Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Getting past the hype behind wind energy (anti-wind energy misinformation)
The Hill ^ | Nov 16, 2012 | John Droz, Jr

Posted on 11/17/2012 10:36:55 AM PST by DTogo

...Here are some other PTC tidbits that those smooth-talking AWEA hucksters won’t be mentioning…

A one year extension of the PTC will cost taxpayers over $12 Billion — how is that a good idea?

All that $12+ Billion will increase our deficit — how is that a good idea?

Almost all of that $12+ Billion will be borrowed from China — how is that a good idea?

A large part of that $12+ Billion will go to foreign conglomerates — how is that a good idea?

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boondoggle; debt; ptc; waste; wind; windenergy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
A one year extension of the PTC will cost taxpayers over $12 Billion — how is that a good idea?

FACT: For a one year extension to "cost" taxpayers $12Bn (over a ten year period) at a paltry 30% net capacity claimed by the ill-informed author (few wind farms get built today with a 30% NCF), that would require close to 21,000MW of wind to be installed in one year, which has never happened to date, and is not going to happen in 2013.

FACT: Every tax deduction or credit does not "cost" taxpayers one penny, it keeps private citizens/corporations' money out of Mordor's pocketbook. When is that a bad thing, or does private money belong to everyone now?

All that $12+ Billion will increase our deficit — how is that a good idea?

Maybe Mordor could/should cut $12Bn (bogus number) of actual spending elsewhere to make up for it?

Almost all of that $12+ Billion will be borrowed from China — how is that a good idea?

Or possibly printed in Bernanke's basement.

A large part of that $12+ Billion will go to foreign conglomerates — how is that a good idea?

FACT: The PTC is received by investors who pay taxes in the US and can claim the credit. If they happene to be a "foreign conglomerate" that's part of free trade.

FACT: The "P" in PTC stands for production. If a wind farm doesn't produce 1 kWh of energy there is not $1 of PTC to be claimed and the wind farm investors/owners, not Mordor, will lose their money.

1 posted on 11/17/2012 10:37:01 AM PST by DTogo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DTogo

Yeah, I like wind energy, where it’s windy. Flame away!


2 posted on 11/17/2012 10:38:46 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
Wind energy IS nothing but hot air. I am in the utility business, so I know what I am talking about here. You cannot generate baseload power from wind generation. That is power that MUST be available 24x7x365. Wind generators are notoriously unreliable, especially those with hydraulic transmissions. Even the greenies don't like wind turbines, because of the low-frequency noise and the number of birds sliced and diced.

Wind energy is going nowhere. It is another feel-good "green" luxury we can no longer afford.

3 posted on 11/17/2012 10:42:30 AM PST by backwoods-engineer ("Remember: Evil exists because good men don't kill the gov officials committing it." -- K. Hoffmann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer

I’m not claiming that wind can generate baseload power, it can’t. But there is free energy in the wind that can obviously be harnessed. The harnessing isn’t free, but the energy is.


4 posted on 11/17/2012 10:46:52 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

How’s this for a flame. The government is forcing my utility to buy the more expensive wind electricity even when cheaper alternatives are available.


5 posted on 11/17/2012 10:48:16 AM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
Wind energy causes pollution in coal fired power plants. The wind generated electricity has priority and the wind comes up the coal plant must shut down. When the wind dies down the coal plant must immediately increase power to make up for the loss of wind. Guess what, the coal then smokes in an emergency start up. Most of the wind plants here are idle as the owners collect money for electricity they do not generate so as to avoid the pollution.
6 posted on 11/17/2012 10:48:25 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
But there is free energy in the wind that can obviously be harnessed. The harnessing isn’t free, but the energy is.

???????????????????????????????????????
It costs more for electricity generated form wind than conventional but the wind is free? Coal is free but the harnessing isn't. Nuclear is free but the harnessing isn't. weirdo green ideas are free but the harnessing of them is the most expensive.

7 posted on 11/17/2012 10:53:42 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

We slapped down a green energy mandate in Michigan last week thank God.


8 posted on 11/17/2012 10:54:45 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

Eliminate all subsidies and we won’t have to deal with wind eneregy!!!

Same with solar!!!!

Build nuke plants and burn coal and oil!!!


