Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Connecticut’s Fiscal Mess. Democrats hid details of the ugly fiscal picture until after election.
National Review ^ | 11/16/2012 | Jillian Kay Melchor

Posted on 11/16/2012 9:06:13 AM PST by SeekAndFind

As Congress considers massive tax hikes to fix the U.S. deficit, the state of Connecticut is worth a look. There, a similar strategy is failing epically.

Governor Dannel Malloy’s budget chief told the state legislature on Wednesday that Connecticut was facing a $365 million deficit for this fiscal year. That’s nearly twice as big as the $205 million estimate released last week by the Office of Fiscal Analysis and the Office of Policy and Management. And it’s more than six times what Governor Malloy, a Democrat, had estimated before the election.

If you think that discrepancy is suspicious, you’re not alone. And consider this: Democrats, who hold the majority in both houses of the state legislature, voted to postpone the release of the fall consensus revenue forecasts, which revealed Connecticut’s rather ugly fiscal picture, until after November 6. Democrats say the delay was in order to give a more complete financial picture; Republicans say it was a political ploy. Come Election Day, Republicans failed to gain additional seats in either chamber of the legislature.

That’s a pity, because Republican lawmakers have correctly identified the problem: Connecticut has consistently spent too much, and then tried to fix the budget shortfall by raising taxes.

In 2011, Democrats pushed through record-breaking tax increases, to the tune of $2.6 billion in two years. They raised marginal tax rates on all incomes over $50,000. They hiked the sales tax on non-luxury goods by nearly 6 percent. They lowered exemptions on inheritance and estate taxes by $1.5 million. They nickel-and-dimed Connecticut residents with additional taxes on everything from pet grooming to pedicures to yoga to hazardous-waste removal. And, in a Sheriff of Nottingham twist, they even stuck it to the poor, ending sales-tax exemptions on necessities including non-prescription medications and cheap children’s clothing.

Pity the Nutmeggers. Connecticut’s Tax Freedom Day is now May 5, the latest in the nation, according to the Tax Foundation. Even before the record-breaking tax hikes, Connecticut ranked third in the nation for highest combined state and local tax burden. Now, the state’s debt per capita is $27,540, surpassed only by Alaska’s, Hawaii’s, and New Jersey’s, according to a report released last month by the non-partisan State Budget Solutions Project. And the Tax Foundation ranks Connecticut 40th in the nation for the tax climate for business.

Furthermore, while demanding financial sacrifices from its residents, the state government has kept on spending. When the fiscal year ends on June 30, the state will have spent around $20.5 billion, up from $19.1 billion in 2011. That’s a spending increase of roughly $1.4 billion, or 7.2 percent.

Meanwhile, the state’s tax revenue — for the fourth consecutive time — has fallen short of the governor’s projections. Statistics show that Connecticut’s high earners (a category that includes its small businesses) are particularly sensitive to income-tax increases, and are wont to leave when taxes go up. As early as the fourth quarter of 2011, Connecticut was witnessing lower-than-projected yields from its high earners, possibly because of population flight. As Connecticut continues its spend-and-tax frenzy, its remaining residents must know that another state is never more than 50 miles away.

All this adds up to an unsustainable situation. In the past, the governor has relied on quick fixes to delay spending cuts and manage the deficit. But now, the state’s Republican lawmakers claim their opponents are out of options. Earlier this year, Barron’s named Connecticut the worst-run state in the nation. And this year’s deficit is nothing compared to what next year’s is likely to be; government analysts now project that in fiscal year 2014, Connecticut will face a $1.1 billion budget hole.

Democrats’ answers are hardly encouraging. “It’s certainly premature to even speculate” about where to cut spending, according to Laurence Grotheer, press aide for Connecticut’s Democratic Senate Majority Office. “The session starts in January, the governor will make his proposal, and the legislature begins its work,” he told National Review Online on Wednesday. (Punt.)

So what’s Malloy planning? “The governor will cut spending to get there, and he will not increase taxes,” said the governor’s senior adviser, Roy Occhiogrosso. “We will end the year at balance.”

That’s a claim that stretches credulity.

— Jillian Kay Melchior is a Thomas L. Rhodes Fellow for the Franklin Center for Government and Public Integrity.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: connecticut; democrats; fiscalmess

1 posted on 11/16/2012 9:06:18 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The rats are starting to get desperate to hold on to their bloated, failed governement employees, retirees and parasites...O’Malley is like every other Leftist, a liar.


2 posted on 11/16/2012 9:10:58 AM PST by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I think it was Margaret Thatcher who said something like...”socialism always fails because you eventually run out of other people's money”.
3 posted on 11/16/2012 9:15:41 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Benghazi: What Did Baraq Know And When Did He Know It?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wac3rd

isn’t that huge indian casino in Conn?.....maybe the shysters can ask for a donation...I’m sure the indians financed the rat campaigns...


4 posted on 11/16/2012 9:22:18 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The problem with Connecticut is that there are simply too many rich people who run the place. However, they aren’t stupid, and they will eventually see that there is no end to tax increases.

Malloy only won by a tiny majority, the next time it might be the other way around. The main problem is lack of good Republican candidates.


5 posted on 11/16/2012 9:28:45 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wac3rd

I really hate living in CT. I am making plans to move in the next year.

What angers me, is that they had an emergency fund 2 years ago what that jerkoff Malloy came around. He drained it into the state employees pension. Then last year Hurricane Irene and the October snowstorm comes, it was bone dry. No emergency fund. So Malloy was first in line for FEMA aid.

He came in and raised every tax in the state, and they are still have problems. That included a “retro-active” income tax increase in 2011. I know what will happen next. They will raise them again.

I cannot wait to move. I know there are taxes everywhere, maybe I can hope there are less idiots/corrupts managing the money.


6 posted on 11/16/2012 9:30:57 AM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“It’s certainly premature to even speculate” about where to cut spending, according to Laurence Grotheer, press aide for Connecticut’s Democratic Senate Majority Office.

CT has/needs a Democratic Senate Majority Office? Further, this office needs a press aide/spokeshole? I ‘speculate’ that a place to start may be in eliminating both the ‘press aide’ (try using e-mail to make announcements)and the “Democratic Senate Majority Office” (why is there a need for this office?).


7 posted on 11/16/2012 9:37:09 AM PST by muglywump (Seven days without laughter makes one weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muglywump

Yet another state to stay out of. Let them fester in their own juices.


8 posted on 11/16/2012 9:39:06 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: castlegreyskull

Malloy sucks, to be sure. But I really do find a few things about living here fascinating (if I didn’t have to pay for it, that is.)

It speaks to what’s going to bankrupt the whole country: Malloy tries to make cuts – some silly, sure, but he actually tried to do “little” things like close a bunch of the Welcome Centers to save a few million. “OH NO! YOU CAN’T CLOSE THE WELCOME CENTERS!!!” cried the populace.

He actually tried (as much as a Dem can) to take on the teacher’s unions. “OH NO! YOU CAN’T DO THAT!” cried the populace.

Reduce state pensioners? “OH NO! YOU CAN’T DO THAT” cried the populace.

It’s a joke. Get a job with the state and you can be an incompetent buffoon but you’l get early retirement and a full pension and guaranteed promotion/raises. Work there long enough and you lose sight of the real world and actually feel persecuted. It’s a conversation I’ve had a million times – as my wife works at a large insurance employer that continues to lay off highly skilled workers every couple months, year after year.

It’s insanity.

The Bigger picture point is, the majority of the nation will never, ever allow real cuts to ever be made ever and any politician that does it, will be out of a job. Term limits would solve that issue in a heartbeat.


9 posted on 11/16/2012 9:41:39 AM PST by whattajoke (Let's keep Conservatism real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
Great explanation, worked their for 15 years or so, lived their one, I am glad I am gone.

America had a choice between a GM mgt style vs. a Ford / Mulally downsizing, re-engineering processes and getting healthy.

America chose and CT especially chose the GM model.

It is that simple, we are so screwed.

We has individuals need to metaphorically divest of GM stock, i.e. prepare for the crash of the leviathan, it is 2004 and like George Will predicted, we can see it coming....

10 posted on 11/16/2012 9:47:24 AM PST by taildragger (( Tighten the 5 point harness and brace for Impact Freepers, ya know it's coming..... ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Sounds just like what they did in New Jersey. Corzine handed CHristie a much bigger deficit than they were disclosing.


11 posted on 11/16/2012 9:54:59 AM PST by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

“The main problem is lack of good Republican candidates.”

Not really. We had some really good candidates in my area. They were even polling at over 60%. They lost by over 50%.

It’s clear that there was some serious screwing with the election.


12 posted on 11/16/2012 10:00:07 AM PST by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well the state was happy to announce on the front pages the other day that the State of Ct. Is leading the way on implementing Obamas Health care exchanges,so there,that will solve the fiscal train wreck of the Democrat socialist state of ct.


13 posted on 11/16/2012 10:06:24 AM PST by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

voters are so used to be lying lied to on some states, this will get about 5 secs. on the news, if that.


14 posted on 11/16/2012 10:58:14 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: castlegreyskull

I live in California, the same over-staffed, overpaid and underworked thousands of state workers, past and present, still munch at the trough like a famished hog.

The Democrats have one play in their playbook...raise taxes and fees on business.

They produce nothing, and the parasites keep on eating what the state workers haven’t eaten, so their only source of cash is to shake down businesses.

Trust me, the feeders and the looters will demand more and more as the unions, illegals and welfare class (see illegals) continue to squeeze businesses to relocate or close (see Hostess).

Hunker down, Obama, Holder and Malloy (and that Libtard O’Malley in MD) will be coming for your guns and 401K.


15 posted on 11/16/2012 11:06:36 AM PST by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Wanna see my shocked face?


16 posted on 11/16/2012 11:06:49 AM PST by McGruff (No New RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry
“...I’m sure the indians financed the rat campaigns...”

Their more Conservative then you would think. n/s

17 posted on 11/16/2012 11:07:24 AM PST by cameraeye (A happy kuffir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Tom Scott in 1994 wanted to repeal the income tax that was passed by Gov. Wackjob (L.P. Wiecker). I was campaigning for him because I knew it would be troublesome with LIBERALS in charge.

Tom Scott should've been elected rather than Rowland, but what is really needed in Hartford is a STRONG CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN PARTY and not these RINOs.

18 posted on 11/16/2012 1:08:46 PM PST by ExCTCitizen (More Republicans stayed home then the margin of victory of O's Win...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bfl


19 posted on 11/16/2012 1:35:39 PM PST by Dr. Thorne ("How long, O Lord, holy and true?" - Rev. 6:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

He didn’t win, his rodent buddies stole the race for him.


20 posted on 11/16/2012 4:50:13 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All
While trying to find some info on CT spending I ran across this website State Budget Solutions

Lots of info on budgets for fifty states. (Information for seven states seems to be unavailable).

Impeach the kenyan or secession.


21 posted on 11/16/2012 5:58:03 PM PST by ex91B10 (We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke

Malloy has surprised me a few times. On one hand he looked like he was taking the budget seriously, raising taxes and making a few of the cuts you mentioned. On the other hand when push came to shove there was no layoffs(no benefits reform), and he bent over for the unions everytime. I honestly think it is impossible.

CT is actually a beautiful place. I think there are many nice people. However, I think I pay a whole lot more for the same standard of living I could get in Alabama for a whole lot less.


22 posted on 11/16/2012 11:11:17 PM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson