Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The G Man

Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified in a closed-door hearing Friday morning that his agency determined immediately after the Sept. 11 Libya attack that “Al Qaeda involvement” was suspected — but the line was taken out in the final version circulated to administration officials, according to a top lawmaker who was briefed.

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who spoke to reporters after Petraeus testified before the House Intelligence Committee, indicated he and other lawmakers still have plenty of questions about the aftermath of the attack.

“No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points,” he said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/16/petraeus-to-testify-knew-libya-was-terrorism-from-start-source-says/#ixzz2COnNlYan


8 posted on 11/16/2012 7:19:01 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Oldeconomybuyer
his agency determined immediately after the Sept. 11 Libya attack that “Al Qaeda involvement” was suspected

So don't blame the Petraeus.

but the line was taken out in the final version circulated to administration officials

So don't blame the "administration"

“No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points,” he said.

Blame "Mr. Nobody".

We are dealing with crooks and children.
39 posted on 11/16/2012 7:43:33 AM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified in a closed-door hearing Friday morning that his agency determined immediately after the Sept. 11 Libya attack that “Al Qaeda involvement” was suspected — but the line was taken out in the final version circulated to administration officials, according to a top lawmaker who was briefed.

This is too easy. If the head of an agency forwarded or sent his report to his boss, and someone altered it, then it would have to be someone in the management hierarchy above Petraeus. That should be a very short list!

Who was above Petraeus? Who had the authority to unilaterally change the content of the report?

42 posted on 11/16/2012 7:49:39 AM PST by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points,” he said.”

My bet is on Valerie Jarrett, the psuedo-commander in chief...


49 posted on 11/16/2012 7:55:42 AM PST by fivecatsandadog (Don't let reality ruin your day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
“No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points,” he said.

Not even the head of the CIA.

General Petraeus


75 posted on 11/16/2012 8:24:44 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I found Peter King’s affect this morning so unnerving, his words went right over my head.

It was as if he was using a tremendous amount of energy to keep his emotions in check. Anger? Surely. At one point he seemed to be on the verge of tears. Peter King is no Boehner, that is for damned sure.

I don’t know. Could be my imagination or the fog of morning, but I found it strange. Anyone else?


153 posted on 11/16/2012 11:03:41 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson