To: The G Man
Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified in a closed-door hearing Friday morning that his agency determined immediately after the Sept. 11 Libya attack that “Al Qaeda involvement” was suspected — but the line was taken out in the final version circulated to administration officials, according to a top lawmaker who was briefed.
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who spoke to reporters after Petraeus testified before the House Intelligence Committee, indicated he and other lawmakers still have plenty of questions about the aftermath of the attack.
“No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points,” he said.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/16/petraeus-to-testify-knew-libya-was-terrorism-from-start-source-says/#ixzz2COnNlYan
8 posted on
11/16/2012 7:19:01 AM PST by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
his agency determined immediately after the Sept. 11 Libya attack that Al Qaeda involvement was suspected
So don't blame the Petraeus.
but the line was taken out in the final version circulated to administration officials
So don't blame the "administration"
No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points, he said.
Blame "Mr. Nobody".
We are dealing with crooks and children.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified in a closed-door hearing Friday morning that his agency determined immediately after the Sept. 11 Libya attack that Al Qaeda involvement was suspected but the line was taken out in the final version circulated to administration officials, according to a top lawmaker who was briefed.This is too easy. If the head of an agency forwarded or sent his report to his boss, and someone altered it, then it would have to be someone in the management hierarchy above Petraeus. That should be a very short list!
Who was above Petraeus? Who had the authority to unilaterally change the content of the report?
42 posted on
11/16/2012 7:49:39 AM PST by
olezip
To: Oldeconomybuyer
No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points, he said.”
My bet is on Valerie Jarrett, the psuedo-commander in chief...
49 posted on
11/16/2012 7:55:42 AM PST by
fivecatsandadog
(Don't let reality ruin your day.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points, he said.Not even the head of the CIA.
General Petraeus
75 posted on
11/16/2012 8:24:44 AM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I found Peter King’s affect this morning so unnerving, his words went right over my head.
It was as if he was using a tremendous amount of energy to keep his emotions in check. Anger? Surely. At one point he seemed to be on the verge of tears. Peter King is no Boehner, that is for damned sure.
I don’t know. Could be my imagination or the fog of morning, but I found it strange. Anyone else?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson