Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Girl Paralyzed by Drunk Driver Leaves Jury in Tears
yahoo.com ^ | November 15, 2012 | Dina Abou Salem

Posted on 11/16/2012 10:11:19 AM PST by grundle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: grundle

She has my sympathy. I just wonder when sympathy for the Americans run down in cold blood by illegal mexicans begins. Typical one sided leftist propaganda.


21 posted on 11/16/2012 1:30:52 PM PST by Amberdawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

I stand corrected on the attempted murder. However it still doesn’t apply to drunk driving unless someone shows specific intent to cause the wreck in order to injure a specific person.


22 posted on 11/17/2012 7:03:32 AM PST by waiyu (Common sense isn't common to everyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

I stand corrected on the attempted murder. However it still doesn’t apply to drunk driving unless someone shows specific intent to cause the wreck in order to injure a specific person.


23 posted on 11/17/2012 7:03:45 AM PST by waiyu (Common sense isn't common to everyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: waiyu
"However it still doesn’t apply to drunk driving unless someone shows specific intent to cause the wreck in order to injure a specific person."

You are correct; my point being that while most criminal codes may not have a specific charge for "attempted homicide," "attempted assault," etc., there is a general "attempts" charge that can be tacked onto virtually any offense, provided there is, as you pointed out, intent.

Because of the issue you identified regarding intent, the Texas Criminal Code does, interestingly enough, have a specific offense titled, "intoxication manslaughter," which would not apply here because the little girl survived, but it's kind of a specific type of depraved indifference charge specifically for DWI related fatalities.

24 posted on 11/17/2012 7:13:37 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
I agree with you

Making a special law for dunk driving is just not necessary and just adds more and more laws to the books.

Do we need a special law for driving under the influence of sleeping pills? Do we need a special law for each particular sleeping pill? How about an individual law for each TYPE of drink you were having? Is beer less of a crime than vodka..etc etc...

These are just lawyers making more laws and more money for ... lawyers

ANY stupid behavior could fit nicely into one of the 10 commandments.

25 posted on 11/17/2012 7:14:25 AM PST by Mr. K (some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
"These are just lawyers making more laws and more money for ... lawyers"

I have long held that practicing, admitted lawyers are officers of the court, and as such, members of the judicial branch of government. As such, it is a conflict of interest for them to hold positions in the executive or legislative branches.

I would fully support an amendment to the Constitution barring any practicing attorney, or one with ties to any active law practice from running for any legislative or executive position without a demonstrable 3-5 year period between when they last practiced law and electoral eligibility. The states would do well to implement similar requirements.

That's not to prohibit attorneys from acting as counsel to legislative committees, serving in executive appointments (i.e. AG, White House Counsel,) etc., but merely from holding elected positions in the legislature or executive.

26 posted on 11/17/2012 7:52:49 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

find an old copy of The Constitution and you will find that already in place about any title of nobility. Someone just conveniently made it disappear it still Law by the way it was never taken out.

It was in there from the first draft.


27 posted on 11/17/2012 8:05:45 AM PST by Lees Swrd ("Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe and preserve order in the world as well")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson