I would also assume that Romney would get less than a token 4% from the inner city blacks.
f you take all the precincts where Romney got zero or less than 4% of the votes and set them to his usual black percentage (about 4%) then that would be a gain of two thousand or less in the worst cases (Cleveland, Philly). Basically the math is 100 or so precincts (divisions in Philly) times about 400 voters per precinct times 4% or 1600 max. Here’s the data for Cuyahoga: http://boe.cuyahogacounty.us/pdf_boe/en-US/ElectionResults2012/11062012UnofficialResultsbyPrecinct.HTM I added up the precincts with less than 4% Romney and it is about 100.
I would also assume that Romney would get less than a token 4% from the inner city blacks.
*******************************************************************
Sorry, I know it’s become politically incorrect to say there is voter fraud, but if you take 15,000 folks, 100% of whom intend to vote for Obama, there is sure to be a number of folks who err and unintentionally vote for Romney. Combine that with the likely (and I’m being generous here) average IQ in those precincts of 85, then the perfect 100% Obama vote is pure BS. Sorry, but there IS voter fraud and it is rampant.
We need FIRM voter ID laws. We need laws to make vote fraud a felony. And, ideally, everyone who votes should be required to leave behind on the voter sign-in registration sheet a single fingerprint next to the name of the person they claim to be. That would enable more sure convictions and, simply because of that, would eliminate MANY, MANY cases of “voter impersonation” fraud—the type of vote fraud I believe to constitute the bulk of vote fraud.