone ‘Boomer’. That’s one sub that I’d damn sure want HUMANS on.


2 posted on 11/24/2012 5:20:36 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I forgot.... Doesn’t even nuclear powered craft need to be refueled every 20 or so years?


3 posted on 11/24/2012 5:34:19 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Small sub drones could hide at depths manned vessels could never approach and pop up to sting an enemy sub or launch a few missile's very intriguing..
4 posted on 11/24/2012 5:59:01 PM PST by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

What an incredibly incompetent article (well, Newsmax is citing an incompetent article.)

SAIC’s ACTUV is an unmmaned autonomous SURFACE vessel, designed to trail submarines.

http://investors.saic.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=193857&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1757399

http://www.aviationweek.com/blogs.aspx?plckblogid=blog:27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7&plckpostid=blog%3A27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7post%3Af3c18264-f66f-40eb-ab0e-92d9a90f5a7c

Also, it’s not going to be nuclear-powered. There’s zero chance the US will ever put an unmanned nuclear-powered vessel in the water (not even one powered by radioisotopes, rather than a reactor.)


5 posted on 11/24/2012 6:02:48 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Current designs, yes. A century design is certainly possible.

Nuclear warheads need periodic maintenance as well.

Targeting will need updates (Who were we at war with 100 years ago? Spain was it?).


6 posted on 11/24/2012 6:03:26 PM PST by null and void (The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Zero chance?

How many things have happened in the last few years that you would have said had zero chance of happening in America just ten years ago?


7 posted on 11/24/2012 6:06:15 PM PST by null and void (The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
Doesn’t even nuclear powered craft need to be refueled every 20 or so years?

Maybe slightly longer than that, but it depends on how hard you run 'em. Besides they aren't really refueled anymore since that would involve cutting into the pressure hull. They just de-fuel and scrap them when the reactor cores wind down.

8 posted on 11/24/2012 6:09:31 PM PST by Tallguy (Hunkered down in Pennsylvania.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Guess NewsMax is having trouble finding news. They took an article from Russia Today (rt.com), excerpted it and added a little to it. This is journalism?
9 posted on 11/24/2012 6:13:15 PM PST by upchuck (America's at an awkward stage. Too late to work within the system, too early to shoot the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I worked on one of the industry teams that lost the competition for ACTUV Phase II, and I currently work with a lot of former nucs and submarine captains.

Given that the USN is currently constrained from practicing with active sonar because it might hurt the whales, there is no possibility we’re going to have an unmanned nuclear reactor or radioisotope source just sailing around. I can’t conceive of circumstances that would change that.


10 posted on 11/24/2012 6:15:50 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
"They just de-fuel and scrap them when the reactor cores wind down."

Had better hope we don't run into a situation where we could have brought a bunch of ships out of retirement, because we need every one that we can get our hands on. That's no worry though, since it isn't 1912.....

11 posted on 11/24/2012 6:18:17 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

That makes them NewsMini.


12 posted on 11/24/2012 6:19:59 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper (There goes the dominoes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

About time.....


13 posted on 11/24/2012 6:47:02 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
I don't think our enemy’s will have the same constraints...question will be how we respond...
14 posted on 11/24/2012 6:55:04 PM PST by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Not easy to communicate with things under salt water.
Depth is limited, speed and bandwidth limited.
Need to come up for orders (like, oooops, Iran bringing it home).


15 posted on 11/24/2012 7:25:07 PM PST by Leo Carpathian (FReeeeepissed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

tomorrow’s wars will not be fought by you cadets, but instead, off in distant places, by robots. and it will be your job to control and maintain those robots. /simpsons


16 posted on 11/24/2012 7:46:47 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
I suppose the very first thing we'll do after spending billions upon billion in developing one is drive the first working prototype right up on an Iranian beach!
17 posted on 11/24/2012 8:22:49 PM PST by Dogbert41 (What now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

With a gift ribbon and all.


18 posted on 11/24/2012 8:33:36 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

19 posted on 11/24/2012 9:51:00 PM PST by Brandonmark (OWCM is The new American Minority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandonmark

by FedEx?


20 posted on 11/24/2012 9:54:30 PM PST by null and void (The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson