Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/20/2012 9:05:36 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: SeekAndFind
“..The White House or State Department did not make those changes. -—”

Clapper works in the WH and is in constant contact with Obama, especially in times like this. This is Clinton style parsing words to coverup the coverup. There is no doubt Obama himself gave the order to protect his juvenile bragging.

24 posted on 11/20/2012 9:55:44 AM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Okay?? I ‘m so glad that’s over. Maybe now we can find out what our US Ambassador was doing in a Benghazi “consulate”?

Why was he repeatedly denied additional protection.

Why were 40 some odd people originally left to die in a now confirmed Al Qaeda attack had they not been rescued by 3 American heroes?

Why were four US citizens, who were repeatedly denied rescue, left to die while “Senior Officials” watched on live TV.


26 posted on 11/20/2012 10:01:43 AM PST by PJammers (I can't help it... It's my idiom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Still doesn’t tell who invented the “video” meme.

Clapper is “good soldier” taking one for his boss.
He shoulda stayed at Space Command.


28 posted on 11/20/2012 10:04:20 AM PST by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Clapper going down the crapper...

“Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., told Fox News that intelligence officials who testified in a closed-door hearing a day earlier, including Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Acting CIA Director Mike Morell, said they did not know who changed the talking points. He said they went out to multiple departments, including the State Department, National Security Council, Justice Department and White House.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/16/petraeus-to-testify-knew-libya-was-terrorism-from-start-source-says/#ixzz2CmrJ1Fls


29 posted on 11/20/2012 10:05:09 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike ("God only knows it's not what we would choose to do." - Lyric from Us and Them - Pink Floyd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
This "who changed the talking points" is a RED HERRING. IMPEACH OBAMA FOR COVERING-UP THIS WAS A TERRORIST ATTACK TO SAVE HIS RE-ELECTION. Add insufficient security for Stevens and security and rescue DENIALS to the list of counts against Hillary and 0bama as well. CALL HILLARY TO D.C. TO TESTIFY NOW AND IF SHE DOESN'T SHOW UP, HOLD HER IN CONTEMPT.
31 posted on 11/20/2012 10:36:35 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
From Wikipedia:

In 2003, Clapper, then head of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, attempted to explain the absence of WMDs in Iraq by asserting that the weapons materials were "unquestionably" shipped out of Iraq to Syria and other countries just before the American invasion, a "personal assessment" which Clapper's own agency head at the time, David Burpee, "could not provide further evidence to support."[10]

In an interview on December 20, 2010 with Diane Sawyer of ABC News, Clapper indicated he was completely unaware that twelve alleged would-be terrorists had been arrested in Great Britain earlier in the day.[11][12]

In February, 2011, when mass demonstrations were bringing down Mubarak's presidency in Egypt, Clapper told a House Intelligence Committee hearing that: "The term 'Muslim Brotherhood'...is an umbrella term for a variety of movements, in the case of Egypt, a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has decried Al Qaeda as a perversion of Islam," ... "They have pursued social ends, a betterment of the political order in Egypt, et cetera.....In other countries, there are also chapters or franchises of the Muslim Brotherhood, but there is no overarching agenda, particularly in pursuit of violence, at least internationally." [13]

In March 2011, Clapper was heard at the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services and commented on the 2011 Libyan civil war that “over the longer term” Gaddafi “will prevail”. This position was loudly questioned by the White House, when National Security Advisor Thomas E. Donilon qualified his statement as a "static and one-dimensional assessment" and argued that “The lost legitimacy [of Gaddafi] matters".[14]

During the same hearing he was also questioned when he neglected to list Iran and North Korea among the nuclear powers that might pose a threat to the United States

Clapper has an interesting history. Doesn't change the fact that Obama "phoned it in" and left for Vegas.

32 posted on 11/20/2012 10:46:49 AM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Okay, let me get this straight. They didn’t have strong confidence in the person providing the intelligence that it was a terrorist attack so not wanting to provide information they didn’t have STRONG confidence in, they decided to fabricate a completely false story that they had zero confidence in. Yep, makes sense to me. Did they have strong confidence in their own eyes when they watched it unfold in real time or just regular confidence?
33 posted on 11/20/2012 10:56:13 AM PST by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

So it’s too “tenuous” to mention terrorism, even with patent evidence of terrorism, prior knowledge that an attack was planned, and Al Qaeda groups claiming responsibility.

But it is NOT too “tenuous” to pronounce that the whole episode was just some good ole boys reacting reasonably to video blasphemy. Even though that was known to be false before Rice, whose UN job has nothing to do with Benghazi, was trotted out as the designated liar.

I actually hope they were lying for domestic political purposes. The alternative, that the Obamans are really this stupid, is terrifying (if saying that’s not too tenuous).


35 posted on 11/20/2012 10:59:24 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Okay, let me get this straight. They didn’t have strong confidence in the person providing the intelligence that it was a terrorist attack so not wanting to provide information they didn’t have STRONG confidence in, they decided to fabricate a completely false story that they had zero confidence in. Yep, makes sense to me.
38 posted on 11/20/2012 11:14:53 AM PST by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson