Only one lone precinct in that entire County reported in at a believable 69% turnout( the next level was 118%) of eligible registered voters, as having voted.
So- is the Supervisor of Elections merely an incompetant jerk(ess), or is she guilty of more serious crimes?
It's either only one or the other.
59% would be below all other total vote reports.
They might just be so used to the totals that they didn’t bother to realize we would dare to question the high totals.
Maybe they did it to make us look stupid when we challenged them?
Jerk for sure...criminal? we will see!
I would like to recount those ballots that had to be duplicated and cross check them with hand count of originals. They can not be matched to their specific originals, I bet, but totals would tell the story if people changed the votes when marking them.