9 posted on 11/17/2012 10:55:46 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion

If you want green energy there’s nothing cheaper than hydroelectric. Fortunately my state is relaxing the regulations for retrofits on hundreds of dams in the state.

Its like anything else, cost effectiveness is related to availability.


10 posted on 11/17/2012 10:59:26 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
Several countries in Europe have given up on wind power. That "free energy" is running them bankrupt.
11 posted on 11/17/2012 11:09:49 AM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

Always told my kids “quit bitchin bout not having and build your own” people throw away enough garbage to build a house car and all your applies every day use your head and use the refuse .....

http://www.instructables.com/id/Smart-drive-wind-turbine-3/

http://www.instructables.com/id/Wind-Turbine-1/

http://www.instructables.com/id/wind-powered-ametek-30-wind-generator/

http://www.instructables.com/id/Small-Wind-Powered-Generator/

Don’t take 12 billion to use and reuse anything nor a loan from the chinese to make anything work most of the junk thrown away in any given day was made by the chinese any way !


12 posted on 11/17/2012 11:11:55 AM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (100% voted Obama in precincts in Ohio ? NOPE i don't believe it ! someone CHEATED !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

I hope you have a 300,foot tall windmill as your next door neighbor. Then get back to me on how much you love wind power.


13 posted on 11/17/2012 11:13:48 AM PST by Kozak (The Republic is dead. I do not owe what we have any loyalty, wealth or sympathy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer
Wind energy is going nowhere. It is another feel-good "green" luxury we can no longer afford.

It is especially telling that, whenever a wind farm has outlived its 25-year federal subsidy, it is immediately abandoned -- as "no longer economically feasible".

"Wind energy" is a chimera. Practically useless in all but a few special circumstances.

14 posted on 11/17/2012 11:14:52 AM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

There is a small business owner that put one up in my home town. People that worked there said it cost about $450K to install the tower and windmill. He got a lot of it subsidized (aka we paid for it). There is also a life expectancy of about 10 years on upper unit. Long before they make back in energy savings for what they spent on the tower and unit, you have to replace it. It’s a money pit.


15 posted on 11/17/2012 11:16:28 AM PST by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer
Any knowledge on the incidence of maintenance for these monstrosities?
16 posted on 11/17/2012 11:17:41 AM PST by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

You have a regime which by design is driving up the costs and uses of energy the most a basic resource because it suits its socialist matrix. What’s even worse is the massive corrpution resulting from that regime doling out tons of funds towards its campaign donners for so called alternate forms which don’t work or are laughingly inefficient . This got a pass by the Romney campaign and a huge mistake because this policy affects everyone. It was a bread a butter issue that affected every “demographic in their pocket book Romney chose to ignore.


17 posted on 11/17/2012 11:19:48 AM PST by mosesdapoet ("A voice crying in the wilderness make streight for the way of the Lord")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Colorado? Loveland had a hydro plant that got destroyed by the big Thompson flood. It was quite effective. Longmont had a hydro plant that they planned on closing when the operators retired. It generated more than enough to power the water plant as some other utilities. Some of these do not even require a dam, just a diversion structure. There is a greater energy density with hydro than with wind.
18 posted on 11/17/2012 11:30:34 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer
"Wind energy is going nowhere."

I agree. As a source of power to feed the grid it will be for show mostly.

However I could see individuals putting up small units to subsidize their electricity needs especially if they invest in a low wattage illumination system like LEDs and such but then only if the systems warrant the cost of installing them.

I watched a doc on Wind Power called: Windfall. Most of the big units are heavily subsidized by Uncle Sam and they have all sorts of issues on the downside. For instance the really big units look like the blades are turning slowly, however the tip speed can exceed 140 MPH (according to the doc) Ice flung from the blades can be a problem so you need some fairly large "setback" rules so roads and walkways and private property is far enough away so as not to be hit by "ice missiles" coming off the blades.

There is also the constant noise issue of the blades and the turbines. then there is the sun hitting the blades at certain times of the day which gives you a strobe effect. It doesn't sound like anything but people living near the units say it drives you batty after just a few minutes of experiencing it.

19 posted on 11/17/2012 11:31:11 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
Build nuke plants and burn coal and oil natural gas!!!

Use oil for mobile consumers of energy (cars, trucks, boats, trains and planes).

20 posted on 11/17/2012 11:32:06 AM PST by NYFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson