Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Susan Rice will not be nominated for Secretary of State
American Thinker ^ | 11/17/2012 | Scott Varland

Posted on 11/18/2012 7:02:38 AM PST by SeekAndFind

After the 9/11/2012 murders of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, the Obama Administration was in full covereup mode. They required that someone go on five 9/16/2012 Sunday talk shows to make the case that our diplomats had died because of a YouTube video and not a terrorist attack.

The Administration did not want to pick an individual familiar with any aspect of Benghazi. He or she would have been subjected to challenging questioning (?) beginning with, "What did you know and when did you know it?"

So United Nations Ambassador Susan Rice was trotted out. Her relatively clean hands allowed her to present a false narrative and get away with it. Today, anyone with a lick of sense knows that she (however innocent) was the carrier of the YouTube lie.

President Obama will not even nominate Susan Rice for the position of Secretary of State for the simple reason that at the confirmation hearing, she would be grilled under oath about who briefed her (provided her with the YouTube lie) before her Sunday talk show appearances, the exact conditions of the briefing, and the extent to which she suspected that she had been chosen to propagate a lie. Her testimony would at the very least juice the scandal by sparking interest in the names of the officials who provided her with the lie and the names of the superiors who approved it.

She has been floated as a possible Secretary of State to give the President the opportunity to tar her critics as racists and sexists and to conceal the fact that she will not be nominated.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; secretaryofstate; susanrice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 11/18/2012 7:02:43 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We’ll see but I think this is incorrect. The idiot in chief will nominate her.


2 posted on 11/18/2012 7:05:21 AM PST by youngidiot (God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The position of SOS has become nothing by PC symbolism. Since Madeline Albright, there has been no substance in the job.
3 posted on 11/18/2012 7:09:48 AM PST by Cowboy Bob (Greed + Envy = Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

she won’t be nominated...Obama wants a black mail in that position....oops...looks like I made a pun...


4 posted on 11/18/2012 7:10:34 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot

I agree - Obummer thinks he can do whatever he wants. The other fallacy in this article is “she would be grilled under oath about....” since when has being under oath ever meant anything to this crowd. They couldn’t tell the truth if JC himself were standing in front of them.


5 posted on 11/18/2012 7:10:41 AM PST by Elkiejg (Democrats/Liberals/progressives are EVIL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot

Obama acted tough during that news contest, but he won’t nominate her. Obama made the conscience decision to discard her and her career the day he asked her to spread the lies about the YouTube video. All his bravado was to have a bunch of female Obamaite Congresswomen carry the torch from then on. He won’t mention it again. He has no problem using those around or beneath him to further his agenda. Goodbye Ms.Rice!


6 posted on 11/18/2012 7:13:24 AM PST by 2010Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: youngidiot
She has been floated as a possible Secretary of State to give the President the opportunity to tar her critics as racists and sexists and to conceal the fact that she will not be nominated.

I think the author is right. She'd have to testify under oath in her confirmation hearings about who sent her out with the ridiculous video story, and Obama doesn't want to risk that.

7 posted on 11/18/2012 7:27:49 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2010Freeper
Hate to disagree however since being elevated to the Thou shall not criticize a black _______, she will be nominated. Think the bonehead Repubs risk catching crap while they are out shopping for a bigger tent? With respect.
8 posted on 11/18/2012 7:29:12 AM PST by JohnD9207 (Isn't freedom worth fighting for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2010Freeper

Not Goodbye...good riddance.


9 posted on 11/18/2012 7:31:47 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: livius

She was fibbing then.

She’ll fib again.


10 posted on 11/18/2012 7:32:15 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She is a black women who was used by a half black president. It will be interesting to see what she does.


11 posted on 11/18/2012 7:35:17 AM PST by UB355 (Slower traffic keep right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How this ends up will be a sign of whether they’ve drugged him enough to at times offset his malignant narcissism. If not, he’ll nominate her just as a stick in everyone’s eye.


12 posted on 11/18/2012 7:35:23 AM PST by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
He'll just leave her as ambassador....no problem.

I would imagine by now that some of his white, male thugs are getting po'd that women are getting jobs that OBVIOUSLY belong to them.

13 posted on 11/18/2012 7:37:12 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

There might be more legal implications under oath in a confirmation hearing. She’s obviously not going to take the blame herself and the regime has run out of other people willing to accept the blame (although they may have a long shot if Hillary never comes back to the US...).

And I can’t believe she’d get away with saying that she just didn’t know why she said it! Something just came over her. Poor little her. That might be a bit much even for our ever-credulous senators.


14 posted on 11/18/2012 7:38:19 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Funny.


15 posted on 11/18/2012 7:38:52 AM PST by guardian_of_liberty (We must bind the Government with the Chains of the Constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Donate here!

FReepathon is still on. Day 49
If not now, when?



16 posted on 11/18/2012 7:42:56 AM PST by RedMDer (May we always be happy and may our enemies always know it. - Sarah Palin, 10-18-2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: youngidiot

Not sure on this one. Obama used her up, but it would seem consistent for him to think he could kill the sacrificial lamb and have it to.


17 posted on 11/18/2012 7:46:15 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Susan Rice really should have resigned when it was revealed that she was used by the administration (with or without her knowledge) to put out a high profile false story. Either way though, it's pretty clear they don't think she needs to tender her resignation since anyone who dares to question her will be tagged as a racist misogynist.
18 posted on 11/18/2012 7:48:59 AM PST by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

If Barky does nominate her, look for some real fireworks.


19 posted on 11/18/2012 7:50:59 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Anyone who criticizes Susan Rice is a bigot and a sexist. /s


20 posted on 11/18/2012 7:52:59 AM PST by OKSooner ("I will bless those who bless thee, and I will curse those who curse thee.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson