Skip to comments.
Video: Republican commissioner now in charge of West-Murphy vote tabulation
BIZPACReview.com ^
| 11/18/2012
| Michele Kirk
Posted on 11/18/2012 5:55:13 AM PST by SmileRight
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Finally, someone who knows what they're doing. Hopefully they will have legitimate answers there soon.
To: SmileRight
I am praying West is declared the winner but St. Lucie county is full of dems. Snowbirds is my guess, not natives.
To: ilovesarah2012
(Twitter post) Michelle Malkin@michellemalkin Allen West recount continues after emergency injunction fails; Teamsters show up to 'observe'; Update: Count resumes http://twitchy.com/2012/11/17/allen-west-recount-continues-after-emergency-injunction-fails-teamsters-show-up-to-observe/
3
posted on
11/18/2012 6:13:47 AM PST
by
sheikdetailfeather
(Yuri Bezmenov (KGB Defector) - "Kick The Communists Out of Your Govt. & Don't Accept Their Goodies.")
To: SmileRight
They suddenly FOUND 300 uncounted votes? How much you want to guess Murphy wins by 300?
4
posted on
11/18/2012 6:28:29 AM PST
by
WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
(The DNC loves abortion so much they will now be called the D&C)
To: ilovesarah2012
Yes, they come down here for 8 months to get homestead exemption and voting rights knowing that their own northeastern state will be blue without them.
5
posted on
11/18/2012 6:30:16 AM PST
by
autumnraine
(America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
I’ll bet you he just escapes the trigger for an automatic recount by 300—he may have legitimately won by more than that.
To: SmileRight
since their were no proven flaws in the election How about the 500 votes West picked up in the limited recount of early voting? This is one of the same arguments the left uses for not needing voter ID. i.e. no proven vote fraud.
7
posted on
11/18/2012 7:02:48 AM PST
by
MulberryDraw
(That which cannot be paid, won't be paid.)
To: SmileRight
Good luck on reestablishing faith in the American voting system.
The first and primary answer required is how did the county manufacture almost 70,000 more votes than there are registered voters. 70,000 fraudulent votes were cast in St Lucie County by the records maintained by the Democratic Party.
All other answers boil down to “Did you see the squirrel?”
8
posted on
11/18/2012 7:04:27 AM PST
by
Nip
(BOHEICA and TANSTAAFL - both seem very appropriate today.)
Can snowbirds vote in person in FLA and by absentee ballot in, say, NJ? or Wisc? or Mass? (or insert-blue-state-name-or-swing-state-name—here)?
9
posted on
11/18/2012 7:16:48 AM PST
by
N4EF
To: Nip
70,000 more voted than were registered?
I did not know that.
Could you give us more info? Like the number actually registed in the county, and the number supposedly actually voted?
This is the most “hugh” and “series” thing I have seen in a LONG time.
10
posted on
11/18/2012 7:19:22 AM PST
by
YepYep
(We've just GOT to love Jesus enough to LISTEN to Him, and Do what He Says)
To: ilovesarah2012
Wonder how many of them also voted up north?
11
posted on
11/18/2012 7:22:54 AM PST
by
RobbyS
(Christus rex.)
To: Nip
Okay, you are right.
The article says although 175,554 were registered in St. Lucie County, the number that voted Obama was 247,713, a difference of 72,159.
Something stinks to high heaven.
12
posted on
11/18/2012 7:35:10 AM PST
by
YepYep
(We've just GOT to love Jesus enough to LISTEN to Him, and Do what He Says)
To: RobbyS
I’d like to know that too.
13
posted on
11/18/2012 7:36:09 AM PST
by
Jacvin
To: N4EF
No one is supposed to vote in more than one location or more than once in any election;Democrats ,however, cheat.It’s what they do.
14
posted on
11/18/2012 7:43:12 AM PST
by
hoosierham
(Freedom isn't free)
To: YepYep
72,000 more voters than registered voters should have sent up red flags and set off alarms all by itself. And it’s not like this just happened in Allen’s district, either
15
posted on
11/18/2012 7:46:03 AM PST
by
stickywillie
(stanley ann went black, & never came back)
To: SmileRight
To: sheikdetailfeather
To: N4EF
Not legally — but I’m sure they do that illegally. That is traceable fraud and it should be pursued.
To: YepYep; Nip
70,000 more voted than were registered? I did not know that.You didn't know it because it is not true.
To: hoosierham
Republicans allow it. That’s what they do.
20
posted on
11/18/2012 8:18:51 AM PST
by
DWC
(historian)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson