Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Readies His Revenge on the "Rich"
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | November 14, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 11/14/2012 12:22:24 PM PST by Kaslin

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Now, Obama's meeting with the CEOs. This is being portrayed as Obama wanting to have dialogue. "He really wants to talk to these guys. He wants to learn from them. He wants to work together with them in order to come up with mutually agreeable policies, 'cause he's open to anything that will work." Ahem. Instead, what's gonna happen is Obama's bringing the guys in there.

He's speaking from a teleprompter and he's gonna read them the way world works. He's gonna tell them the way life is. He's gonna tell 'em what their future is. He's gonna let 'em say whatever they want to say and the meeting's gonna be over, and that's it. And what's he gonna do? If you wondered what he meant during the campaign by, "Get your revenge by voting," this may be it.

"President Obama is taking a hard line with congressional Republicans heading into negotiations over the year-end 'fiscal cliff,' making no opening concessions and calling for far more in new taxes than Republicans have so far been willing to consider." In fact, Obama is now claiming he wants to double the tax increases on corporations and the wealthy from what he claimed during the campaign.

Maybe not quite double, but $1.6 trillion.

That's the tax increase on corporations and the wealthy. This is the new tone, the new bipartisan spirit that he promised and what the American people voted for. "Obama is taking a hard line." So these CEOs are being brought in today to be told what's what. "Obama plans to open talks using his most recent budget proposal, which sought to raise taxes on corporations and the wealthy by $1.6 trillion over the next decade...

"That's double the sum that House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) offered Obama during secret debt negotiations in 2011." So Boehner offered to play ball. We're just learning this. Boehner offered to play ball on new "revenue," $800 billion. Obama has come back in this new spirit of bipartisanship and a new tone that he promised us during the campaign and that the American people voted for.

He now says, "You know, screw that $800 billion, Boehner! Screw you and screw the $1.6 trillion now. What are you gonna do about it? I won! Well, you want a select committee on Benghazi? Go right ahead. Go, go, go, and ask for it. I already talked to Harry Reid. You think you're gonna get to first base on that select committee? Yeah, Petraeus is coming up to testify. You really think he's gonna testify against me?

"Ha-ha-ha! You guys keep on dreaming all you want. But I just tell you, you better get ready: $1.6 trillion in tax hikes. That's for openers, and then the next thing I'm gonna do..." If you go to the end of this Washington Post story: "In addition to raising taxes, Obama proposed to [cut] $340 billion from health-care programs..." Exactly what the Republicans said during the campaign! We told you: He's going to cut health care. He's gonna take it out of Medicare and Medicaid.

The Democrats said, "They're lying! How dare they lie about our president? He would never cut health care." It's his bill. He's cutting health care by $340 billion. All these "fact-checkers" told us that cuts to health care programs are a Republican lie, as is saving $1 trillion from ending of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's a lie. Those savings, if you even call 'em that (I don't even concede that), were factored in long time ago.

Even in this story, even in this story guess who is blamed for the current economic plight that we are in? Bush! George W. Bush is blamed even in this story. The reason Obama has to take these drastic measures is because of the irresponsibility of the Bush administration. So everything that you and I suspected that Obama would do is happening. Massive tax increases that will totally shut down economic activity.

This $1.6 trillion in taxes on corporations and the wealthy is in addition to the Obamacare taxes. "Obama has been pressing to let the George W. Bush-era tax cuts expire at the end of the year for the wealthiest 2% of the nation's households, a tax hike adamantly opposed by Republicans. But Carney suggested that even the revenue generated by letting those tax cuts end would not be enough to tame the national debt and..."

No kidding! Of course it isn't. Do you know how much money is raised by eliminating the Bush tax cuts? It's $824 billion. We're now looking, ladies, at our fifth trillion-plus-dollar deficit. So all during the campaign we shouted our lungs out, we shouted from the mountaintop, "You cannot reduce the deficit, you can't even make a dent in the deficit by letting the Bush tax rates expire! There's not enough money. You can't do it.

"In fact, if you confiscate all the money the rich have over a million dollars, you run the government for six weeks and then you're out of money. That's how much money we're spending. That's how much money that we are watching go out the door and how much money we're borrowing," and now the regime admits it! Jay Carney admits "even the revenue generated by letting those tax cuts end would not be enough."

That's why we have to raise them even more!

It's exactly what was said during the campaign. It's exactly what we said. But the bottom line is, folks, this has nothing to do with generating or gaining more revenue, because it won't. This is gonna shut down the engine that produces and creates wealth, which creates revenue. This is nothing other than punishment. This is the "revenge" that Obama was talking about in the campaign. This is punishment of the rich, punishment of the successful. Because "the rich," in his world, are defined as 200 grand a year and up.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: taxassets; taxbuffetsassets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2012 12:22:26 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

RE: Obama Readies His Revenge on the “Rich”

Exactly what did the “Rich” do to Obama that makes him yearn for revenge?

Was his father or mother killed by the “rich”? If not, what the heck is he seeking revenge for?


2 posted on 11/14/2012 12:29:16 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The wealthiest people in the country are Obama voters.

They don’t mind paying more and I don’t want to pay more than them.

The GOP should not go to bat for the uber-rich. It will never get their votes.


3 posted on 11/14/2012 12:29:38 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

O’s going to cry like a little baby when corporate America lays off millions of Americans to avoid Obamacare and moves their companies overseas and he doesn’t get ANY of their tax money. He forgets those people rose to power on their own sweat and ideas; the job creators are harder working and more strong willed than the dope that elected him and they are going to turn on him when they realize he killed their jobs and our economy and that there’s no one left to pay for the goods those evil capitalists that employed them. Boy the Left is in for a wakeup call soon. Utopia / false dreams....poof * gone....Have fun eating your own, sons...: )


4 posted on 11/14/2012 12:33:09 PM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I never met anyone named Super Rich.

Hell, I've barely met Mr. I pay you, Wealthy.

Super rich is a couple of words that mean as much as jumbo shrimp.

Name names, mr. zero.

5 posted on 11/14/2012 12:34:30 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

Fortune 500 CEOs are liberal. They can absorb the cost of doing business. They won’t notice a few million more in taxes.

Small business owners - unless they make more than $200,000 a year - Obama’s taxes won’t impact them that much and even then they can avoid paying more taxes.

We’re talking about higher taxes on a Democrat constituency. Its not in conservatives’ interests to save them from themselves.


6 posted on 11/14/2012 12:38:47 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

O’s going to cry like a little baby when corporate America lays off millions of Americans to avoid Obamacare and moves their companies overseas and he doesn’t get ANY of their tax money. He forgets that those very people who started their own companies and rose to power did so on their own sweat and ideas; that the job creators are harder working and more strong willed than the doped that elected him and they are going to turn on him when they realize he killed their jobs and our economy and that there’s no one left with any money to pay for the goods and services that those evil capitalists produced that were also employing them. Boy the Left is in for a wakeup call soon. Utopia / false dreams....poof * gone....Have fun eating your own, boys....; )


7 posted on 11/14/2012 12:38:57 PM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
He's not punishing "the rich". He's punishing high income earners. It's not the same thing. Obama's wealthy donors and benefactors often have little or no earned income to tax. Their money is inherited and transferred through life insurance trusts, tax-free municipal bonds, real estate investment trusts, "charitable" foundations, and the like.

Capitalist entrepreneurs and producers are his target - so that government can eliminate its competitors as the font of all "investment".

8 posted on 11/14/2012 12:40:50 PM PST by andy58-in-nh (Cogito, ergo armatum sum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knarf

Really? Look at how the toniest communities in America vote.

They don’t mind. Why are you defending them?


9 posted on 11/14/2012 12:40:53 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Lenin, too, cultivated his contacts among the more successful members of society - until he had them stood up against a wall and shot as he confiscated their fortunes and absorbed them into his corrupt regime.

Those who ignore the lessons of history are bound to repeat them.


10 posted on 11/14/2012 12:41:21 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
He ain't gonn'a cry and he ain't gonn'a wonder what happened ... this is the plan.

WE see it coming ... WE will be against the wall and be forced to respond.

I hate this trojan horse, agent provocateur

11 posted on 11/14/2012 12:42:06 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m convinced that Borat 0bama is really Jim Jones returned from the dead.


12 posted on 11/14/2012 12:46:48 PM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

The very rich pursue tax avoidance strategies.

That’s why they can vote liberal and Obama’s threats don’t faze them.

At the end of the day, even with all these promised “higher” taxes they’ll pay little to nothing.

They can be Democrats and someone else can pick up the costs of their support for the Left.

The poorest and richest people in the country have a good deal more in common than people think.


13 posted on 11/14/2012 12:46:50 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

> “President Obama is taking a hard line with congressional Republicans heading into negotiations over the year-end ‘fiscal cliff,’ making no opening concessions and calling for far more in new taxes than Republicans have so far been willing to consider.” In fact, Obama is now claiming he wants to double the tax increases on corporations and the wealthy from what he claimed during the campaign.

The idiots that elected do realize that this only going to cause prises to keep rising higher to make up for the additional taxes hey have to pay dont they. Like cheerleaders they’re good at rah rahing and producing offspring but not too keen in the common sense department.


14 posted on 11/14/2012 12:47:39 PM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

> “President Obama is taking a hard line with congressional Republicans heading into negotiations over the year-end ‘fiscal cliff,’ making no opening concessions and calling for far more in new taxes than Republicans have so far been willing to consider.” In fact, Obama is now claiming he wants to double the tax increases on corporations and the wealthy from what he claimed during the campaign.

The idiots that elected 0 do realize that this only going to cause prices to keep rising higher to make up for the additional taxes they have to pay dont they? Like cheerleaders they’re good at rah rahing and producing offspring but not too keen in the common sense department.


15 posted on 11/14/2012 12:48:30 PM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I have no idea what a toniest community is.

What I know is, the rich, the super rich, the uber super rich and all the et cetera's that go along with that, are just words to guide the thinking of joe six pack into thinking someone is actually being targetted.

If you consider the entire nation as a someone, then you understand the camel, its nose and the tent.

16 posted on 11/14/2012 12:50:46 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

And yet another thread on here claims that most of The Rich voted for him.

Irony, the Mark of Quality Literature.


17 posted on 11/14/2012 1:05:15 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
bammey rec'd the vote of 8 out of 10 of the richest areas in this country....

he has the hollowood crowd at his beck and call....

gates...buffoon....soros...and the rest....

there is NO increase in taxes to affect these people...

its a tax on high end middle income people with businesses...and it will ultimately come down to affect the average middle class worker...

no stinking oligarchy needs a thrifty middle class....its the ultra rich and the poor....

that's what is wanted...

you think these nasty hollowood types want to share the national parks with these campers, and trailers, and tents?...these peasants crowding out OUR shorelines with their little cabins?....these cretins going to our symphonies and enjoying OUR museums?....

the nerve...

18 posted on 11/14/2012 1:05:42 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Small business owners will be destroyed by Obamacare and by increased taxes on their income.

Don't buy the bullshit.

Throughout his campaign Obama claimed that small business people are only 3% of those making enough to be hit by his tax proposals. Romney never challenged him. But the truth is: it's a lie. That figure was ginned up by a left-wing think tank in Washington. How so? They counted everyone who had income reported on a 1099 form as being a "small business". Did you ever sell an item or two on EBay or Craig's List? Well, congratulations: Barack Obama thinks you're a "small business" now.

As for the Big Boys - they have availed themselves of outsourcing and offshoring opportunities only where they made economic sense in the context of an economy where fixed costs (labor, taxes, regulatory compliance) exceeded requirements for continued growth and profitability for the foreseeable future, and where new markets readily presented themselves.

Obamacare destroys that predictability - no one can safely predict profit margins or price points in a system where hoards of unelected bureaucrats make dozens of new regulations every day - as they are doing right now - in the service of laws that no one fully understands.

As a result (and coupled with the certainty of higher taxes): Fortune 500 companies will not simply outsource labor and offshore business units any more- they will move away to friendlier business locations. Such moves are already in the discussion phase with corporate consultants.

19 posted on 11/14/2012 1:06:08 PM PST by andy58-in-nh (Cogito, ergo armatum sum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The problem is you’re negotiating with someone who wants America to fall. So, do you allow it now and take the blame? Or do you kick the can again.

And by the way, can you imagine what he would have done had he lost?


20 posted on 11/14/2012 1:07:52 PM PST by Terry Mross (I haven't watched the news since the election. Someone ping me if anything big happens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson